Delhi High Court
60,367 judgments
Sahil Kumar @ Kashi v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a neighborly dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Harpreet Singh Sethi v. State
The Delhi High Court directed that in a matrimonial dispute case under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, arrest of the petitioner can only be effected after giving a 10-day notice if the petitioner cooperates with the investigation.
Vodafone Mauritius Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle International-Tax 3(1)(1), Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court remitted reassessment proceedings against Vodafone Mauritius to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of jurisdiction and DTAA benefits after hearing the petitioner.
World Phone Internet Services Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking regulation of OTT internet telephony services, directing TRAI to conduct stakeholder consultations and reconsider the regulatory framework before any enforcement action.
Empire Trading Company v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax notices and order issued against a dissolved partnership firm for failure to furnish material to the ex-partners and directed the assessing officer to provide material and an opportunity of hearing before proceeding.
Ganga Ram Sharma v. Mukesh Kumar
The High Court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek recall of Non-Bailable Warrant and process under Section 82 CrPC in view of a settlement, keeping coercive process in abeyance pending trial court's decision.
Anil Malhotra v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court held that withholding pension under Regulation 33 without notice and hearing violates natural justice and quashed the impugned order, directing a fresh decision after affording opportunity to the petitioner.
Sanjeev Kumar & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under matrimonial dispute offences based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.
Jyoti Trivedi & Anr. v. Central Information Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the penalty imposed on an officiating CPIO for delay in furnishing RTI information due to claimed technical malfunction but upheld the CIC’s directions for disclosure.
Rohini Chopra v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a District Magistrate's order must be reasoned and directed issuance of a detailed order before eviction, while staying eviction pending appeal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.
Mukesh Singh v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an independent medical examination to determine the petitioner's fitness for CAPF recruitment, making the hospital's report final and binding on the parties.
Crest Digitel Private Limited v. Telecommunications Consultants India Limited
The Delhi High Court stayed a five-year blacklisting order against Crest Digitel by TCIL for non-payment of revenue shares, directing resolution through meetings and interim payments while highlighting governance lapses and collusion.
Gauri @ Supriya v. Davesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of the petitioner's application to dismiss the divorce plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that mixed questions of fact and law and subsequent events justified proceeding with the suit.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -12 v. Bindu Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that an assessment based solely on an investigation report without independent enquiry is unsustainable and upheld the Tribunal's factual findings on the genuineness of share transactions.
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Renu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded for death of an employee murdered during the course of employment, limiting appeal scope under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act to substantial questions of law and condoning delay due to COVID-19.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions by recording a mutually agreed settlement between Oriental Insurance Company and complainant regarding employment and financial benefits, modifying the Chief Commissioner's earlier order.
Manoj Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. ART Affordable Housing Finance India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against rejection of a Section 34 petition, holding that an arbitral award passed ex parte after due opportunity and non-participation by the appellants cannot be set aside.
Snigdha v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2015 recruitment on grounds of inordinate delay and laches, holding that stale claims affecting third-party rights cannot be entertained and allegations of tampering cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.
Modern Snacks Pvt Ltd v. The Registrar of Trade Mark
The Delhi High Court remanded a trademark review application for reconsideration after holding that non-communication of the impugned order precluded limitation and violated the appellant's right to be heard.
Nutan Thakur v. Shiv Nath Thakur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under the Domestic Violence Act, a complainant must prove domestic violence by leading evidence and cannot rely solely on cross-examination of the respondent, dismissing the petition but allowing one final opportunity to lead evidence.