Delhi High Court
60,340 judgments
Kuldeep Singh v. Kishan Kumar Since Deceased Through LRs and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 seeking modification of a settled judgment on government land, holding the issue conclusively decided by prior courts including the Supreme Court.
CPL Rohtash Singh Sahrawat v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for pension and retiral benefits within eight weeks, emphasizing procedural compliance before judicial relief.
Ananya Singh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University's admission policy denying participation in Spot Round counseling to candidates admitted in regular rounds without withdrawal, emphasizing judicial restraint in academic matters and adherence to merit-based procedures.
UV ASSEST RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an asset reconstruction company acquiring pledged shares under the SARFAESI Act is entitled to be recognized as the new pledgee by the depository, notwithstanding procedural gaps in the Depositories Act or SEBI regulations.
Sanjana v. Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction of a commercial shop occupant in a JJR colony, holding that conversion policies apply only to residential plots and original allottees, and eviction under the DUSIB Act was valid.
GENIE INFO SOLUTIONS LLP v. BECKTON DICKNISON INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitral Award, holding that the Court cannot re-appreciate evidence and the petitioner failed to prove its claim with cogent evidence.
M/S Madan Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that recovery orders under Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act require a pre-existing award or settlement and that the appropriate government cannot assume adjudicatory powers, quashing recovery orders issued without such foundation.
Jaya Saini v. Lt. Governor, GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a subsequent purchaser of a commercial shop in a JJR colony, ruling that conversion policies apply only to residential plots and non-application for mutation disentitles protection against eviction.
Binod Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking investigation into corruption allegations, holding that consent terms recorded by the Bombay High Court bar reopening settled disputes.
Akash Kukreja v. Lt Governor GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a subsequent purchaser of a commercial shop in a JJR colony, holding that conversion policies apply only to original allottees or heirs and that exclusion of commercial plots from conversion is not arbitrary.
M/S SUNEJA CARD EMPORIUM PVT LTD v. SHRI CHANDER MOHAN SETHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's low rent fixation during tenancy dispute pendency and directed reconsideration based on market rent and relevant legal principles.
Spectrum Power Generation Limited v. GAIL (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual dispute over GST reimbursement is arbitrable and appointed a sole arbitrator, rejecting the respondent's non-arbitrability objection based on taxation.
Mahender Pal v. Lt Governor GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction of a subsequent purchaser of a commercial JJR plot, holding that conversion policies apply only to original allottees and occupation without mutation or conversion is unauthorized.
Akash Mohan Gupta v. Neera Burra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit discloses a cause of action and is not barred by limitation or vexatious on the face of the plaint.
THE CHOPRAS ITECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. MUKESH BERI
The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 following mutual termination of the original arbitrator's mandate.
Mrs. X v. GNCTD & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks gestation on grounds of substantial foetal abnormalities and mental trauma to the mother, emphasizing the woman's reproductive rights under Article 21 and the discretion of courts despite Medical Board denial.
Nawal Kishore Mehta v. The I.C.A.R. and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s confirmation of compulsory retirement following a fair domestic enquiry, emphasizing limited writ jurisdiction and the wider appellate powers of Labour Courts under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Col Sunil Kumar (Retd) v. Secretary Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation and President, Governing Council CGEWHO and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a retired Army officer appointed as CEO of CGEWHO through open competition is entitled to service gratuity and leave encashment under CGEWHO’s Conditions of Service, as the 1986 Order on re-employed pensioners does not apply.
M/S B.T.M EXPORTS LTD. v. M/S PS EXIM (HK) LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral contract amendments without consent are invalid and awarded damages with interest to the plaintiff for breach of contract in an iron ore sale dispute.
Kush Raj Bhatia v. M/S DLF Power & Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition holding it lacks jurisdiction to review its order under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act and affirmed that the exclusive jurisdiction clause confers jurisdiction on Gurgaon and Chandigarh courts, not Delhi.