Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
M/S SISOTIYA EDUCATION SOCIETY REGD. & ANR. v. INTROMAX FURNITURE SYSTEM
The Delhi High Court held that imposing a condition to deposit the entire decretal amount as a pre-condition to set aside an ex parte decree is not mandatory and must be reasonable, especially where the defendant was not properly served.
Joseph Varghese v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification of official deployment lists before deciding entitlement to COVID-19 ex-gratia compensation, emphasizing that only government-deployed COVID-19 duty personnel qualify under the Cabinet Decision.
Accelerate Productx Ventures Private Limited v. Reejh Essentials
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes under a valid arbitration clause to DIAC arbitration despite the respondent's non-appearance, exercising jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S SOPHISTICATED INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS ANALYTIC LABS (P) LTD. v. M/S DHAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in contracts executed before the MSME Act govern dispute resolution, rejecting retrospective application of the MSME Act and appointing an arbitrator accordingly.
Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide on the restoration of 200 CRPF posts within three months, holding that creation or abolition of posts requires government approval and the petition was premature pending such decision.
Master Pratham Singh Latwal v. Guru Gobind Singh Govt Hospital and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that claims of medical negligence require factual inquiry in appropriate forums and dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for alleged delayed ROP screening, awarding limited ex gratia relief instead.
Pragya Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Cosmo Ferrites Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the award did not suffer from patent illegality or procedural infirmities.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMA JAIN & ORS
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing compensation based on averaged income from two assessment years and held that a widow receiving nominal salary for household expenses remains a dependent for motor accident claim purposes.
Smt. Gomati v. G.T.B. Hospital
Termination of a daily wage worker engaged against leave vacancies without continuous employment exceeding 240 days does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and such termination is lawful.
Allengers Medical Systems Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disqualification in a medical equipment tender, holding that judicial review is limited to preventing arbitrariness and the petitioner failed to meet essential technical specifications.
Ajay Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the DG BSF to decide the petitioners' pending representation for MACP benefits within four weeks and communicate the decision in writing.
Sh. Anil Kumar v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s past service in a judicially fixed Grade Pay must be counted for MACP financial upgradation eligibility, allowing the writ petition.
SMT RUBY THUKRAL & ANR. v. SH AJAY ARORA
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to challenge a disputed family settlement and held that an exclusive jurisdiction clause cannot oust the Court's jurisdiction when the settlement's validity is contested.
Shishpal Singh v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to clarify whether the petitioner’s transfer complied with the software-based transfer policy and to provide reasons if it did not, while emphasizing limited judicial interference in paramilitary postings.
Manish Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed constitution of an independent Medical Board to reassess the petitioner's eyesight due to conflicting medical reports, with the Board's decision to be final and binding.
HI TECH SWEET WATER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD
Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of an arbitrator charging excessive fees beyond statutory limits and appointed a substitute arbitrator to ensure fair and timely arbitration proceedings.
Ravinder Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to convene the Departmental Promotion Committee within eight weeks to consider the petitioner's promotion, emphasizing the legal obligation to hold DPCs regularly and without undue delay.
Darshan Singh and Anr v. M/s Capital Land Builder Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned execution order dated 02.09.2022 by consent, restored execution proceedings to the prior stage, and directed expeditious disposal of objections before coercive action.
Rajesh Arora v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court directed ICSI to prescribe transparent criteria and tenure for appointment and rotation of members before constituting the Expert Group on Secretarial Standards.
Worknest Business Centre LLP & Anr. v. MS Worknests
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the registered proprietor of the trademark 'WORKNEST', holding that the defendant's later use of the deceptively similar mark 'WORKNESTS' infringed the plaintiff's exclusive rights arising from registration on a proposed-to-be-used basis.