Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
DFM FOODS LTD v. ISHVI FOOD PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit acknowledging infringement and passing off, disposing of the suit on agreed terms binding the parties.
Benita Sharma v. Anil Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a General Manager for lack of prima facie case and abuse of process, emphasizing the need for judicial mind and specific allegations to implicate under Section 34 IPC.
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Harpal Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award due to violation of natural justice by denying cross-examination, while clarifying that courts cannot modify arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Bhim Sen v. Mukul Kumar & Anr.
The High Court held that a third party, such as a father, has no locus standi to seek a declaration on the marital status of his daughter's husband under Section 7(1)(b) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, dismissing the petition as not maintainable.
M/S H.QR.P. LIMITED & Ors. v. M/S M.T.I LIMITED & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to stay a suit under Section 10 CPC, holding that the issues and parties in the suit were not directly and substantially in issue in previously instituted suits.
Vinod Kumar v. Intellectual Property Appellate Board
The Delhi High Court quashed the IPAB order rejecting adjournment based on social media evidence without hearing, restoring the rectification petitions for re-hearing and emphasizing natural justice principles.
Food Corporation of India v. Govt. of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Assistant Managers of Food Corporation of India are not 'workmen' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's direction to grant them selection grade from 1971.
Partha Ghosh v. Registrar of Companies & Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint against a statutory auditor under the Companies Act as barred by the six-month limitation period, reaffirming the binding precedent that limitation commences from the date of actionable knowledge of the offence.
Babu & Co & Ors. v. Deepanshu Goel
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order closing defence evidence in a cheque dishonour case and granted the accused a final opportunity to lead defence evidence under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the importance of a fair trial.
Rekha Rani v. Ajay Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to permit reliance on statements in the reply under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC during final arguments and ordered expeditious disposal of the long-pending civil petition.
United Drilling Tools Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying pre-reference interest where the contract expressly waived such claims, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LIMITED
Delhi High Court dismisses ONGC's petition challenging arbitral award refunding liquidated damages to UDT, affirming limited scope of court interference under Section 34 of Arbitration Act.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. Intas Pharmaceutical Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a pharmaceutical trademark dispute, holding that non-use of a registered mark and lack of deceptive similarity preclude interim relief.
Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 308/323/34 IPC based on amicable settlement and minor injury, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Manish Lenka v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed government school authorities to provide free uniform, waive computer fees, and consider transportation cost reimbursement to a visually impaired student under the RPWD Act, 2016, affirming statutory obligations for inclusive education.
Novartis AG & Anr. v. Zydus Healthcare Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Novartis' quia timet patent infringement suit disclosed a valid cause of action and refused to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, allowing the suit to proceed to trial.
Prashant v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition challenging age-related discrepancies in a sportsperson's documents, emphasizing the necessity of an Age Verification Test under the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011.
Kapil Chopra v. Malini Israni & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal for interim possession of a disputed luxury car, holding that a strong prima facie case and risk of irreparable injury justified relief despite respondent's claim of gift.
Raghav Gupta v. Chandra Prakash Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s procedural order directing the plaintiff to clarify instructions regarding continuation of a partition suit post-relinquishment deed, affirming the Trial Court’s power to examine parties under CPC without infringing client-counsel confidentiality.
Havaldar Narender Kumar v. CPIO RTI CELL ADG MT IHQ OF MOD & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the RTI petition after finding that the requested test records were destroyed following a Court of Inquiry and the respondents complied with CIC directions by providing available information and affidavits confirming non-availability.