Delhi High Court

60,544 judgments

Year:

United Drilling Tools Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

12 Dec 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:5770

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying pre-reference interest where the contract expressly waived such claims, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 pre-reference interest pendente-lite interest

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LIMITED

12 Dec 2022 · CHANDRA DHARI SINGH · 2022:DHC:5769

Delhi High Court dismisses ONGC's petition challenging arbitral award refunding liquidated damages to UDT, affirming limited scope of court interference under Section 34 of Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration petition_dismissed Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Liquidated Damages Pre-suit Interest

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. Intas Pharmaceutical Ltd & Anr.

12 Dec 2022 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5539-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a pharmaceutical trademark dispute, holding that non-use of a registered mark and lack of deceptive similarity preclude interim relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction trademark infringement pharmaceutical trademarks deceptive similarity

Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

12 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:311

Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 308/323/34 IPC based on amicable settlement and minor injury, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 308 IPC

Manish Lenka v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5521
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court directed government school authorities to provide free uniform, waive computer fees, and consider transportation cost reimbursement to a visually impaired student under the RPWD Act, 2016, affirming statutory obligations for inclusive education.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 inclusive education assistive devices fee waiver

Novartis AG & Anr. v. Zydus Healthcare Limited & Anr.

12 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5462
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Novartis' quia timet patent infringement suit disclosed a valid cause of action and refused to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, allowing the suit to proceed to trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action quia timet suit patent infringement

Prashant v. Union of India and Ors.

12 Dec 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ; Subramonium Prasad, J · 2023:DHC:403-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition challenging age-related discrepancies in a sportsperson's documents, emphasizing the necessity of an Age Verification Test under the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Age Verification Test National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 Date of birth discrepancy Writ jurisdiction

Kapil Chopra v. Malini Israni & Ors.

12 Dec 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5688

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal for interim possession of a disputed luxury car, holding that a strong prima facie case and risk of irreparable injury justified relief despite respondent's claim of gift.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim relief Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Transfer of Property Act gift

Raghav Gupta v. Chandra Prakash Gupta

12 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5533

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s procedural order directing the plaintiff to clarify instructions regarding continuation of a partition suit post-relinquishment deed, affirming the Trial Court’s power to examine parties under CPC without infringing client-counsel confidentiality.

civil petition_dismissed Order 3 Rule 4 CPC Order 10 CPC relinquishment deed client-counsel communication

Havaldar Narender Kumar v. CPIO RTI CELL ADG MT IHQ OF MOD & ANR

12 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5520

The Delhi High Court dismissed the RTI petition after finding that the requested test records were destroyed following a Court of Inquiry and the respondents complied with CIC directions by providing available information and affidavits confirming non-availability.

administrative petition_dismissed Right to Information Act, 2005 RTI application Court of Inquiry destruction of records

Banwari Lal Meena v. Secretary, Lok Sabha Secretariat

12 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5620

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment on the ground of unexplained delay and laches, emphasizing the finality of recruitment processes and limited validity of selection panels.

administrative petition_dismissed delay and laches writ petition appointment scheduled tribe reservation

Bajrang v. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment & Anr.

12 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5522

The Delhi High Court held that a hyper-technical rejection of a scholarship application due to submission of an Income Tax Return instead of an Income Certificate is impermissible when both documents establish eligibility, directing the Ministry to grant the scholarship to the meritorious petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Sector Scholarship Scheme Income Certificate Income Tax Return Scheduled Caste students

Satnam Singh Pabla v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.

12 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5481

The Delhi High Court directed the employer to determine and release the pension and gratuity dues payable to a retired employee removed from service after disciplinary proceedings, mandating a reasoned order within six weeks.

labor petition_allowed pension gratuity retiral benefits removal from service

Sonya Kapur v. Controller General of Patent, Designs and Trademark

12 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5502

The Delhi High Court set aside the grant of a patent for failure to consider a pre-grant opposition and remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing that procedural technicalities should not defeat substantive statutory rights.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant pre-grant opposition patent grant Section 25 Patents Act 1970 Article 226 Constitution of India

Vikram Verma v. State and Others

12 Dec 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · CRL.M.C. 4720/2017

The Delhi High Court held that failure to establish exclusive possession in civil proceedings negates the essential ingredient of criminal trespass, dismissing the petition challenging discharge of accused in a trespass case.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant criminal trespass Section 448 IPC civil suit dismissal possession

Sanjay Shandilya & Akash Raj Gupta v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Kawaljeet Singh Duggal

12 Dec 2022 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:5538

The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's jurisdiction to summon company directors under Section 138 N.I. Act based on a complaint filed by a Special Power of Attorney holder authorized against the company, dismissing the petition challenging the summoning order.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 322 Cr.P.C. Special Power of Attorney

Shahid Hussain v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5648

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a Railway Property Act case, emphasizing cautious exercise of discretion under Section 438 CrPC with conditions ensuring cooperation and safeguarding investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 bail conditions

Dhruv Krishan Maggu v. Principal Director General, DGGI (HQRS.), RK Puram, New Delhi & Anr

12 Dec 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5527

The Delhi High Court held that seized documents and electronic devices related to GST fraud investigations can be lawfully retained beyond six months under the CGST Act, 2017, dismissing the petition seeking their immediate return.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 67 Section 74 seizure of documents

Union of India v. RCCIVL -LITL (JV)

12 Dec 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:5476

The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitrator's order directing partial release of Performance Bank Guarantees to the contractor, holding that the appellant cannot withhold security after acknowledging contract completion and that interim relief must balance equities without pre-judging merits.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Performance Bank Guarantee Interim relief Section 17 Arbitration Act Contractual interpretation

CAPSTECH NETWORK PVT LTD & ORS. v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

12 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:155

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute under Sections 420, 406, 120-B, and 34 IPC based on a bona fide settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR commercial dispute settlement agreement