Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Ganesh Sawant v. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that notice is mandatory under Section 110(1D) of the Customs Act before concluding proceedings affecting seized gold, affirming natural justice principles, but dismissed the petition as the seized gold was already disposed of.
Divya Mehrotra v. Jyoti Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed delayed filing of the written statement in a civil suit subject to payment of costs, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities.
Amit Jain v. Canara Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the imposition of Rs. 1 lakh costs on the appellant after finding that the advance copy of notice was duly served on the respondent bank.
Prakash Chand v. Sh Ram Narain Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the suit was maintainable in the original court despite territorial changes and was not barred under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act as the rent exceeded Rs. 3,500.
Bijender Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a genuine mutual settlement and divorce by consent.
Arvind Medicare Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the refusal of registration of the trademark "MIRACLES" under class 44, holding that acquired distinctiveness through long use overcomes objections under Sections 9(1) and 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
R N Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s original five-year term under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is protected by the proviso to Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and cannot be curtailed by the new four-year term, allowing the petitioner to complete his first tenure before commencing re-appointment.
Master Medhansh Jhawar @ Madhav v. Rajesh Bhushan & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs prompt release of funds and approves a larger Rare Diseases Committee at AIIMS to ensure timely treatment of children with rare diseases, emphasizing State accountability and efficient administrative action.
Tulsi v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 Delhi v. Alchemist Capital Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against deletion of additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act for AY 2010-2011 due to lack of incriminating material and no substantial question of law arising.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi v. Oriental Tollways Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against deletion of Section 14A disallowance where no exempt income was earned, affirming binding precedents and allowing condonation of delay.
Ashok Tiwari v. Canara Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging SARFAESI proceedings, holding that disputed factual questions on debt conversion and availability of alternative remedies preclude interference under Article 226.
Faimuddin & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute due to an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Peter Beck und Partner Vermogensverwaltung GmbH v. Prakash Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of execution of a foreign commercial judgment under Section 44A CPC, deleted a non-liable demerged entity from proceedings, and clarified the independent jurisdictional scheme for foreign decree enforcement in India.
Sanjay Bansal & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, and 34 IPC based on a settlement between parties and the bleak prospects of conviction, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Mohammad Imran Khan and Ors v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit street vendors to vend peacefully within their designated zones in compliance with their vending certificates, while leaving administrative issues regarding certificate terms to appropriate authorities.
Vijay Gupta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend peacefully at the designated site in strict compliance with the terms of his certificate of vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Dr. Vanit Nalwa & Anr. v. Sh. P Krishnamurthy & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging violation of a status quo order by the Delhi Jal Board, holding that temporary installation of a public hydrant and repair work outside the disputed land did not constitute contempt.
Biju Nanda Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation against recovery of risk and hardship allowance and decide it expeditiously, staying recovery meanwhile.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Lalit Modi
The Delhi High Court convicted Lalit Modi for contempt of court for willful disobedience of orders to deposit monies, sentencing him to four months' simple imprisonment and a fine, with the sentence kept in abeyance for twelve weeks.