Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Irfan Khan v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR under the Arms Act, holding that possession of a prohibited knife without satisfactory explanation justifies continuation of criminal proceedings.
Jitender Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that charges under Section 509 IPC and Section 12 POCSO Act relating to a separate prior incident cannot be joined with offences in a later FIR lacking temporal and transactional connection, and set aside the framing of such charges.
Razia Begum v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, holding that specific allegations disclose a prima facie case and the matter must proceed to trial.
Neelmani Singh v. Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation and allegations of forgery of a Will raise triable issues, thus the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC at the threshold.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Santosh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Louis Vuitton against defendants manufacturing and selling counterfeit goods bearing its well-known trademarks, proceeding ex parte due to defendants' non-appearance.
Mohini Electricals Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court set aside the Delhi Jal Board's debarment of Mohini Electricals Limited for failure to issue a prior show cause notice and applied COVID-19 related MSME relief measures.
Nanu Ram Goyal v. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inordinate delay of over thirteen years in adjudicating a service tax show cause notice, without justified cause and without informing the petitioner of procedural abeyance, renders the proceedings impermissible and liable to be quashed.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Arvind Kumar Trading and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Mankind Pharma's petition to cancel the confusingly similar "NIKIND" trademark registered by the respondent for non-use and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's well-known "KIND" family of marks.
Colvyn James Harris v. Flexing IT Services Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for conversion of CCDs, holding that concealment of material facts disentitles the petitioner and that the dispute is to be resolved by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO (IS-I) (IS-IV Desk) Ministry of Home Affairs
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of sensitive intelligence information related to the banning of Indian Mujahideen under the RTI Act, dismissing the petition filed by a death row convict seeking such information.
Gopal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF authorities to decide the petitioners' pending representations seeking pay and career progression benefits within a fixed time, without adjudicating on the merits.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. M/S Maverick Mobile Solution
The Delhi High Court dismissed BSNL's petition to set aside an arbitral award, holding that the award was well-reasoned, within jurisdiction, and not in violation of public policy or fundamental law.
Rohit Panjwani v. M/S BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioner voluntarily resigned and dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of his claim of forced resignation.
Satish Kumar Linda v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and stayed the transfer order pending such decision.
The Boeing Company & Anr. v. Advance Technologies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to The Boeing Company against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit due to defendants' non-appearance.
Aeronutrix Sports Products Pvt Ltd v. Plumax Ebusiness Solutions Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by recording a lawful settlement agreement wherein the defendants acknowledged the plaintiff's rights, withdrew oppositions, agreed to damages, and undertook not to infringe in future.
Union of India & Ors. v. HFO Shashi Kant Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension arising during service, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related absent contrary medical evidence.
Sachin v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted age relaxation to the petitioner for the period of non-selection and additional years, directing respondents to follow the precedent set in a similar earlier case.
Md Aasif & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine voluntary settlement between estranged spouses resolving all matrimonial disputes.
IPSAA HOLDINGS PVT LTD v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSINER, EPFO
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an appeal under the Employees’ Provident Funds Act for non-deposit of amount within time, holding that readiness to deposit on the date of hearing despite administrative delay warrants adjudication on merits.