Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

CEAT LIMITED v. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND ORS

03 May 2023 · Najmi Waziri; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:3512-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a bank must prove outstanding dues with proper documents and cannot fasten liability on a successor company without such proof, setting aside the recovery decree against CEAT Limited.

civil appeal_allowed Significant burden of proof successor liability merger debt recovery

Sukhdev Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

03 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3036

The Delhi High Court held that while no foul play was found in the death of a COVID-19 patient who escaped to a hospital roof, the hospital's failure to guard access and maintain CCTV surveillance constituted negligence warranting compensation and safety guidelines.

administrative petition_allowed Significant hospital negligence duty of care COVID-19 isolation ward patient safety

0ae7774b8cd1fdff5de7c09fa26f1cfac51d0cb2d9d13f53dc9f5c0948b2d52d

03 May 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:3121
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed petition seeking relaxation of JEE (Advanced) 2023 eligibility criteria, affirming expert academic bodies' policy decisions and limiting judicial interference.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant JEE Advanced eligibility Covid-19 pandemic relaxation Academic policy judicial review Criterion 3 and 4 JEE Advanced

Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Sub Lavhate Suresh Akaram

03 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service absent contrary proof by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Rajan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3715

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354D IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process when the complainant does not intend to support prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 354D IPC Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR inherent powers of High Court

Suresh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

02 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3708

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

Alok Malhotra v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

02 May 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:3047

The Delhi High Court held that an administrative order rejecting a pay anomaly claim must be reasoned and speaking, directing the ICAI to reconsider the petitioner's representations accordingly.

administrative other Significant pay anomaly Accelerated Promotion Scheme reasoned order speaking order

BRINDCO SALES PVT LTD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

02 May 2023 · TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2023:DHC:3003

Delhi High Court held that leftover liquor stock including unregistered brands must be disposed under Rule 56 of Delhi Excise Rules, and excess excise duty paid under old regime must be refunded or adjusted.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Excise Rules 2010 Rule 56 leftover stock Rule 63 approved brands Excise duty refund

Preetendra Singh Aulakh v. Green Light Foods Pvt. Ltd.

02 May 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:2949

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of 'MONSOON HARVEST' mark, holding the marks deceptively similar and goods allied, rejecting estoppel and prior user defenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off deceptive similarity prior user

Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. Scaria and Mr. Apoorv Srivastava, Advocates v. THE STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ORS

02 May 2023 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL · 2023:DHC:2967

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regular parole to file a Special Leave Petition, holding that parole is discretionary and must consider the convict’s conduct, threat to witnesses, and availability of custody parole.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant parole Special Leave Petition custody parole conviction

Nagmani Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

02 May 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:3099-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits as the issue was already decided by a government Office Memorandum and prior court judgment.

administrative petition_dismissed Old Pension Scheme Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 General Provident Fund Account Office Memorandum

Jai Prakash @ Montu & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

02 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4667

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Sections 323/324/34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR settlement Section 323 IPC

Prakash v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3025

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged assault causing injuries, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with the investigation and non-tampering with evidence.

criminal bail_granted anticipatory bail Section 308 IPC Section 341 IPC Section 34 IPC

Premium Estates Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 19(1) Delhi & Anr.

02 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:3232-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the order and notice under Sections 148A(d) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to procedural lapses including delayed notice and lack of real-time alert, directing the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh with a personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148A Section 148 Notice under Section 148A(b)

Bank of Baroda v. Naseem Ahmed

02 May 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:2996

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award directing automatic absorption of a temporary peon beyond the terms of reference, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions and settlement conditions.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25 Section 25-F Section 25-G

Bimla Chopra & Anr. v. Kuldeep

02 May 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:2997
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal in a possession suit, holding that the plaintiff with a better title than a licensee is entitled to possession despite absence of registered sale deed, applying Section 116 Indian Evidence Act and clarifying res judicata does not bar civil title suits following eviction proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession suit better title licensee Section 116 Indian Evidence Act

Rajendra Kashyap & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

02 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3017

Delhi High Court quashed Look-Out Circulars against petitioners for loan defaults, holding LOCs valid only in cognizable offences and requiring periodic review by originating agencies.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look-Out Circular LOC guidelines wilful defaulter Office Memorandum 2010

Amitesh Grover v. National School of Drama

02 May 2023 · Najmi Waziri; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:3074-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that absence of performance sheets or recorded reasons does not invalidate a selection process unless mandated by law, and upheld the appointment of Amitesh Grover as Assistant Professor at NSD.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Selection Committee Performance Sheet Transparency Articles 14 and 16

Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

02 May 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:3100-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits as the issue was already settled by a government office memorandum and prior judicial ruling.

administrative petition_dismissed Old Pension Scheme CCS Pension Rules 1972 General Provident Fund office memorandum

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar

02 May 2023 · Rekha Palli · 2023:DHC:3002

The Delhi High Court held that continuity of service granted under a settlement must be counted for gratuity computation despite waiver of back wages, dismissing the employer's petition challenging gratuity payment for the intervening period.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act continuity of service gratuity computation settlement agreement