Delhi High Court
61,224 judgments
M/S HIM LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORT & GENERAL)
The Delhi High Court set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker License for being issued beyond the statutory ninety-day limitation period and held that the petitioner had not acted as Customs Broker for the shipments in question.
Prem Prakash & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Reference Court order denying statutory interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for lack of evidence and reasoned basis, directing expeditious disposal of the reference.
R. Vijay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in a real estate transaction, holding that the allegations disclose cognizable offences requiring investigation.
Akash Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR alleging possession and black-marketing of Remdesivir injections, holding that the allegations disclose cognizable offences and quashing at investigation stage is premature.
S.C. Sapra v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that an employee punished with compulsory retirement without specific pension reduction in the disciplinary order is entitled to full pension and directed payment of arrears deducted in violation of the employer’s circular.
Mohd. Rashid v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant's sentence to the period already served without disturbing his conviction for robbery under Sections 393/34 IPC, considering his age, conduct, and family circumstances.
Anu Balha & Ors. v. ICICI Home Finance & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed Non-Bailable Warrants against appellants in contempt proceedings, directing them to file a reply before the Single Judge determines punishment.
Sh. Rajeev Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case where the minor prosecutrix voluntarily married the accused and denied sexual intercourse, holding continued detention would be a travesty of justice.
Rajiv K Adlakha v. Institute of Company Secretaries of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that complaints against the Director (Discipline) of ICSI cannot be adjudicated by the Board of Discipline and must be referred to the Central Government for independent investigation and decision.
Sajid v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 393/34 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering the long delay and the appellant's reformation.
Chandan Aggarwal v. Kundan Lal Gera & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed limited recall and cross-examination of a witness based on newly surfaced documents not previously known to the party, emphasizing restriction to relevant issues and preventing trial delay.
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Afaq Hussain Ansari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's discharge order, holding that at the charge framing stage, only prima facie case or grave suspicion is required without conducting a mini trial, and remanded the matter for fresh charge framing.
M/S METHODEX SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that arbitration can be validly invoked if the Dispute Redressal Committee fails to decide within the contractual period.
M/S. Antriksh Developers & Promoters v. Shri Vipin Arora
The Delhi High Court held that a Commercial Court lacking jurisdiction under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 cannot decide applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC and must transfer the suit and related applications to the competent Civil Court.
Harpreet Singh and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective promotions and benefits under a discontinued sports incentive policy due to delay and absence of challenge to the subsequent policy.
Inder Singh Solanki v. Devender Sehrawat & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that demarcation directed during abeyance of a contempt order can be recorded and considered in related writ proceedings without taking coercive action against the appellant.
Anju v. Anil
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. due to the petitioner's serious illness and counsel's negligence, restoring the petition for fresh hearing.
Mustafa v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 393, 398, and 34 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering the long delay and appellant's circumstances.
Jai Prakash Dwivedi v. Hirise Facility Management Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that imposing costs as a penalty for filing a suit in a Court lacking territorial jurisdiction is unsustainable if the mistake was genuine, and quashed the cost imposed on the petitioner.
M/S. Antriksh Developers & Promoters Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Shri Vipin Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Commercial Court lacking jurisdiction over a suit cannot decide applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC arising from that suit and directed transfer to the competent Civil Court for fresh adjudication.