Delhi High Court

94,906 judgments

Year:

FDC INDIA v. FDC LIMITED

20 Mar 2023 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:2020-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the amendment of the plaint to correct trademark registration status, dismissing the appeal and directing consideration of related perjury and stay applications.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint interim injunction trademark registration

Sonu Kumar, BPM & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Mar 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:1966-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that the benefit of its judgment reinstating terminated employees must be extended to all similarly situated persons, including those not party to the original writ petition, directing reinstatement on the principle of 'no work no pay.'

administrative petition_allowed Significant judgment in rem similarly situated persons reinstatement no work no pay

Ashok Kumar Bajoria v. GAIL India Limited

20 Mar 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:2141
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act for appointment of an arbitrator filed beyond three years from refusal to appoint is barred by limitation and dismissed the petition.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Section 11 Arbitration Act limitation period Article 137 Limitation Act appointment of arbitrator

The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd.

20 Mar 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:2502-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision invalidating an income tax assessment order issued without a mandatory Document Identification Number as per CBDT Circular No. 19/2019, holding such omission to be a jurisdictional error not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Document Identification Number CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 Income Tax Act Section 119 Income Tax Act Section 292B

Usha International Limited v. Tarun Arora Trading as Krishan Enterprises

20 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:2005

The Delhi High Court decreed the trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's compliance affidavit confirming no infringing stock, negating the need for delivery up orders.

civil appeal_dismissed trademark infringement compliance affidavit delivery up costs and damages

Siddhartha @ Raja v. State

20 Mar 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Poonam A. Bamba · 2023:DHC:2031-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for gang rape and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial, forensic, and electronic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence DNA profiling CDR analysis gang rape

Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

20 Mar 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:2030
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition restoring a Chartered Accountant’s membership and seniority after condoning a short delay in fee payment during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

professional_regulatory petition_allowed Significant Institute of Chartered Accountants of India membership fee Certificate of Practice COVID-19 pandemic

Anurag Saxena v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1997-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 45

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to furnish the Court of Inquiry report to the petitioner and provide an opportunity to reply before deciding the show cause notice under BSF and CCS Conduct Rules.

administrative other show cause notice Court of Inquiry natural justice Border Security Force Rules, 1969

Pankaj Prajapati v. The Chairman, Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors.

20 Mar 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1992

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DSSSB recruitment process, holding that separate posts and uniform examination conditions do not constitute discrimination.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment process Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board discrimination examination mechanism

Vijay v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1998-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent Medical Board to resolve conflicting eyesight assessments of a BSF recruitment candidate, making the Board's report final and binding.

administrative other Review Medical Examination Defective Distant Vision Medical Board Recruitment

Nabinagar Power Generating Company Ltd. v. AMR India Ltd.

20 Mar 2023 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:1976-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting NPGC's counterclaims as barred by limitation, affirming that limitation periods in arbitration run from the cause of action and are not extended by post-dispute negotiations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 counterclaims arbitral award

Mehandi Hasan v. District Magistrate, North-East Delhi & Anr.

20 Mar 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:2029

Delhi High Court directs Claims Commissioner to expedite and transparently process compensation claims of North-East Delhi riot victims in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines and GNCTD ex-gratia scheme.

administrative other Significant North-East Delhi riots Claims Commissioner compensation ex-gratia relief

Anand Divine Developers Pvt Ltd v. Sohan Bahadur Gurong

20 Mar 2023 · Prateek Jalan · 2023:DHC:2055

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that a bank's No Objection Certificate was not required for surrender of property under a buy-back MoU, dismissing the petition challenging the award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 No Objection Certificate Tripartite Agreement

Hemant Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.

20 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1965-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pay parity under the 7th CPC for a Lab Assistant in SSB, holding that pay fixation and cadre review are executive functions and different entry qualifications justify differential pay scales without violating Articles 14 and 16.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant 7th Central Pay Commission Pay fixation Cadre review Laboratory Assistant

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Windlas Biotech Ltd & Anr.

20 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:2006

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a trademark injunction, holding that contempt jurisdiction is limited to the exact terms of the decree and does not permit re-examination of trademark or copyright infringement claims.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court civil contempt wilful disobedience permanent injunction

Rohit Gupta v. Vijay Kumar Verma HUF

20 Mar 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:2027

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretionary order directing interim compensation under Section 143A of the NI Act, holding that unsubstantiated claims of loan repayment do not preclude such compensation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 143A NI Act interim compensation discretionary power bounced cheque

Ishrar Ahmad @ Pahadi v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

20 Mar 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:2017
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case after over six years of incarceration, applying Supreme Court guidelines on bail in delayed trials despite statutory rigors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail in NDPS cases prolonged incarceration

Sh Rameshwar Jaiswal v. Ms Tojo Vikas International Pvt Ltd

20 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:2085

The Delhi High Court held that secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act can only be admitted after establishing the non-availability of the original document during trial, setting aside the Trial Court's premature rejection of a photocopy of a Property Development Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 65 Indian Evidence Act secondary evidence admissibility of documents proof of documents

Ratul Puri v. State Bank of India

20 Mar 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:2111
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a wilful defaulter cannot be declared or reported without serving the adverse order, and directed removal of the petitioner's name from the defaulter list as SBI chose not to act on the adverse order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant wilful defaulter Review Committee order RBI Master Circular credit information bureau

Microtek Leasing and Finance Pvt Ltd v. Nisha Chhikara

20 Mar 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:2144

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for Specific Performance filed beyond three years from the fixed date of performance without valid extension is barred by limitation, and failure to obtain statutory permissions does not extend limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Performance Limitation Article 54 Limitation Act No Objection Certificate