Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Novartis AG & Anr. v. Novaegis (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction against the defendant's use of the deceptively similar mark 'NOVAEGIS', holding it infringed the plaintiffs' registered trademark 'NOVARTIS' under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Atcom Technology Co. Ltd. v. Rahul Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's order allowing belated filing of documents during the COVID-19 pandemic, holding that reasonable cause was shown and Original Side Rules do not apply to district-level Commercial Courts.
Sunil v. Delhi Subordinate Selection Service Board (Government of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner was issued an admit card, appeared in the examination, and failed to qualify.
TTK Prestige Ltd v. K K And Company Delhi Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to TTK Prestige Ltd restraining defendant no.1 from using the 'PRESTIGE' trademark on gas stoves, holding that the defendant failed to prove continuous prior use under Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Ahsan Ali Lone v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court directed Jamia Millia Islamia to admit a meritorious candidate despite delayed fee payment caused by technical issues, emphasizing fairness over procedural technicalities.
Attaullah Khan v. Satyawati College & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of vigilance clearance for promotion where the petitioner had no knowledge of pending criminal cases and left the applicability of amended recruitment rules to separate proceedings.
National Highways Builders Federation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 18.08.2022 Office Memorandum clarifying that debarment of contractors under GFR 2017 can proceed without awaiting criminal case conclusion if sufficient material exists, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/S S.G. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that reassessment without fresh material and without mandatory procedural compliance under the Income Tax Act, 1961 is invalid.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Sterling Agro Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s deletion of disallowance under Section 80IA(5), ruling that losses set off prior to the initial assessment year cannot be notionally carried forward against eligible business profits for deduction computation.
Bhupinder Singh & Anr. v. Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking C&AG audit of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and GHPS Society, holding that statutory remedies under the DSG Act must be exhausted and the C&AG cannot audit voluntary bodies without due process.
M/S GRAND SLAM FITNESS PVT LTD & ANR v. M/S OMSA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that objections to evidence beyond pleadings should be raised during trial and refused to strike off paragraphs of affidavit evidence prematurely.
M/S MANRAJ ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate contractual disputes, clarifying the validity of panel appointments under Section 12(5).
Eshita Bashist v. The Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed conditional registration and examination of a student in a private unaided school upon payment of outstanding fees and condonation of attendance shortage by the Council.
M/S MANRAJ ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes, clarifying procedural compliance under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kedar Sharma and Others v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claims for ACP/MACP benefits as a representation and decide them in accordance with the Supreme Court precedent within a stipulated time.
Alankar Apartment Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice and order under the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's evidence and directed a fresh hearing and exercise by the Assessing Officer.
Shubham Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a provisionally allotted seat due to non-payment of seat acceptance fee within the stipulated timeline but allowed the petitioner to continue admission against a supernumerary seat created pursuant to interim relief.
Harcharan Singh v. Director of Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the School's review petition, affirming that denial of defence evidence vitiated the disciplinary inquiry and ordering reinstatement of the petitioner despite delay.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 19(1), DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s application challenging recovery under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, granting interim relief against coercive recovery pending appeal.
Sanjay Sudan v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax deducted at source not deposited by the employer, nor can the revenue adjust such demand against the assessee's refund under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.