Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
T C Goyal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from a property dispute after the parties reached an amicable settlement, holding that such disputes predominantly civil in nature can be resolved by quashing FIR-based proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Dinesh Verma v. State Govt. of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of summons under Section 138 N.I. Act, holding that defenses must be raised at trial and not at the quashing stage.
Har Prasad @ Harish v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 411 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served due to the long trial duration and appellant's good conduct.
Indian Private Ports and Terminals and Anr. v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the parties to conclude conciliation proceedings within six months and disposed of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits, preserving parties' rights to pursue further legal remedies.
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to remove the 'ALPHARD' trademark registrations, holding that the petitioner failed to prove transborder reputation or goodwill in India, and the respondent's registration was bona fide.
Zapsell Retail v. Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that C-forms once issued and utilized cannot be retrospectively cancelled, entitling the petitioner to concessional duty benefits on inter-state sales.
Poonam Sharma v. Director of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the promotion of respondent no. 3 after proper communication and review of ACRs but granted promotion to the petitioner with consequential benefits for procedural lapses and fairness.
Gagan Khokha v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was granted to the accused in a sexual assault case after investigation completion and chargesheet filing, as no further custodial interrogation was necessary.
PSL Infratech Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner cannot extend the force majeure claim period beyond the originally notified dates in a writ petition and must pursue any additional claims through appropriate legal remedies.
Sameer Kaushik v. Sriram Compounds Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a Board Resolution not filed with the plaint and introduced without court's leave cannot be admitted as evidence and must be taken off the record.
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s rectification petitions, holding that international reputation alone does not establish trademark rights in India without evidence of use or goodwill in the Indian market.
Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking implementation of a rejected Seniority Committee decision, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file afresh on a new cause of action.
Bilal Ahmad v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed release of subsistence allowance with interest to a suspended government-aided school teacher, emphasizing timely payment under Rule 116 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973.
Vinita Anthwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide on the BSF paramedical cadre review within three months and dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for expedited action.
Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO, Publications Division Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
The Delhi High Court upheld RTI exemptions protecting national security and denied disclosure of terrorism investigation reports to a death row convict, while directing prison authorities to facilitate access to requested publications.
Hoshiar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to consider the petitioner’s promotion claim as a representation and decide it within four weeks with reasons, ensuring procedural fairness.
Raj Kumar v. Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the dismissal of a bank officer to compulsory retirement on the ground of violation of the principle of parity in punishment among co-delinquents, upholding equality under Article 14.
Satish v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence and co-accused statements justify denial of bail in heinous offences.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Vandana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the insurer was not liable to indemnify the claimants as the insurance policy had expired before the accident, enhancing the compensation amount and granting recovery rights against the vehicle owner and driver.
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to remove the 'ALPHARD' trademark registrations, holding that the petitioner failed to prove transborder reputation or mala fide adoption by the respondent under Indian trademark law.