Delhi High Court

94,906 judgments

Year:

Janodaya Ekta Samiti & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

15 Dec 2022 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5624

The Delhi High Court held that the Government may reconstitute Town Vending Committees without following removal procedures, and petitioners have no vested right to continue as members.

administrative petition_dismissed Town Vending Committees Street Vendors Act 2014 Reconstitution of Committees Removal of Members

Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India

15 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5636-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging termination of a probationary SSB constable for failure to complete basic training within two chances, holding the termination lawful and procedurally valid.

administrative petition_dismissed termination during probation Basic Recruit Training Course unsuitability Sashastra Seema Bal Rules 2009

C. Maheshwaran v. Union of India

15 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9875-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's refusal to stay disciplinary proceedings, holding that interlocutory orders should not be interfered with absent irreparable prejudice and that contentious delegation issues must be decided by the Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed disciplinary proceedings charge sheet Central Administrative Tribunal interlocutory order

Mohit Bajaj v. Manju Bajaj & Anr.

14 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:159

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging a Family Court maintenance order, holding that revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reappraise evidence absent manifest illegality or perversity.

family appeal_dismissed revisional jurisdiction maintenance order Family Court Sections 397, 401, 482 Cr.P.C.

Rajat Bhaskar v. The State & Anr.

14 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:98

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent injustice and secure the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 354 IPC molestation

Ajay Sharma & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

14 Dec 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2670

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a municipal NOC for lift installation in DDA flats, dismissing a writ petition challenging it and clarifying that unauthorized construction issues must be addressed separately under the DMC Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant No Objection Certificate lift installation Delhi Development Authority Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Deepak Sangwan & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

14 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:97

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, and 34 IPC on the basis of a voluntary compromise between relatives, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent injustice and promote social harmony.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence compromise

Brijesh Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.

14 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:96

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-serious criminal FIR under Sections 323, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR inherent powers amicable settlement

Inderjeet Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

14 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5722

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to grant pay protection and count past service after ex-post facto approval of the petitioner's resignation, ordering release of benefits within four weeks.

administrative other pay protection technical resignation ex-post facto approval counting of past service

Aditya Narayan Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India through Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India & Ors.

14 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5644

The Delhi High Court directed the UGC to consider and decide the petitioners' representation for implementing a government order on Pharmacists' nomenclature change, ensuring no discrimination among similarly placed employees.

administrative other writ of mandamus nomenclature change Pharmacists Central Government Health Scheme

Earthz Urban Spaces Pvt Ltd v. Shiv Raj Kochhar & Anr.

14 Dec 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5561

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputed factual issues and jurisdictional challenges cannot bar arbitration under a valid Arbitration Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act Appointment of Arbitrator Rescission of Contract

Mr.Dinesh Garg, Advocate v. STATE .....

14 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5567

The Delhi High Court held that accused cannot be forcibly taken for forensic voice and photograph samples but refusal to comply may attract adverse inference under the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant forensic science laboratory voice sample face recognition adverse inference

The Hind Samachar Limited v. Punjab Kesari Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

14 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5589

The Delhi High Court allowed rectification of a trademark registration to restrict territorial use between family members pursuant to a family settlement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Trade Marks Act 1999 rectification of trademark family settlement territorial rights

Anil Kumar Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)

14 Dec 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5543

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case involving real estate fraud, holding that the seriousness of offences outweighs medical grounds for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail application Section 439 CrPC economic offences cheating

Art Screw Co., Ltd. v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

14 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5571

The Delhi High Court set aside an incomprehensible patent rejection order for lack of inventive step and remanded the matter for fresh, reasoned consideration with opportunity of hearing.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Procedural inventive step patent application prior art Section 2(1)(ja) Patents Act

Ram Kishore Arora & Ors. v. Union Bank of India & Anr

14 Dec 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:5570

The Delhi High Court quashed cryptic wilful defaulter orders for violating natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh reasoned consideration of the petitioners' submissions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant wilful defaulter natural justice reasoned order bank loan default

Meenu Sachdev v. Managing Committee Sri Sathya Sai Vidya Vihar and Another

14 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:18

The Delhi High Court held that private recognized unaided schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act to pay revised salaries and arrears as per the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions, rejecting delay and financial hardship defenses.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 10(1) Delhi School Education Act 6th Pay Commission 7th Pay Commission unaided private schools

Nazir Khan v. The State of NCT of Delhi

14 Dec 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:5611
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Sentence Review Board's reasoned rejection of premature release of a life convict involved in terrorist offences, emphasizing limited judicial review and the necessity of reasoned administrative decisions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant premature release life imprisonment Sentence Review Board judicial review

M/S HERANBA INDUSTRIES LTD v. M/S HINDUSTAN INSECTICIDES LTD

14 Dec 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:5542-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed Heranba's appeal challenging an arbitral award that held the RITES contract was not covered under the parties' Agreement and rejected Heranba's claims for breach of contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 contract interpretation

Singtel Global India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Dec 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:5541-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is a principal service provider entitled to refund of unutilized input tax credit on exported telecommunication services and set aside the order denying the refund.

tax petition_allowed Significant input tax credit refund export of services intermediary vs principal service provider Service Tax Rules 1994