Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Ved Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that convicts injured during prison labor are entitled to just compensation and medical treatment, including functional prosthesis, and directed the establishment of a committee to assess and award such relief.
Homeopathic Medical College, Abohar v. Union of India Ministry of Ayush
The Delhi High Court quashed denial orders for BHMS course permission due to lack of inspection report and personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice.
Riptinder Jit Singh v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions against Air India Limited are not maintainable post-privatization as it ceases to be a public authority under Article 12, but assured liability remains enforceable in appropriate forums.
Anshul Gupta v. Ajay Gupta
The Delhi High Court quashed a trial court order listing a suit for final hearing without considering the defendant's applications to enter appearance and condone delay, holding that such omission violates natural justice.
Bhim Singh v. Rajiv Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit properly valued for pecuniary jurisdiction requires payment of court fees on the same valuation and remanded the suit for adjudication after allowing the plaintiff to pay deficient court fees.
Manoj Kumari Shukla and Another v. Amol Garg
The Delhi High Court allowed delayed filing of written statement in a civil suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities, subject to payment of costs.
Akhilesh Singh v. Airports Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Airports Authority of India to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks by passing a reasoned order, without adjudicating on the merits.
Emmson Gulf DMCC v. National Cooperative Consumer Federation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's denial of pre-award interest on a Performance Bank Guarantee for failure to give reasons, affirming the tribunal's duty to provide reasoned decisions under the Arbitration Act.
Vinay Kumar GB v. Sudhir Kumar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the 30-day time limit for filing rejoinders under the IPD Rules is directory, allowing rejoinders filed beyond the period to be taken on record in absence of prescribed consequences for delay.
Omkar Realtors and Developers Private Limited v. Adjudicating Authority, Prevention of Money Laundering
The Delhi High Court quashed the provisional attachment order under PMLA against Omkar Realtors as the predicate scheduled offence was closed and the accused discharged, precluding continuation of money laundering proceedings.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Meenu Raisurana and Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the DRT's interim order imposing status quo on possession under SARFAESI Act and directed the DRT to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's application for vacation of stay.
IARI v. Om Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act is maintainable only if the pending industrial dispute is connected to the workman, and set aside the Labour Court award reinstating a probationary employee terminated during an unrelated industrial dispute.
Ram Niwas v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing reconsideration of the petitioner's claim for alternative plot allotment after complete acquisition of his land, emphasizing procedural fairness and opportunity of hearing.
Saurabh Singal v. Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi through Commissioner
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue to process a GST refund claim in favor of the petitioner as per the appellate order, holding that a review order directing filing of an appeal does not stay the refund.
Sachin Joshi v. Adjudicating Authority, Prevention of Money Laundering
The Delhi High Court quashed the provisional attachment order under PMLA and ordered release of properties after discharging the accused in the predicate offence, affirming that money laundering proceedings cannot continue without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Simi Dua v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court set aside the bank’s order including an advocate in the IBA caution list for lack of a reasoned order and directed reconsideration in accordance with natural justice.
Suresh Kumar Lahiri v. Rakesh Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that a party proceeded ex parte but present in court must be given an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses before evidence is closed, and directed the Trial Court accordingly.
Rajesh Kumar v. Sindhi Academy & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the reversion of the appellant to a lower post due to non-fulfillment of essential qualifications and non-compliance with recruitment rules.
PRPL Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed the provisional attachment of properties under PMLA against a lender after the predicate scheduled offence was closed and the accused discharged, affirming that PMLA proceedings cannot continue without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Bell Finvest (India) Limited & Ors. v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing guarantors to pay outstanding loan dues, affirming the arbitrator's contract interpretation and limiting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.