Delhi High Court
61,224 judgments
Dinesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi); Yogesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' conviction for assault but reduced their sentence to the period already served due to the prolonged pendency of the case and their good conduct.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sony Mobile Communications Ind Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that an income tax assessment order framed against a company dissolved by amalgamation is void and cannot be cured as a procedural defect under Section 292B.
Savita Devi v. Lalit Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified the interim maintenance amount payable by the husband to his wife and minor son, emphasizing proper income assessment beyond self-declared affidavits and balancing the parties' circumstances.
Saraswati Printers v. M/S Life Essentials Personal Care Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to dismiss a judgment on admission application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC where the defendant raised triable issues and denied the alleged acknowledgment of liability.
M/S. Antriksh Developers & Promoters v. Anil Kumar Goel
A Commercial Court lacking jurisdiction under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act cannot decide applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC, and such matters must be transferred to a competent civil court for fresh adjudication.
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. v. Geeta Kewalani
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Foot Locker Retail, Inc. restraining the defendant from using the deceptively similar "FOOT LOCKERS" mark, holding that prior registration and use by the plaintiff outweighed the defendant's later registration and claimed prior use.
Flowmore Limited v. M/S Skipper Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award did not suffer from patent illegality or perversity and that the arbitrator's findings were supported by evidence and within jurisdiction.
Progressive Infotech Private Limited v. Ircon International Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the arbitrator due to inordinate delay and ineligibility under the 2015 Arbitration Act amendments, appointing a substitute arbitrator to ensure impartial and expeditious arbitration.
Aayushi Dineshbhai Prajapati v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking an eligibility certificate for FMGE, holding that the petitioner did not fulfill the mandatory continuous two-year study of required subjects at 10+2 level as prescribed by statutory medical education regulations.
M Samundra Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CRPF authorities to decide the petitioner's promotion representation within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition without quashing the impugned orders.
Sanjay v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Others
The Delhi High Court held that any affected party, including children, can file an appeal against eviction orders under the Senior Citizens Act and stayed the eviction pending disposal of such appeal.
Gupta Bros India v. The Press Trust of India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by a party officer interested in the dispute is impermissible, terminated the arbitrator's mandate, and appointed an independent arbitrator to continue the proceedings.
M/S METHODEX SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding that failure of the Dispute Redressal Committee to decide within the stipulated time entitles the party to invoke arbitration notwithstanding subsequent DRC decisions.
Bhuwan Yadav @ Bhanu v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the framing of charge under Section 302 IPC against the petitioner for lack of prima facie intention to cause death and directed framing of charge under Section 304 Part II IPC instead.
Neha Kanwar v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. to decide the petitioner’s compassionate appointment application within four weeks, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal to alleviate financial hardship caused by the death of the employee.
Metcon India Realty and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause survives the No Claims Declaration and appointed an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate the dispute over extra work payments, emphasizing minimal judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
M/S. Antriksh Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd & Ors. v. Shri Suresh Khurana & Ors.
A Commercial Court lacking jurisdiction over a suit cannot decide applications arising from it, and such matters must be transferred to the competent Civil Court for adjudication.
Sandesh Mayekar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed statutory authorities to independently prepare and publish the Dental Council of India electoral rolls with a two-stage process and a thirty-day objection period to ensure transparency and fairness in future elections.
Prime Time India v. Somnath Vij
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's application to strike off issues in a suit for specific performance, holding that a compromise affecting one co-owner's share does not extinguish the rights or disputes of other co-owners, and issues necessary for adjudication must be retained.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bansal Wood Product Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on insurance claim valuation, condoning delay due to COVID-19 and affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.