Delhi High Court
29,474 judgments
Mukesh Singh v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an independent medical examination to determine the petitioner's fitness for CAPF recruitment, making the hospital's report final and binding on the parties.
Crest Digitel Private Limited v. Telecommunications Consultants India Limited
The Delhi High Court stayed a five-year blacklisting order against Crest Digitel by TCIL for non-payment of revenue shares, directing resolution through meetings and interim payments while highlighting governance lapses and collusion.
Gauri @ Supriya v. Davesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of the petitioner's application to dismiss the divorce plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that mixed questions of fact and law and subsequent events justified proceeding with the suit.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -12 v. Bindu Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that an assessment based solely on an investigation report without independent enquiry is unsustainable and upheld the Tribunal's factual findings on the genuineness of share transactions.
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Renu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded for death of an employee murdered during the course of employment, limiting appeal scope under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act to substantial questions of law and condoning delay due to COVID-19.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions by recording a mutually agreed settlement between Oriental Insurance Company and complainant regarding employment and financial benefits, modifying the Chief Commissioner's earlier order.
Manoj Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. ART Affordable Housing Finance India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against rejection of a Section 34 petition, holding that an arbitral award passed ex parte after due opportunity and non-participation by the appellants cannot be set aside.
Snigdha v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2015 recruitment on grounds of inordinate delay and laches, holding that stale claims affecting third-party rights cannot be entertained and allegations of tampering cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.
Modern Snacks Pvt Ltd v. The Registrar of Trade Mark
The Delhi High Court remanded a trademark review application for reconsideration after holding that non-communication of the impugned order precluded limitation and violated the appellant's right to be heard.
Nutan Thakur v. Shiv Nath Thakur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under the Domestic Violence Act, a complainant must prove domestic violence by leading evidence and cannot rely solely on cross-examination of the respondent, dismissing the petition but allowing one final opportunity to lead evidence.
Managing Committee The Delhi University Co-Operative Store Ltd v. Asian Enterprises
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's forfeiture of the defendants' right to file a written statement and directed the extension application to be decided on merits, emphasizing adjudication on substantive rights over procedural defaults.
Hadiklaim Central Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd v. MS Dharamraj and Sons and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by enforcing settlement agreements wherein defendants acknowledged the plaintiff's exclusive trademark rights and undertook not to infringe or challenge them.
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Equipment Conductors & Cables Ltd.
The court allowed reframing of issues to exclude foreclosure claims against defendant No.4, affirming that a guarantor's liability continues post-settlement with the principal debtor under an express agreement clause.
M/S SPACE 4 BUSINESS SOLUTION PVT LTD v. DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SUPPLY & CONSUMER AFFAIRS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a government tender agreement due to the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator.
Mamta Goel @ Mamta Rani Goel v. Dhanraj Mittal (Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's discovery application for lack of reasoned order and directed reconsideration with opportunity of hearing.
Sudesh Kaushik v. CBI
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case due to irregularities in sanction, unreliable electronic evidence, non-examination of crucial witnesses, and failure to prove demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
LIFELONG ONLINE RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS ANITA GUPTA
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using a mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark following the defendant's undertaking not to use the mark and to withdraw the trademark application.
Karishma Oberoi v. Ajay Kumar & Abhishek Oberoi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for cancellation of Sale Deed due to failure to plead fraud with requisite particulars, holding that vague allegations do not constitute cause of action under Order VI and VII CPC.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. KAILASH DEVI TRADING AS M/S MAHABIR TEXTILES
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit between Tata Sons and Kailash Devi by approving a settlement agreement that acknowledged infringement and set binding terms for cessation of use and compensation.
M/S BHAGWATI AIR EXPRESS PVT. LTD. v. BALAKRISHNAN SHIVRAM IYER & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash pre-summoning proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should be sparingly exercised and factual controversies must be decided at trial.