Delhi High Court
61,459 judgments
Pawan Kumar Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 11(1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act served after the limitation period under the Finance Act, 2021 regime is invalid, setting aside the impugned notice dated 30.06.2021 but served on 16.07.2021.
Dr. Ambika Tyagi v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding appointment and eligibility of an OCI cardholder at AIIMS fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal, and the writ petition before the High Court was not maintainable.
Prem Kumar Rai v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation seeking non-functional promotion and related benefits within four weeks by a reasoned order, without adjudicating on the substantive claim.
SKECHERS U.S.A. INC. & Ors. v. PURE PLAY SPORTS & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a sleeping partner's delayed review application challenging the Taxing Officer's costs order, affirming partners' joint liability and the discretionary nature of costs assessment.
Akash Kukreja v. Lt. Governor, GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction and cancellation of allotment of commercial shops purchased in violation of licence conditions under the JJR Scheme, affirming that freehold conversion benefits apply only to original residential allottees.
Bhavik S. Thakkar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CONCOR lawfully denied waiver of demurrage charges after penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission, affirming that cargo service providers can recover charges despite detention certificates issued by customs.
Trimurti Construction Developers & Builders v. National Building Construction Corporation (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court recorded the parties' compromise and passed a decree in terms of their settlement agreement, disposing of the civil suit concerning construction disputes.
Usha Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 11(1) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated within limitation but served after the limitation period under the Finance Act, 2021 regime is invalid and barred by limitation.
Puschpender v. Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission for re-examination and re-evaluation in LL.B. final year, holding that the petitioner had exhausted the permissible academic period and attempts under University and UGC rules.
Mother Boon Foods Pvt Ltd v. Ready Roti India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 11 petition for appointment of a new arbitrator is not maintainable while an existing sole arbitrator's mandate subsists and must first be terminated under Section 14.
Arvinder Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School
Delhi High Court directed Guru Harkrishan Public School to release the petitioner's terminal benefits and salary arrears as per revised pay norms within specified timelines.
Bennet, Coleman and Company Limited v. Vnow Technologies Private Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to rectify the trademark register by restricting the respondent's 'VNOW' mark, holding that Section 11(5) bars cancellation on certain grounds absent opposition, but the mark violated Section 11(1)(b) justifying rectification.
Braham Singh Mavi v. Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues, holding that the amounts were adjusted against loans and settled by compromise, and that removal from service forfeited pension rights.
Winzo Games Private Limited v. Google LLC & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed WinZO Games' interim injunction against Google's security warning on APK downloads, holding no prima facie trademark infringement or inducement of breach of contract.
Jindal Exports and Imports Private Limited v. Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a quashed DGFT public notice cannot be relied upon to reject Advance Authorization applications and that subsequent notifications cannot be applied retrospectively to take away vested rights.
M/S SHIVAM PLASTIC INDUSTRIES & ORS. v. NIKHIL GUPTA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Trial Court's refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause under Order IX Rule 13 CPC for their non-appearance.
Beena Saraf & Anr v. Sonam Saraf & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a civil petition following an amicable mediation settlement between the parties, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Narender Hooda v. Competent Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the authority of the Court-appointed Administrator to manage maintenance charges and safety compliance at Sagar Apartments, directing enforcement against defaulters and ensuring structural and fire safety under judicial oversight.
Shubham Sharma and Ors. v. State of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' genuine settlement and divorce decree.
Bharat Bhushan v. Naseeb Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that after the death of a landlord, the legal representatives must be impleaded in eviction proceedings, failing which the tenant's revision petition challenging the eviction order abates and must be dismissed.