Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
Neeraj Walia v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the allotment of 21 shops at Punjabi Bagh Stadium, holding that the allotment complied with tender conditions and that the shops must be used in accordance with the Master Plan.
CLIX Capital Services Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-74
The Delhi High Court quashed delayed penalty proceedings under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, holding that initiation of such proceedings must occur within a reasonable time to prevent abuse of limitation and ensure natural justice.
Kumar Sanjay Jha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed service of a remand order on the petitioner before proceeding with revisional trial and restrained action until then, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
SMT. Krishna and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that death caused while crossing railway tracks does not constitute an 'untoward incident' under the Railways Act.
Chander Mohan v. Tejinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's conditional leave to defend in summary suits under Order 37 CPC, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the imposed security deposit and decrees passed for non-compliance.
Vending Updates (India) Private Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the refusal of trademark registration after the prior mark holder Amazon Technologies gave consent for registration of the appellant's mark.
Vikram v. Border Security Force and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to allow the petitioner to undergo physical tests for the post of Head Constable (Radio Mechanic) and consider him for appointment if found fit.
Balwan Singh and Another v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed a second appeal and the application for condonation of over eight years' delay in refiling, holding that such excessive delay without sufficient cause cannot be condoned.
Sudhir Kumar v. CBI
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against a panel advocate for submitting a title opinion with minor discrepancies, holding that mere professional lapses without tangible evidence of conspiracy do not justify criminal prosecution.
Rashtriye Bhawan Nirman Sangh v. Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Board to process and release pending incentives to the petitioner trade union for applications submitted during the operative period of the incentive scheme, despite the scheme's subsequent discontinuation.
Bishwajeet Singh & Ors. v. Bikramjit Singh Through LRs. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an executing court cannot order partition by metes and bounds contrary to a final decree for sale by public auction, and the decree remains binding unless modified by an appellate court.
Nabbo Singh @ Naboya Nath v. Jitender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging eviction for delay in filing leave to defend beyond the statutory period and held no triable issues existed regarding ownership or site plan.
Ghanshyam Pandey v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of a Look Out Circular against a former director under SFIO investigation for alleged corporate fraud, balancing public economic interest against the petitioner’s right to travel.
Principal Commissioner, CGST, Delhi-South v. M/s Emaar MGF Land Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that extended limitation under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 applies only in cases of deliberate suppression or intent to evade tax, and dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging the Tribunal's order rejecting demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit and service tax.
Mahinder Singh v. M/S Cosco Blossoms Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed limited further cross-examination of an admitted document by recalling an elderly witness, emphasizing strict adherence to the scope of the document and timely completion of examination.
Neeraj Sharma v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate disqualified for uploading an incorrect document must be given an opportunity to rectify the defect before cancellation, directing participation in a subsequent recruitment batch without seniority benefits.
Rajesh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking family pension as not maintainable since the petitioner had already foregone her claims in an earlier order and pension benefits were granted to the children.
Harshpal Singh Sawhney & Ors. v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld CBSE's regulatory authority to curb commercialization in schools affiliated with it and disposed of the PIL after directing CBSE to conclude pending proceedings against schools charging franchise fees.
Debjyoti Ghosh v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of thesis submission deadline beyond prescribed academic ordinance limits, holding that COVID-19 lockdown does not automatically extend academic timelines and academic bodies’ discretion in granting extensions is not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness.
Leotronic Scales Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a blacklisting order against a tenderer for failure to provide a valid show-cause notice and opportunity of personal hearing, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in administrative blacklisting.