Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
Ramakant Shandilya v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Container Corporation of India Limited to decide the petitioner's pending service appeal against removal within six weeks by passing a reasoned order.
CT/CD Siddant Sindhu v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to forward the petitioner's appeal to the competent authority and restrained coercive action pending its decision, holding that returning the appeal was improper.
Capt. Gurdeep Singh Tiwana & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions against Air India Limited are not maintainable post-privatization as it ceases to be a 'Public Authority' under Article 12, dismissing the petitions while allowing the claimants to seek remedies in appropriate forums.
Shiwang Tripathi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that apprentices without a contractual obligation for employment under Section 22(2) of the Apprentices Act, 1961, have no right to absorption as regular employees, and non-absorption does not amount to discrimination.
M. A. Ansari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed pensionary benefits to a dismissed Air Force personnel recognizing his long service and exceptional circumstances despite statutory bar on pension post dismissal.
Prabhat Das v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary penalty imposed on a CISF constable for non-disclosure of arrest, holding that police intimation and acquittal negate the charge of concealment.
Asif Sammi v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding the dying declaration reliable and supported by corroborative evidence, and emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and risk of witness tampering.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SATISH CHANDER MADHOK & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award of over Rs. 10 lakh, affirming that just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act can be based on credible oral and documentary evidence and rejecting insurer's challenge to various heads of damages.
G.D. Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration after holding that the petitioner-institution was denied a fair opportunity of hearing and inspection report before adverse decisions on its intake capacity were taken under the National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020.
Mangla Kamla Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the denial of admission permission to a homoeopathic college for failure to provide the inspection report and opportunity of hearing, emphasizing adherence to natural justice.
Ved Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that convicts injured during prison labor are entitled to just compensation and medical treatment, including functional prosthesis, and directed the establishment of a committee to assess and award such relief.
Homeopathic Medical College, Abohar v. Union of India Ministry of Ayush
The Delhi High Court quashed denial orders for BHMS course permission due to lack of inspection report and personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice.
Riptinder Jit Singh v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions against Air India Limited are not maintainable post-privatization as it ceases to be a public authority under Article 12, but assured liability remains enforceable in appropriate forums.
Anshul Gupta v. Ajay Gupta
The Delhi High Court quashed a trial court order listing a suit for final hearing without considering the defendant's applications to enter appearance and condone delay, holding that such omission violates natural justice.
Bhim Singh v. Rajiv Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit properly valued for pecuniary jurisdiction requires payment of court fees on the same valuation and remanded the suit for adjudication after allowing the plaintiff to pay deficient court fees.
Manoj Kumari Shukla and Another v. Amol Garg
The Delhi High Court allowed delayed filing of written statement in a civil suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities, subject to payment of costs.
Akhilesh Singh v. Airports Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Airports Authority of India to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks by passing a reasoned order, without adjudicating on the merits.
Emmson Gulf DMCC v. National Cooperative Consumer Federation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's denial of pre-award interest on a Performance Bank Guarantee for failure to give reasons, affirming the tribunal's duty to provide reasoned decisions under the Arbitration Act.
Vinay Kumar GB v. Sudhir Kumar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the 30-day time limit for filing rejoinders under the IPD Rules is directory, allowing rejoinders filed beyond the period to be taken on record in absence of prescribed consequences for delay.
Omkar Realtors and Developers Private Limited v. Adjudicating Authority, Prevention of Money Laundering
The Delhi High Court quashed the provisional attachment order under PMLA against Omkar Realtors as the predicate scheduled offence was closed and the accused discharged, precluding continuation of money laundering proceedings.