Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
M/S Devansh Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that after expiry of a fixed-term lease, the tenant becomes an unauthorized occupant liable to pay mesne profits at prevailing market rent to the purchaser assigned the right to recover arrears.
Amit Mehendru v. Ajay Mahendru & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed preservation of business account records for mesne profit claims based on a Will bequeathing property, clarifying that production of such documents before trial is subject to the trial court's discretion.
Himalaya Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Fozal Power Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from supplementary agreements despite objections on prematurity and pre-arbitration conditions.
Lt. Col. S.P. Singh (Retd.) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court declined to order an independent medical investigation into a patient's death where detailed Army Courts of Inquiry had been conducted, but directed disclosure of all medical and inquiry records to the petitioner.
Ramesh Kukreja v. Lt. Governor GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction orders for unauthorized occupation of a commercial shop in a JJR colony, holding that conversion policies apply only to original allottees or heirs and that the petitioner’s failure to comply with mutation and conversion requirements disentitles him from relief.
ISEC Organics Limited v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Delhi High Court directed transplantation of a Peepal tree under scientific supervision, allowing removal despite a general tree felling ban, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
M/S. RADNIK EXPORTS & ORS. v. M/S. STL GLOBAL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of applications for rejection of plaints on limitation grounds, holding that limitation being a mixed question of law and fact requires trial and that Section 14 of the Limitation Act excludes time spent prosecuting suits in courts without jurisdiction in good faith.
Amit Kumar v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, holding that the trial court's discretion and the petitioner's delay did not warrant interference under Section 482 CrPC.
Parvesh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, safeguarding the minor child's rights.
Mitthan Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging assault, holding that the disputed compromise was not voluntary and the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised cautiously.
Hans Raj v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an electricity bill raised for unauthorized load usage and meter tampering, holding that the appellant failed to disprove the respondent's cogent inspection report and evidence.
Sunny Jain v. The Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that blocking Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A CGST Rules solely for non-payment to supplier within 180 days is unlawful and directed immediate unblocking of the ITC.
Sheena Jain v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following reconciliation between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process and maintain matrimonial harmony.
Ravinder Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving copyright and trademark offences based on a voluntary settlement between parties, subject to payment to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.
Rajeev Sharma v. Pallavi Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's assessment of husband's income and maintenance order, dismissing appeals and directing payment of arrears with liberty for future enhancement upon new evidence.
Power Infrastructure India v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing appeals before the NCLAT is computed from the date of physical filing as per NCLAT Rules, leaving the question of limitation to be decided by the NCLAT itself.
Steward Gulshan Kumar & Ors. v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation for creation of promotional posts and promotions in accordance with the Supreme Court's binding judgment in State of Tripura & Ors. v. Sri K.K. Roy.
Prabhjot Singh v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the SDM to decide the petitioner's application for extension of moneylending license area to New Delhi within three months, emphasizing timely and reasoned administrative action under the Punjab Registration of Money Lenders Act, 1938.
HYATT INDIA CONSULTANCY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that requiring an active IEC at the time of rendering services to claim SEIS benefits is ultra vires the FTDR Act and directed fresh consideration of claims in light of a government amendment clarifying IEC necessity only at benefit claim stage.
M/S. KIZHAKKETHALAKKAL ROCKS v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Expert Appraisal Committee may transfer mining lease proposals to the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority after its constitution under exceptional circumstances, allowing the SEIAA to proceed with appraisal despite pending litigation.