Delhi High Court

94,906 judgments

Year:

M/S Rathi Steel and Power Limited v. Industrial Energy

19 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5882

The Delhi High Court directed reference of a contractual dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing an arbitrator through DIAC and leaving substantive issues to arbitration.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(2) arbitration clause

Desh Deepak Verma v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

16 Dec 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:207

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D, 509, and 506 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and absence of likelihood of conviction, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent powers of High Court settlement between parties

Narender Kumar v. Prakash & Ors.

16 Dec 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5692
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an ex parte decree duly served upon the defendant cannot be challenged by a separate suit and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for being barred by law and lacking specific allegations of fraud.

civil petition_dismissed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Section 96 CPC fraud in decree

Indian Airlines Officers Association v. Union of India & Anr.

16 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5765

The Delhi High Court held that post-privatization, Air India Limited ceased to be a public authority amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, dismissing the writ petition while allowing petitioners to seek remedy before appropriate forums.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 Article 12 privatization

M/s D.T.C. v. Dharam Pal Singh

16 Dec 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:5597

The Delhi High Court upheld the Controlling Authority's order directing payment of differential gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting the petitioner's claim that its internal office order governed gratuity payment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 gratuity entitlement jurisdiction of Controlling Authority office order gratuity scheme

Shri Pawan Jhalani v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

16 Dec 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5690-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an income tax order and directed the petitioner to file a revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, which must be considered on merits without limitation objections.

tax appeal_dismissed Procedural Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 179 Section 264 revision petition

Rajinder Kumar v. State & Anr.

16 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2022:DHC:5608

The Delhi High Court held that prosecution under the Income Tax Act cannot be barred on the ground of the assessee’s age unless the assessee was above 70 years at the time of commission of offence, and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of prosecution for concealment of foreign income.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 undisclosed foreign income prosecution age exemption Instruction No. 5051

Prakash Chand Meena v. Nitin Khurana

16 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5717

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a 2010 arbitration award due to delay, laches, and a subsequent settlement agreement, holding that procedural irregularities did not warrant interference after the petitioner’s acquiescence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration award procedural irregularity service of award delay and laches

Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited v. Sujata Hotel Private Limited

16 Dec 2022 · Yashwant Varma

The Delhi High Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal cannot grant final reliefs under Section 17 interim measures and set aside its order extending a concession period as beyond its jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim measures Interim injunction Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krishna Batra & Ors.

16 Dec 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:5596

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer must pay compensation to accident victims even if the driver lacked a valid license, but the insurer retains the right to recover the amount from the insured.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Insurance liability Driving license Breach of policy conditions

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. DR. P.K. RATHORE

16 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5757
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Caste lacks jurisdiction to issue binding directions in service matters, quashing its orders directing transfer and promotion of a government employee.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Scheduled Caste Article 338 Constitution of India service matters jurisdiction transfer orders

KAMLADLTYYA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD & ANR. v. RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

16 Dec 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5598

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a railway redevelopment contract, holding that writ jurisdiction is limited in contractual disputes involving disputed facts and arbitration clauses, and the termination was not palpably arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 contract termination arbitrariness

G.C. Srivastava v. Union of India and Ors

16 Dec 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:5616

The Delhi High Court held that service as IAS officer and subsequent service as Vice-Chairman of CAT, separated by a gap, cannot be clubbed for gratuity calculation under the High Court Judges Act, 1954.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant gratuity pension Central Administrative Tribunal IAS service

Nishant Muttreja & Sushant Muttreja v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2022 · Yogesh Khanna · 2022:DHC:5599

Delhi High Court granted bail to directors accused of economic offences after prolonged custody, emphasizing that magnitude of offence alone cannot deny bail when investigation is complete and no risk of tampering or flight exists.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences Section 409 IPC criminal breach of trust

Praveen Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Dec 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court held that denial of House Rent Allowance to Group-A officers of BSF and CRPF, while granting it to PBORs, is discriminatory and directed extension of HRA benefits to all personnel irrespective of rank.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant House Rent Allowance Personnel Below Officer Rank Group-A Officers Seventh Pay Commission

Sh. Govind Ram v. Sh. Sunny Chaudhary & Ors.

16 Dec 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5756

The Delhi High Court allowed revision to implead the Municipal Corporation of Delhi as a party in a suit concerning encroachment and unauthorized construction against a layout plan it approved.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment necessary party proper party

Rameshwar Jha v. The Principal Richmond Global School & Ors.

16 Dec 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh

Delhi High Court clarifies that the 25% EWS admission quota under the RTE Act is a minimum based on declared class strength, mandates compliance by private unaided schools, and affirms DoE's authority to enforce admissions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Right to Education Economically Weaker Section RTE Act 2009 Section 12(1)(c)

Ayush Gupta & Anr. v. Sunil Chanana & Anr.

15 Dec 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:5725-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of tenant-landlord appeals by enforcing a lawful settlement embodied in an MOU, setting aside the possession decree upon payment of a settlement amount.

civil appeal_allowed Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree of possession Memorandum of Understanding

Ayush Gupta & Anr. v. Sunil Chanana & Anr.

15 Dec 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:5698-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals by recording a lawful settlement between landlord and tenant parties, setting aside the possession decree subject to payment terms in the Memorandum of Understanding.

civil appeal_allowed Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree of possession Memorandum of Understanding

TDI Infrastructure Ltd. v. Col. Karan Bhagat

15 Dec 2022 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5654

The Delhi High Court set aside a consumer commission's order directing deposit of the awarded amount without hearing the petitioner, emphasizing the requirement of procedural fairness akin to Order 41 Rule 5 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant deposit of decretal amount execution proceedings opportunity of hearing Order 41 Rule 5 CPC