Delhi High Court
60,544 judgments
Deepak @ Hariom & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine settlement and mutual divorce.
Montblanc-Simplo GmbH v. M/S Jai Lakshman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Montblanc, holding retail sellers liable for trademark infringement and passing off for selling counterfeit goods bearing plaintiff's registered trademarks.
Ujjwal Gupta & Anr. v. State (GNCTD) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 498A, 304B, 302, and 34 IPC against the petitioners, ruling that a prima facie case existed and no interference was warranted at the charge framing stage.
Yves Saint Laurent v. Brompton Lifestyle Brands Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Brompton, lacking authorization under the terminated franchise agreement, infringed YSL's trademarks and refused to refer the dispute to arbitration, granting interim injunction in favor of YSL.
Surya Day Private Limited v. NTPC Limited
The Delhi High Court held that NTPC's three-year banning order against Surya Day Private Limited was disproportionate and based on suspicion without adequate inquiry, restricting the ban to the period already elapsed and emphasizing the need for speaking orders and proportionality in banning decisions.
Pratima Kumari v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation challenging her deinduction from the Central Weightlifting Team within a stipulated time, without setting aside the impugned orders.
M/S. HIMLAND HOUSING PVT. LTD. v. M/S. OMBIR PANWAR & CO.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC merely on the ground of alleged non-registration of a partnership firm under Section 69 of the Partnership Act, as this is a triable issue requiring evidence.
Surender Kumar v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending promotion representations within six weeks following his acquittal, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles on promotion after criminal acquittal.
Anjali College of Pharmacy and Science v. Pharmacy Council of India
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the writ petition directing the Pharmacy Council of India to grant approval for the petitioner’s D.Pharm course but upheld rejection of B.Pharm and M.Pharm approvals due to the Principal’s ineligibility under statutory regulations.
Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology v. Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that merit-based restrictions on participation in special offline counseling for admissions do not violate the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) to run an educational institution.
Rashmi Bhatt v. Secretary Cum Labour Commissioner, Govt NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to release terminal benefits and process compassionate appointment for the widow of a missing government employee upon submission of required documents.
Uma Gupta v. Sub-Registrar VI-A and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed registration of notarized duplicate documents bearing original signatures when original documents submitted for registration were lost by the Sub-Registrar, protecting the petitioner’s procedural rights without deciding ownership.
Kailash Chand v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT order, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to salary arrears or seniority beyond the relief granted by the Court’s 2001 judgment and must be treated similarly to other Production Assistants reappointed after termination for irregular appointment.
Dr. Tarun Kothari v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed interim de-sealing of a diagnostic clinic pending appeal against renewal refusal under the PCPNDT Act, balancing regulatory compliance with patient safety and livelihood rights.
Brindco Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that automatic extensions of liquor import permits do not count as revalidations, and quashed the arbitrary rejection of the petitioner’s lawful revalidation request under the Delhi Excise Act and Rules.
Mangalam Traders v. Value Added Tax Officer and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a selling dealer is entitled to the benefit of C Forms if the purchasing dealer is duly registered and the C Forms are genuine, and cannot be penalized for unverifiable or mismatched C Forms issued by the purchaser.
Tejpal Singh v. Surinder Kumar Dewan
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitration awards granting damages for breach of collaboration agreement due to unauthorized construction and consequent mental agony, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
M/S Maniratnam Enterprises v. M/S Rajputana Fertilizers
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim protection of scrap and status quo ante, holding that the termination notice complied with contractual terms and the petitioner delayed in seeking relief, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Raghukul Bhushan v. Chanderlekha Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit for specific performance of an agreement relating to immovable property situated outside Delhi, notwithstanding a jurisdiction clause or defendant's residence.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sunita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that voluntary ex-gratia payments made by an employer prior to a claim are not deductible from statutory compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.