Delhi High Court

61,224 judgments

Year:

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

03 Feb 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:780

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s rectification petitions, holding that international reputation alone does not establish trademark rights in India without evidence of use or goodwill in the Indian market.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant territoriality principle transborder reputation trade mark rectification Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 11

Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi

03 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:797-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking implementation of a rejected Seniority Committee decision, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file afresh on a new cause of action.

administrative petition_dismissed Seniority List Selection Grade Super Time Scale Seniority Committee

Bilal Ahmad v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

03 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:803

The Delhi High Court directed release of subsistence allowance with interest to a suspended government-aided school teacher, emphasizing timely payment under Rule 116 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973.

labor petition_allowed subsistence allowance suspension government aided school Delhi School Education Rules, 1973

Vinita Anthwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:825-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide on the BSF paramedical cadre review within three months and dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for expedited action.

administrative petition_dismissed cadre review paramedical trades Border Security Force writ mandamus

Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO, Publications Division Ministry of Information and Broadcasting

03 Feb 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:819

The Delhi High Court upheld RTI exemptions protecting national security and denied disclosure of terrorism investigation reports to a death row convict, while directing prison authorities to facilitate access to requested publications.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(a) Section 8(1)(h) Section 24

Hoshiar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:795-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to consider the petitioner’s promotion claim as a representation and decide it within four weeks with reasons, ensuring procedural fairness.

administrative other promotion Border Security Force HIV positive candidate representation

Raj Kumar v. Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.

03 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1078
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the dismissal of a bank officer to compulsory retirement on the ground of violation of the principle of parity in punishment among co-delinquents, upholding equality under Article 14.

service_law petition_allowed Significant Article 14 Doctrine of equality Parity in punishment Departmental inquiry

Satish v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Feb 2023 · Jasmeet Singh · 2023:DHC:1765

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence and co-accused statements justify denial of bail in heinous offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail heinous offence Section 302 IPC co-accused statement

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Vandana & Ors.

03 Feb 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:781

The Delhi High Court held that the insurer was not liable to indemnify the claimants as the insurance policy had expired before the accident, enhancing the compensation amount and granting recovery rights against the vehicle owner and driver.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 insurance policy validity third party insurance liability cover note

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

03 Feb 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:777
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to remove the 'ALPHARD' trademark registrations, holding that the petitioner failed to prove transborder reputation or mala fide adoption by the respondent under Indian trademark law.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act 1999 transborder reputation territoriality principle rectification petition

Sunil Chaurasia v. District and Sessions Judge (HQS)

03 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:963
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an employee not charge sheeted in a vacancy year cannot be denied promotion for that year due to subsequent penalties, directing promotion with retrospective effect from the vacancy year.

administrative petition_allowed Significant promotion disciplinary proceedings charge sheet penalty

SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE SA v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGN & ANR.

03 Feb 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:774

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that claims directed to a composition 'for use in prophylaxis' are patentable, amendments at appellate stage are permissible, and sufficient data and inventive step requirements are met.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patents Act 1970 Section 3(i) Section 59 amendment of claims

Ramesh Prasad Singh v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr

03 Feb 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:881

The Delhi High Court directed fresh demarcation of disputed property No. A-83-A, maintained status quo on possession and construction, and allowed the writ petition with liberty to challenge the demarcation.

property petition_allowed land demarcation Khasra No. 78 Khasra No. 221 Revenue Department

Mohd Abid Hussain v. The State

03 Feb 2023 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2023:DHC:827

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a tutor for sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl, affirming the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act despite partial resiling by witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim presumption of guilt

Asif Ali v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Feb 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:768
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a narcotics accused due to procedural lapses in night-time search under Section 42 NDPS Act and prolonged pre-trial detention violating the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 42 search bail prolonged incarceration

Shobha v. The State

03 Feb 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:919

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry death case, emphasizing cautious exercise of discretion and the principle that bail is the rule, not the exception.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. dowry death Section 304B IPC

Sukhbir and Ors v. Union of India

03 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:796-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking inclusion under the Old Pension Scheme based on recruitment advertisement date, reaffirming eligibility criteria tied to the date of declaration of recruitment results as per the government memorandum.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Old Pension Scheme New Pension Scheme Central Reserve Police Force Office Memorandum 17.02.2020

Kapil alias Lekhraj & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Feb 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:1377

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Shri Chandan Aggarwal v. Shri Krishan Lal and Ors.

02 Feb 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:864
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to record witness statements after an inordinate delay, emphasizing the need for timely steps to summon witnesses under Section 151 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 151 CPC summoning witnesses inherent powers delay in examination

Veena Mahajan v. V.N Verma

02 Feb 2023 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:740

The Delhi High Court held that transferees pendente lite cannot resist execution of a decree for specific performance, affirming the doctrine of lis pendens and denying protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act to subsequent purchasers without superior title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Performance Agreement to Sell Execution of Decree Doctrine of Lis Pendens