Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
M/S GRAND SLAM FITNESS PVT LTD & ANR v. M/S OMSA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that objections to evidence beyond pleadings should be raised during trial and refused to strike off paragraphs of affidavit evidence prematurely.
M/S MANRAJ ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate contractual disputes, clarifying the validity of panel appointments under Section 12(5).
Eshita Bashist v. The Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed conditional registration and examination of a student in a private unaided school upon payment of outstanding fees and condonation of attendance shortage by the Council.
M/S MANRAJ ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes, clarifying procedural compliance under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kedar Sharma and Others v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claims for ACP/MACP benefits as a representation and decide them in accordance with the Supreme Court precedent within a stipulated time.
Alankar Apartment Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice and order under the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's evidence and directed a fresh hearing and exercise by the Assessing Officer.
Shubham Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a provisionally allotted seat due to non-payment of seat acceptance fee within the stipulated timeline but allowed the petitioner to continue admission against a supernumerary seat created pursuant to interim relief.
Harcharan Singh v. Director of Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the School's review petition, affirming that denial of defence evidence vitiated the disciplinary inquiry and ordering reinstatement of the petitioner despite delay.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 19(1), DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s application challenging recovery under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, granting interim relief against coercive recovery pending appeal.
Sanjay Sudan v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax deducted at source not deposited by the employer, nor can the revenue adjust such demand against the assessee's refund under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Khushbu Rana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compassionate employment as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Sunny Mittal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a Lock Out Circular against a guarantor not named as accused, permitting his travel abroad subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and protection of recovery interests.
Capt. Mahinder Pal Singh Pujji v. Air India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition against Air India on maintainability grounds following its privatization, holding that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to privatized entities no longer classified as public authorities.
Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman RBI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed Citibank and RBI to ensure accountability in banking communications and collection practices after Citibank apologized and agreed to reverse disputed charges against the petitioner.
Globus Real Infra Pvt Ltd v. Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals II
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST refund denial case for reconsideration of the impact of a resolution plan terminating a lease agreement on GST liability, affirming that GST liability arises irrespective of non-payment but must be examined in light of insolvency resolution.
Dilip K Ghosh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of an accused in a corruption case, holding that bail should not be granted at the initial stage of investigation where custodial interrogation is necessary and the accused has not fully cooperated.
PALMTREE INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 19(3) DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated on mere suspicion without sufficient material and must comply with natural justice safeguards.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Victory Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's recall of its dismissal order due to non-receipt of hearing notice by the assessee and dismissed the revenue's appeal for lack of substantial question of law.
Sonu Verma v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that presumption under Section 113B Indian Evidence Act is subject to trial and bail can be granted if no risk of tampering or influencing witnesses is shown.
Taranjeet Singh Bagga v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused under Section 447 Companies Act who was not arrested during investigation but taken into custody post summons, clarifying that stringent bail bars under Section 212(6) do not apply in such cases per Supreme Court precedent.