Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
Ion Exchange (India) Ltd v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator for disputes arising out of two contracts, holding that arbitration clauses must be interpreted broadly to include disputes involving questions of fact and that objections to jurisdiction are for the arbitral tribunal to decide.
ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD v. DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator for disputes arising out of two separate contracts, holding that arbitration clauses include disputes involving questions of fact and that jurisdictional objections are to be decided by the arbitrator.
University of Patanjali v. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner university to seek reconsideration by the Empowered Committee on its eligibility for incentives under the Industrial Development Scheme, without deciding on the substantive question of coverage.
Mariam Namubiru & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for visa extension due to procedural deficiencies and incorrect information, directing the petitioner to comply with documentary and procedural requirements before seeking visa conversion and marriage registration.
Shrinath Travel Agency & Anr. v. Infinity Infoway Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunctions restraining defendants from using marks deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'SHRINATH', while rejecting injunction against a dissimilar mark, emphasizing phonetic similarity and likelihood of confusion under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Union of India & Ors. v. WO Balvir Singh (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, holding that the Release Medical Board failed to prove the condition was not attributable to military service.
Union of India & Ors. v. Surg Capt Rajveender Singh Mallhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities developing during service are service-related unless disproved by the employer.
GI STAFFING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMNET CENTRE, DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to grant personal hearing under Section 144B(6)(vii) and directed fresh assessment after providing such hearing.
Peter Graham Wolledge v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a petitioner detained for over six years under the NDPS Act, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention beyond half the minimum sentence entitles bail despite statutory restrictions, upholding the constitutional right to speedy trial and personal liberty.
Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Aareen Healthcare Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction in favor of Macleods Pharmaceuticals, restraining defendants from using the confusingly similar trademark "SAFEFRAC" on identical pharmaceutical products, affirming the triple identity test and priority of user principles.
Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award partially allowing the petitioner’s claim on Defect Liability Period extension and dismissed the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act for lack of patent illegality or conflict with public policy.
Baldev Raj Ahuja v. State, N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld probate of a Will excluding the appellant claiming adoption, holding that the Will was validly executed and attested despite suspicious circumstances raised.
Deept Sarup Agarwal v. S. Randhir Singh Chandhok & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere deposit of sale consideration by a third party does not establish a benami transaction and dismissed the defendants' application to dismiss the suit on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.
N v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted a minor girl to undergo medical termination of pregnancy and held that RMPs need not disclose the minor's identity in mandatory POCSO reports upon request, harmonizing privacy rights with reporting obligations.
Surya Dev Rana & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the pay fixation multiplier under the 2008 Rules applies to the existing basic pay in the pre-revised scale, with upgraded grade pay added thereafter, rejecting the petitioners' claim for applying the multiplier to the upgraded pay scale.
M/S Ratan Kumar Singh v. Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting without prior show cause notice violates natural justice and directed lifting of blacklisting upon deposit of security, emphasizing proportionality and fair hearing in tender-related blacklisting.
Samir Saran v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to grant mandatory personal hearing under Section 144B(6)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, directing a fresh assessment after affording such hearing.
Capt. D.B. Mathur v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that the 1991 Circular on pay fixation for re-employed commissioned officers did not override the fundamental pay linkage rule and was withdrawn by the 1996 Circular, thus denying pay re-fixation to a permanently commissioned officer.
Royal Digital Cable and Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging TDSAT's interim orders permitting disconnection of signals based on prima facie audit findings of non-compliance under TRAI Regulations, holding that such matters are within TDSAT's jurisdiction and not amenable to interference under Article 227.
Dharanidhar Karimojji v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL seeking regulation of digital lending platforms, holding that the RBI has enacted an adequate regulatory framework to protect borrowers and that further government action is underway.