Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sudip Kohli v. Residents Welfare Association Dashrath Puri
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s rejection of the petitioner’s application to dismiss a suit by the Residents Welfare Association claiming a public road, holding that factual disputes over ownership and public use require trial and are not barred by res judicata or writ petition withdrawal.
Ashkaran Ojha v. Shivam Kumar
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by awarding loss of income, increased attendant charges, and higher non-pecuniary damages while upholding the functional disability assessment.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Durgesh Kumar and Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan dispute where respondents defaulted and failed to participate in arbitration.
Amaltas Ayurveda v. The Director General Directorate General of Health Services Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a healthcare services agreement, allowing jurisdictional objections to be decided by the arbitrator.
Shree Ghantakaran Pipes Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Rohit Garg
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for using a deceptively similar trademark "APPI SMONIKA GOLD" infringing the plaintiffs' registered mark "MONICA GOLD", proceeding ex-parte due to defendant's non-appearance.
Mr. Jugal Wadawa, Mr. Raghav Goyal, Mr. Rishab Bhalla and Mr. Siddharta Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of certain building regulation relaxations under the Master Plan for Delhi, 2021, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the building plan approval and construction on an adjoining plot.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. BANSAL BROTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration clause, despite non-appearance of respondents.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. N.P. ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PARTNERS AND ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration clause, despite respondents' non-appearance.
Tata Capital Limited v. M/S Siraj Tools Industries & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from loan agreements, allowing jurisdictional objections and counter-claims to be raised before the arbitrator.
M/S Ockleaf Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Ram Avtar Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a struck-off company seeking possession of property based on sale deeds declared null and void, holding the suit barred by res judicata and abuse of process.
Ritu Aggarwal @ Aditi v. State
The High Court held that limitation under Section 468 CrPC is computed from the date of complaint filing, not cognizance, and discharged the accused for lack of prima facie case despite rejecting the limitation plea.
S.G. WINES & Anr. v. SAB MILLER INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal complaints filed under the old name of a company after its name change are maintainable and refused to quash proceedings on this technical ground at the summoning stage.
Sapan Dhawan v. Des Raj Sethi
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for a suit on post-dated cheques runs from the cheque date, not settlement date, and dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's refusal to reject the suit on limitation grounds.
Chandra Prakash v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the suspension of an Insolvency Professional for non-disclosure of related party transactions and non-approval of valuation fees, emphasizing strict compliance with IBC disclosure and approval norms.
Meena Gill v. Pradeep Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order for criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC, dismissing the petition challenging the order and affirming the existence of a prima facie case.
Courts on Its Own Motion in Re: Suicide Committed by Sushant Rohilla v. Respondent
The Delhi High Court directed the Bar Council of India to reconsider mandatory 70% attendance norms for law students, emphasizing reasonable regulations that do not debar students from exams and account for practical learning and mental health.
G.S. Industries v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST, Delhi (West)
The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner cannot review or overturn an appellate order under Section 107(2) CGST Act and quashed the order setting aside the refund sanction for procedural non-compliance where the appellate order was unchallenged.
Raja Jaswant Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Raja Jaswant Singh under Section 37 NDPS Act, holding that stringent conditions for bail in commercial quantity narcotics cases were not met given his criminal antecedents and prima facie involvement.
State v. Santosh Yadav
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to failure of prosecution to prove the survivor's minority and established consent, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.
Subhash Chander Bajaj v. Inderjit Bajaj
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a family settlement memorandum recording prior oral partition, ruling it did not require registration and dismissing the appeal challenging the Single Judge's order setting aside the arbitral award invalidating the settlement.