Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Omkar Nath Shukla v. State (GNCTD)
The Delhi High Court directed restoration of electricity connection upon payment of dues without requiring a No Objection Certificate from a third party.
Devendra Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging compulsory retirement on the ground of non-exhaustion of statutory remedy and directed the petitioner to file a revision petition for expeditious decision.
Sushila Devi & Ors. v. Sandeep Kumar (United India Insurance Co. Ltd.)
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying contributory negligence principles, revised income tax returns, and established Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and heads of damages.
Ajay Kumar Sachdev v. Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the National Medical Commission Regulations, 2019 override conflicting institutional eligibility criteria, directing the Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences to consider the petitioner’s application for Professor based on his qualifying research publications.
Sunil Kumar Mourya & Anr. v. Nemo
The Delhi High Court allowed waiver of the six-month statutory waiting period for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, emphasizing consideration of elapsed time and parties' irreconcilable differences.
Dhruv Lamba v. DY Director of Income Tax (Inv) & Anr
The Delhi High Court issued notice and interim relief in a writ petition challenging notices under the Black Money Act, emphasizing the importance of timing and bona fides in proceedings related to undisclosed foreign assets.
Mahesh Dutt Joshi v. Ajay Kumar Saxena
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to amend the written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, 1908, holding that delay in receiving documents via RTI is not attributable to the party and amendments before trial commencement should be liberally permitted.
Gian Deep and Anr. v. Land and Development Office and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed maintenance of status quo on petitioners' properties claimed as forest land pending disposal of their representation treated as an appeal under the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
Transport Corporation of India Ltd v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to compel further answers to interrogatories, holding that the defendant's responses were sufficient under Order XI Rule 11 CPC.
Transport Corporation of India Ltd v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's belated application to file additional documents in a foreign exchange derivative suit for failure to show reasonable cause and abuse of process under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC.
Sanjay Kalra v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application seeking Income Tax Returns for proving a Will in probate proceedings, holding such documents irrelevant and the application an abuse of process filed after undue delay.
Haresh Kumar Choudhary v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to an accused involved in a loan fraud conspiracy due to the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation and evidence recovery.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that a credible challenge based on prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunction in patent infringement suits.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that a credible challenge based on prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunctions in patent infringement suits.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and a credible challenge raising serious questions of prior claiming and evergreening can defeat interim injunctions in patent infringement suits.
Jauhari Lal & Ors. v. Gurudev Ashram Trust & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an Interim Board of Trustees to manage the Shri Gurudev Ashram Trust and directed them to propose amendments to the Trust Deed to ensure effective administration pending final adjudication.
Davinder Kumar v. M/S Imaginearc Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that execution proceedings should not be delayed on the ground that the statutory appeal period has not expired and directed the Executing Court to proceed expeditiously in line with Supreme Court precedent.
M/S Gopal Dass Estate and Housing (P) Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court quashed premature recovery proceedings and remanded the matter to NDMC to decide the petitioner's rectification application, directing interim payments and de-attachment of bank accounts.
M/S Globus Spirits Ltd. v. Wild Berries Bottling Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recorded and decreed a settlement agreement resolving all trademark disputes between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, finally disposing of the suit.
Commissioner of Customs, ACC (Import) v. Anurag Trading Company
The Delhi High Court upheld that customs duty demands under Section 28B of the Customs Act must be raised within a reasonable period, applying a five-year limitation by analogy, and dismissed the appeal against CESTAT's order setting aside a demand raised after nine years.