Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
Master Medhansh Jhawar @ Madhav v. Rajesh Bhushan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed immediate commencement of treatment and funding for children with rare diseases, emphasizing the State's obligation under the National Policy for Rare Diseases, 2021, and mandated Ministry of Health's active role in clinical trial facilitation.
Bhim Raj v. South Asian University
The Delhi High Court quashed the expulsion orders against Ph.D. students of South Asian University for violation of natural justice and affirmed writ jurisdiction over educational institutions performing public functions.
Anil Kumar v. The GST Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to investigate a fraudulent GST registration obtained in the petitioner's name and dismissed the writ petition while emphasizing the need for cooperation and proper legal remedies.
Ankit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an independent medical re-examination of the petitioner's height to resolve a dispute in recruitment eligibility and allowed participation in the selection process if the petitioner meets the prescribed height criteria.
ORIENTAL INS CO LTD v. DALGANJAN SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the condonation of nearly 13 years’ delay in filing an employees’ compensation claim, emphasizing sufficient cause and liberal construction of labor welfare statutes.
Neeraj v. Arvind Singh
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to outstanding payments under a settlement deed including interest and costs, ordered release of deposited funds, and disposed of the contempt petition with costs.
Jaya Saini v. Lt. Governor, GNCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction and cancellation of allotment of a commercial shop illegally transferred and constructed upon, affirming that freehold conversion rights under the JJR Scheme apply only to original residential allottees.
SRU Steels Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 24 1 Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's reply and directed the Assessing Officer to furnish material and pass a speaking order after a fresh hearing.
Relaxo Footwears Limited v. Nikhil Footwears & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed a commercial suit for design infringement in terms of a settlement where defendants acknowledged plaintiff's exclusive rights and undertook not to infringe, with payment of litigation costs.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized vendors from Kalkaji Mandir premises, allowing only registered street vendors designated spaces, to ensure orderly access and support urban beautification ahead of the G-20 Summit.
Sat Narain Gupta v. Sunil Mittal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause is separable and independent, allowing appointment of an arbitrator despite alleged incompleteness of the main contract.
Asad Mueed & Anr. v. Hammad Ahmed & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief against non-parties under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the Arbitral Tribunal's Section 17 remedy is efficacious and the Court should not intervene post constitution of the Tribunal.
Mukesh Kumar v. M/s. Mother Dairy Fruit Vegetable Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of time to file a written statement beyond the mandatory 120-day period under the Commercial Courts Act, holding that medical illness alone without bona fide explanation does not justify condonation of delay.
Sahil Arora v. Commissioner of Excise Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that personal assets of an LLP partner cannot be attached or directed to be deposited for recovery of dues payable by the LLP under the Delhi Excise Act, setting aside such a direction in the impugned order.
INDUS VALLEY PARTNERS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10-1 & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory minimum period of not less than seven days for filing a reply under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act must be strictly complied with, setting aside reassessment notices issued without adherence to this requirement.
Lumax Ancillary Ltd. and Anr. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Regulation 24 of the SEBI Delisting Regulations, 2009 does not apply to companies delisted by operation of law following a winding-up order, and set aside notices classifying petitioners as promoters based on incorrect application of this regulation.
Soumya Bhattacharya v. Sudhir Kumar Thakur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the National Commission's order permitting withdrawal of an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and directed that pending applications under Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act be heard along with final arguments without separate hearings.
Mishra Infracon Pvt Ltd and Ors v. Palamou Cooperative Housing Society Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the National Commission's order permitting additional affidavits at final hearing but imposed strict limitations and timelines to ensure fairness and restrict new evidence to the scope of the additional documents filed.
DY. CE/C/ JALANDHAR CITY v. M/S SPACECHEM ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging arbitral awards due to delay and procedural defects, holding that the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause to condone the delay under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The Executive Engineer, Noida Central Division Central Public Works Department v. K.L. Monga
The Delhi High Court held that non-filing of the affidavit in the prescribed Statement of Truth format under Order VI Rule 15A CPC is a curable procedural defect and set aside the order striking off the defence.