Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Pankaj Prajapati v. The Chairman, Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DSSSB recruitment process, holding that separate posts and uniform examination conditions do not constitute discrimination.
Vijay v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent Medical Board to resolve conflicting eyesight assessments of a BSF recruitment candidate, making the Board's report final and binding.
Nabinagar Power Generating Company Ltd. v. AMR India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting NPGC's counterclaims as barred by limitation, affirming that limitation periods in arbitration run from the cause of action and are not extended by post-dispute negotiations.
Mehandi Hasan v. District Magistrate, North-East Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs Claims Commissioner to expedite and transparently process compensation claims of North-East Delhi riot victims in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines and GNCTD ex-gratia scheme.
Anand Divine Developers Pvt Ltd v. Sohan Bahadur Gurong
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that a bank's No Objection Certificate was not required for surrender of property under a buy-back MoU, dismissing the petition challenging the award.
Hemant Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pay parity under the 7th CPC for a Lab Assistant in SSB, holding that pay fixation and cadre review are executive functions and different entry qualifications justify differential pay scales without violating Articles 14 and 16.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Windlas Biotech Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a trademark injunction, holding that contempt jurisdiction is limited to the exact terms of the decree and does not permit re-examination of trademark or copyright infringement claims.
Rohit Gupta v. Vijay Kumar Verma HUF
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretionary order directing interim compensation under Section 143A of the NI Act, holding that unsubstantiated claims of loan repayment do not preclude such compensation.
Ishrar Ahmad @ Pahadi v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case after over six years of incarceration, applying Supreme Court guidelines on bail in delayed trials despite statutory rigors.
Sh Rameshwar Jaiswal v. Ms Tojo Vikas International Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act can only be admitted after establishing the non-availability of the original document during trial, setting aside the Trial Court's premature rejection of a photocopy of a Property Development Agreement.
Ratul Puri v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that a wilful defaulter cannot be declared or reported without serving the adverse order, and directed removal of the petitioner's name from the defaulter list as SBI chose not to act on the adverse order.
Microtek Leasing and Finance Pvt Ltd v. Nisha Chhikara
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for Specific Performance filed beyond three years from the fixed date of performance without valid extension is barred by limitation, and failure to obtain statutory permissions does not extend limitation.
Vishal Khandelwal v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. due to his existing judicial custody in a related criminal case involving conspiracy and cheating.
Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person v. SMT. SHASHI BALA .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt liability arising from dishonoured cheques.
Satyendra Kumar Bind v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DG BSF to decide the petitioner’s post-confirmation statutory petition under Section 117(2) BSF Act within four weeks, emphasizing timely adjudication and judicial enforcement of statutory duties.
Subhash Chand Jain & Anr. v. Savita Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession and rent against appellants who admitted tenancy, dismissed their application to recall a consent judgment based on false allegations against their counsel, and initiated contempt proceedings for filing false affidavits.
Sh Rameshwar Jaiswal v. M/s Tojo Vikas International Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that permission to lead secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act must be granted only after the party adduces evidence during trial establishing the non-availability of the original document, setting aside the Trial Court's premature rejection of such evidence.
Prerna Bhatnagar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to adjudicate the petitioner's representation concerning forged sale deeds and illegal constructions within six months, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Ravinder Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation for ACPs/MACPs benefits within eight weeks, applying relevant precedents and extending the decision to all similarly situated persons.
Purushottam Singhal Proprietor Ms. Prime Cable Industries v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a trademark application cannot be deemed abandoned under Section 21(2) of the Trade Marks Act without valid proof of service of the opposition notice, and set aside the rejection of the appellant's application for lack of such proof.