Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Veolia India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's factual finding that operation and maintenance expenditure, being post-construction, should not be included in contract costs for revenue recognition under the percentage completion method.
Manoj & Anr. v. The State (G.N.C.T of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered under various IPC sections arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
KLE Society's College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed college by NCTE for non-compliance with mandatory infrastructure and faculty qualification norms, emphasizing deference to expert academic authorities.
Union of India v. MPB Construction Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that delay beyond three months plus thirty days under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
CHIEF SECRETARY GNCTD v. INDER KUMAR GROUP C POST
The Delhi High Court held that Recruitment Rules excluding Mathematics as an essential qualification for Pharmacist posts are ultra vires Pharmacy Council regulations, affirming respondents' entitlement to reinstatement and benefits.
Fleur Hotels Private Limited v. M/S Hind Inns and Hotels Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a hotel lease agreement, confirming the arbitrability of the dispute and procedural compliance.
M/S ENERGY EFFICIENT SERVICES LIMITED v. M/S MERRY GOLD ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes after the respondent failed to appear despite proper service.
Sona Mandhira Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining use of the mark 'SONA' despite a disclaimer and suppression of facts, emphasizing judicial discretion and protection of dominant trademark features.
Kirti College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court quashed the premature invocation of Section 17 of the NCTE Act without prior notice and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's application for shifting its institution in accordance with earlier court directions.
Shafiqur Rahman Kidwai Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees appointed as casual labourers before 01.01.2004 are entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme with 50% of their casual service counted, and are not governed by the National Pension System introduced for new recruits from 01.01.2004.
Lokesh Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of simultaneous punishments imposed on the petitioner in light of Supreme Court precedent, disposing of the writ petition with directions for a reasoned decision.
Kailash Kaur v. Harvinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed the order transferring a residential property suit from the civil court to the Commercial Court, pending further hearing on jurisdictional and procedural issues under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
CARS24 Services Private Limited v. Ranjeet Singh Jindal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a mutually agreed sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate lease deed disputes, condoning delay and directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Vikas Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of an alternative plot allotment application due to non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria and inordinate delay of about 20 years, affirming the doctrine of delay and laches barring stale claims.
M/S INCAS v. INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a recovery notice issued for damages under the PP Act, holding that the order imposing damages had attained finality and the writ was not maintainable against execution proceedings.
Curling Association of India v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Olympic Association to decide which body should be recognized as the National Sports Federation for Curling in India after hearing both parties and considering all relevant documents.
Ram Dhan Panchal and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the Cadre Review proposal for Tradesman Cadre within a fixed timeframe and forward it for Ministry approval, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Kiran Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the relief sought under the BSF Act and Rules had already been granted by the respondents.
Dhruv Jalan v. Arun Malhotra
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to recall the complainant for cross-examination subject to conditions including payment of costs and restrictions on adjournments to prevent trial delay.
Gannon Dunkerley and Company Ltd. v. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees cannot be restrained from invocation on contractual disputes alone and allowed NHIDC to encash the guarantees subject to adjustment after valuation of unpaid works.