Delhi High Court

62,488 judgments

Year:

Sanjay Kalra v. State

29 Mar 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:2283
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application seeking Income Tax Returns for proving a Will in probate proceedings, holding such documents irrelevant and the application an abuse of process filed after undue delay.

family petition_dismissed Significant probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will validity Income Tax Returns

Haresh Kumar Choudhary v. State NCT of Delhi

29 Mar 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:2241
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Anticipatory bail was denied to an accused involved in a loan fraud conspiracy due to the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation and evidence recovery.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC cheating criminal conspiracy

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.

29 Mar 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:2265

The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that a credible challenge based on prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunction in patent infringement suits.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent validity prior claiming evergreening interim injunction

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.

29 Mar 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:2271

The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that a credible challenge based on prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunctions in patent infringement suits.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent validity interim injunction prior claiming evergreening

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.

29 Mar 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:2272

The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and a credible challenge raising serious questions of prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunctions in patent infringement suits.

intellectual_property other Significant Patent validity Interim injunction Prior claiming Evergreening

Jauhari Lal & Ors. v. Gurudev Ashram Trust & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:2282

The Delhi High Court appointed an Interim Board of Trustees to manage the Shri Gurudev Ashram Trust and directed them to propose amendments to the Trust Deed to ensure effective administration pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant public charitable trust interim trustees appointment of trustees Trust Deed amendment

Davinder Kumar v. M/S Imaginearc Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

29 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:2410

The Delhi High Court held that execution proceedings should not be delayed on the ground that the statutory appeal period has not expired and directed the Executing Court to proceed expeditiously in line with Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution proceedings statutory period of appeal notice to judgment debtor delay in execution

M/S Gopal Dass Estate and Housing (P) Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council

29 Mar 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:2300
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed premature recovery proceedings and remanded the matter to NDMC to decide the petitioner's rectification application, directing interim payments and de-attachment of bank accounts.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 Section 104 NDMC Act warrant of attachment property tax recovery

M/S Globus Spirits Ltd. v. Wild Berries Bottling Pvt. Ltd.

29 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:2343

The Delhi High Court recorded and decreed a settlement agreement resolving all trademark disputes between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, finally disposing of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC trademark dispute commercial suit

Commissioner of Customs, ACC (Import) v. Anurag Trading Company

29 Mar 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:2403-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that customs duty demands under Section 28B of the Customs Act must be raised within a reasonable period, applying a five-year limitation by analogy, and dismissed the appeal against CESTAT's order setting aside a demand raised after nine years.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28B limitation period customs duty demand

Mr. Sparsh Bhargava, Adv. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST .....

29 Mar 2023 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT M... · 2023:DHC:2440-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a service provider rendering Market Research Services directly to a foreign entity is not an intermediary under IGST Act and is entitled to refund of integrated tax paid on zero-rated supplies.

tax petition_allowed Significant Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 intermediary services zero-rated supply integrated tax refund

Raghbir Singh Chhabra v. Holy Star Natural Resources Ltd & Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:2246

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction protecting the plaintiff's possession under unregistered agreements to sell, dismissed defendants' applications to vacate the injunction due to suppression of facts, and directed maintenance of status quo pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction agreement to sell specific performance Section 53A Transfer of Property Act

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Intex Technologies (India) Limited

29 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:7809

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to modify an interim order on royalty payments already superseded by a Division Bench judgment, holding the defendant liable for contempt for non-payment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant interim order royalty payment patent infringement contempt of court

Poonam Sareen v. MS Unlimited Resources and Ors.

29 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:275

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a delayed execution petition, holding that condonation of delay is not permissible under the Limitation Act for execution petitions under Order XXI CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition condonation of delay Limitation Act 1963 Order XXI CPC

Asha Madan v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

28 Mar 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:2202

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery, holding that mere joint bank account holding does not establish active involvement and no risk of absconding or tampering was shown.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC cheating forgery

Shukla Enterprises Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Circle 22(2) Delhi & Anr.

28 Mar 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:2388-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the income tax reassessment order and notice for non-furnishing of material to the petitioner, directing the Assessing Officer to provide the complete material and opportunity of hearing before proceeding further.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A natural justice

Sahara Medical Store v. Union of India

28 Mar 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:2397-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a three-year blacklisting order against a medical store for supplying expired medicines, holding that imposing multiple penalties for the same allegations violates natural justice and administrative law principles.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting authorized local chemist expired medicines principles of natural justice

M/S Anand Granite Exports Pvt Ltd v. Sanjay Sharma

28 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:2348

Delhi High Court directs Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of pending application under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC after undue delay despite multiple hearings.

civil other Procedural Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC leave to defend summary suit delay in disposal

Manoj Paul v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Anr.

28 Mar 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:2164-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a job offer due to the candidate's suppression of material criminal antecedents, affirming employer discretion to assess suitability despite acquittals.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant suppression of information criminal antecedents appointment cancellation public employment

Kathija Khatoon & Ors v. M/S UFC Projects Pvt Ltd & Ors

28 Mar 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:2206

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation under conventional heads in a motor accident claim, awarding loss of consortium to each claimant and granting compensation for loss of estate and funeral expenses in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of consortium loss of estate funeral expenses