Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
National Highway Authority of India v. M/S SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award on grounds of public policy and patent illegality, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Pawan & Anr v. State (CBI)
The Delhi High Court granted regular suspension of sentence to appellant Pawan pending appeal, relying on parity with co-accused and the fact that he had served over 50% of his sentence.
Radha Charan Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's representation for Compassionate Allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, setting aside the impugned order that merely reiterated dismissal justification.
Sadruddin & Anr. v. Qutabidin & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expedite hearing and disposal of an interim injunction application and maintain status quo to prevent prejudice from ongoing illegal construction.
ALTF SPACES PRIVATE LIMITED v. HOMESTORE18
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a valid arbitration clause incorporated in electronically agreed Terms of Use, affirming the enforceability of such clauses and the court's jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators.
Ranjit Singh Sethi v. Ranbir Singh Sethi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the impleadment of the deceased's second wife as a necessary party in a partition suit due to her claimed interest under a Will.
Accurate Freight Logistics and Ors. v. Avon Logistics and Shipping
The Delhi High Court upheld the strict 120-day time limit under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, refusing to condone delay in filing a written statement despite non-supply of plaint with summons served via WhatsApp.
Akhilesh Arya v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act but reduced his life sentence to the period already served, emphasizing the credibility of child testimony and medical evidence despite minor inconsistencies.
M/S Neelkanth Travels v. Mohan Lal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a stationary vehicle parked for its intended use is considered 'in use' under the Employees’ Compensation Act, making the insurer liable to pay compensation, while the employer alone is liable for penalty on default.
Sachin Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation for increment and financial benefits within four weeks and communicate a reasoned decision.
Sarthak Sachdeva v. Karishma Chadha
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of a divorce petition to a joint petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act following amicable settlement, directing the Family Court to waive the six-month waiting period and proceed with mutual consent divorce.
Tapan Choudhury v. The Central Public Information Officer and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CIC order, holding that the information under the RTI Act was adequately provided and disputes over similar company names are to be resolved through civil litigation.
Mohan Prasad (Since Deceased) through his LRs Yogesh & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed administrative and infrastructural reforms to address delays in consumer dispute redressal forums while deferring appointments pending Supreme Court orders.
Devi Lal Chahar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Movement Order directing psychiatric evaluation of a service member is a legitimate administrative measure, not a punitive transfer, and vacated the interim stay against it.
Rajeev Chhabra v. Surender Khurana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed release of original sale deeds to the petitioner in accordance with a valid Memorandum of Settlement resolving the property dispute.
Ex Recruit Shubham Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that discharge orders under Army Rule 13(3)(IV) are subject to the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal and directed transfer of writ petitions challenging such discharges accordingly.
Niket Ranjan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a POCSO case due to inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and prolonged custody, subject to stringent conditions including relocation.
Pankaj Kumar Bhola v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's sentence under the POCSO Act pending appeal, applying Supreme Court guidelines on interim relief after substantial sentence served and satisfactory conduct.
Shri Ramesh Chander Goel v. Master Chirag Goel
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside an ex-parte decree due to the applicant's failure to demonstrate sufficient cause for non-appearance, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and proper procedural challenge.
Subhash Chander & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' claims for financial upgradation and pay fixation under ACP and MACP schemes as a representation within eight weeks, without granting immediate relief.