Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
SML LIMITED v. SULPHUR CROP CARE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit based on an amicable settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, binding the parties to undertakings acknowledging patent validity and non-infringement.
Mohammed Isham v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to consider the petitioner’s representation for promotion before constituting the Departmental Promotion Committee, ensuring procedural fairness.
Union of India v. Arvind M Kapoor and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the RTI Act prevails over the Anti-Dumping Rules and directed disclosure of the basis of initiation of anti-dumping investigations, subject to justified confidentiality.
Azad @ Gaurav v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity under Section 395 IPC based on witness testimony, recoveries, and CDR evidence, rejecting appellants' challenges on identification and procedural grounds.
Shri Chandra Shekhar Jha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the promotion proposal of petitioners within two months and conduct the Departmental Promotion Committee within three months if eligible, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Alcatel Lucent India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order deleting reassessment additions, holding that reassessment cannot be initiated on information already available on record and requires new material under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Manavi Anusha v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the Look-Out Circular against the petitioner, holding that LOCs must only be issued where the accused evades arrest or trial, and that cooperation with investigation and pending arbitration do not justify its continuation.
MS Ranjita Betarbet v. Subir Banerjee
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC cannot be challenged under Article 227 but only by revision under Section 115 CPC, dismissing the writ petition accordingly.
Bank of Baroda v. Ratul Puri
The Delhi High Court’s quashing of wilful defaulter declarations against directors of Moser Baer was upheld, holding that diversion of borrowed funds must be objectively established with reasoned findings, and unverified forensic audit reports cannot alone justify such declarations.
KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD v. REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked to bypass statutory opposition and rectification remedies under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, emphasizing exhaustion of alternative remedies and judicial restraint.
Manoj Vasudev Pardasany v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular against the petitioner for non-compliance with mandatory periodic review and absence of prosecution sanction, upholding the petitioner’s right to travel abroad.
RBL Bank Ltd. v. The Directorate of Enforcement and Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed RBL Bank to sell mortgaged property despite provisional attachment under PMLA, directing adjudication on money laundering allegations by the Adjudicating Authority.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. National Textiles Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(C) where the assessee made a bona fide error corrected before assessment and lacked mala fide intention or concealment.
Mr Sujit Ghosh, Mr Mannat Waraich and Ms Anshika Agarwal, Advocates. v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST APPEALS II DELHI& ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court held that the GST Appellate Authority cannot deny refund on a new ground not raised earlier without giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Gopi Kishan Saraf and Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a municipal NOC for lift installation in a cooperative housing society, dismissing the petition challenging it and directing separate action against unauthorized constructions.
Apollo Multispeciality Hospital Ltd v. Madan Murari Varma and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the National Commission's order permitting the claimant to reduce the claim amount to fall within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the State Consumer Commission under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
M/S DCM Shriram Ltd. v. M/S Maharaja Salt Works Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator and granted interim injunction maintaining status quo over assets pending arbitration of disputes arising from a salt supply agreement.
Asha Kalra v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the appropriation of sale proceeds first to the bank holding the first charge and then to the second charge holder, allowing 12 weeks to complete payment and ordering release of title deeds upon settlement.
Nagendra Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that failure to qualify the promotional test in the first attempt and medical inability to appear thereafter do not entitle a police officer to seniority protection under Standing Order No. 1/92.
State Bank of India v. The Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court held that the Adjudicating Authority under PMLA must apply its mind before passing attachment orders and directed the petitioner to pursue appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the writ petition.