Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Shrawan v. State

21 Jan 2026 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2026:DHC:484

The High Court upheld the conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC, ruling that absence of medical signs of forcible intercourse does not negate non-consensual sexual assault when supported by consistent testimony and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC consent forensic evidence

Manarajiya & Ors. v. Union of India

21 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:532

The High Court allowed the appeal holding that absence of a journey ticket does not negate bona fide passenger status and remanded the matter for awarding death compensation under the Railways Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act bona fide passenger death compensation Railways Claims Tribunal

Jakir Hussain v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:519

Anticipatory bail granted to accused due to lack of corroborative medical evidence and plausible false implication claim in a gunshot injury case.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail point blank firing tattooing blackening

Ram Swaroop Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:514
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The High Court allowed the petition to recall a prosecution witness for cross-examination after the accused were unrepresented, emphasizing the necessity of legal assistance for a fair trial and the court's duty to prevent gross injustice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 CrPC cross-examination legal representation fair trial

Pratima Mahajan v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:512

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging a Sessions Court revision order and refused to direct police investigation, holding that inherent powers cannot override statutory prohibitions on second revision proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Article 227 Constitution of India revision jurisdiction second revision prohibition

Mariyam @ Salma v. State (NCT of Delhi)

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:505

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application under the NDPS Act, holding that no change in circumstances justified bail after the accused was caught with contraband and substantial recovery was made.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail NDPS Act conscious possession twin test

Suphiyan Ali v. State of GNCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:504

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case due to serious doubts arising from CCTV evidence and delay in lodging the FIR, emphasizing protection of liberty where prosecution case is questionable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail robbery toy gun CCTV footage

Kaushlender Bhardwaj v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:510

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on compromise between parties and minor injuries, holding that criminal proceedings need not be pursued in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 279 IPC Section 337 IPC compromise

Avtar v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:506

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a physically challenged accused in a murder case, holding that his disability and lack of conclusive evidence raised serious doubts about his involvement.

criminal bail_granted Significant bail Section 302 IPC physical disability amputation

Walmark Holdings Limited v. Fortis Healthcare Limited

21 Jan 2026 · Amit Bansal · 2026:DHC:515
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that filing a petition based on forged documents and false affidavits warrants initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without mandatory preliminary inquiry, directing complaint against Walmark officials for fraud on the Court.

civil other Significant Section 340 CrPC forged documents false affidavit Section 9 Arbitration Act

Pahalman Budha Magar v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2026 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2356
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a Nepalese accused in an NDPS case, holding that non-supply of grounds of arrest violates Article 22(1) of the Constitution and vitiates the arrest despite commercial quantity of narcotics involved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution of India NDPS Act

Lokesh alias Manish v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

21 Jan 2026 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2026:DHC:509

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused due to the police's failure to communicate the mandatory grounds of arrest, holding such non-compliance vitiates the arrest and remand under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of BNSS.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution of India Section 47 BNSS bail

Habibur Molla @ Sonu v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

21 Jan 2026 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2026:DHC:508

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the applicant, holding that failure to inform the arrestee of the grounds of arrest violates Article 22(1) of the Constitution and vitiates the arrest and remand.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 22(1) Constitution of India grounds of arrest illegal arrest right to bail

Saud Nasir and Anr v. Late Mohammad Sultan through his LR and Anr

21 Jan 2026 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2026:DHC:511

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging recording of witness evidence in absence of counsel where the witness consented and counsel failed to appear, upholding the trial court's order.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India recording of evidence absence of counsel witness consent

S AND S CONSTRUCTION CO v. UNION OF INDIA

21 Jan 2026 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2026:DHC:493
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s contractual claims, emphasizing the limited scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and the necessity of proving actual damages under Section 73 of the Contract Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 73 Indian Contract Act Arbitral award

National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases v. Ms. Shweta & Ors.

20 Jan 2026 · Anil Ksheterpal; Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:499-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order directing appointment against a non-existent reserved vacancy, holding that an error in recruitment notice does not create a vested right or entitlement to age relaxation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment notice error reserved category vacancy age relaxation vested right

Pramod Kumar v. M/S Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd.

20 Jan 2026 · Anil Ksheterpal; Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:464-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a Commercial Court must return the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC when a dispute is non-commercial and lacks jurisdiction, and cannot dismiss the suit on that ground.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VII Rule 10 CPC jurisdiction commercial dispute

Kawaljit Kaur v. State NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:476

The Delhi High Court held that civil disputes over CCTV cameras are not maintainable under criminal writ jurisdiction but directed the State to provide police protection to the petitioners apprehending threats.

criminal petition_dismissed writ petition criminal writ jurisdiction CCTV camera right to privacy

Adil v. The State of NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:475

Anticipatory bail granted to accused in absence of incriminating evidence despite antecedents and telephonic links with co-accused, as no custodial interrogation was necessary.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 134 BNS Section 303(2) BNS

Himanshu Nayak v. The State NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:473

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused on the ground of parity with co-accused having similar role despite a delay in arrest.

criminal appeal_allowed bail parity in bail absconding Section 109(1) BNS