Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Subedar Dinesh Nair T v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a 'severe reprimand' punishment due to inordinate delay and laches in filing the statutory complaint under the Army Act.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Hari Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded to the deceased driver's parents under the Employees Compensation Act, emphasizing the limited scope of appeal under Section 30 to substantial questions of law only.
Walltracts India Pvt Ltd v. Somfy India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC is not maintainable against an order passed under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC, as Order 37 CPC is a complete code governing summary suits and setting aside ex-parte decrees.
Uttar Pradesh Kho Kho Federation v. Kho Kho Federation of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Kho Kho Federation of India to grant affiliation to the Uttar Pradesh Kho Kho Association within two weeks following court-supervised elections and prior judicial orders, emphasizing compliance with federation rules and judicial directions.
Om Prakash v. Commissioner of Police and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a compassionate appointment application on grounds of overage and adequate financial benefits to the family, affirming that such appointments are discretionary and subject to strict eligibility criteria.
Randhir Singh v. Urvashi Suri
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement due to the petitioner's medical condition, setting aside the Trial Court's order and imposing compensatory costs.
M/S S. S. Hospitality v. M/S Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that franchisees are not subordinate offices for territorial jurisdiction under the Trade Marks Act, and upheld the suit's maintainability in Delhi.
Anil Kumar Vohra v. MCD
The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's tender eligibility criteria restricting participation to contractors with specialized experience in concrete road construction, dismissing the petition alleging arbitrariness and violation of Article 14.
Manoj Kumar v. Land and Building Department and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-substitution of legal representatives after the petitioner's death but granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the rejection of an alternative land allotment application.
Ankit Ahuja & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce decree.
Himanshu Chauhan v. Shikha
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Seema Anil Kapoor v. C.L. Bhalla Dayanand Model School
Delhi High Court directs payment of salary arrears under 6th and 7th CPC to school employees, resolving calculation disputes through Directorate of Education intervention.
Savita Tokas v. State (NCT) of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner involved in a government job fraud case involving impersonation and forgery, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and thorough investigation.
Jagtar Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a corrigendum tender and upheld the validity of a fresh tender for a parking site, emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender matters absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
Puran Chand v. Delhi Fire Service & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to prevent illegal encroachments by eateries in a residential area, enforce fire safety norms, and impose fines to protect public space and safety.
Jaquar Company Pvt Ltd v. Villeroy Boch AG & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining Villeroy from using the deceptively similar trademark "ARTIS" infringing Jaquar's registered mark "ARTIZE" under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
The Commissioner of Income Tax – International Taxation -1 v. Amadeus IT Group SA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the Tribunal's order on profit attribution, income classification, and interest under Section 234B, holding that tax deducted at source negates advance tax liability and interest under Section 234B.
Rakbro Industrial Corporation & Anr. v. Suraj Auto Stores & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of objections in execution proceedings, holding that allegations of forgery and lack of privity not raised earlier cannot be entertained under Section 47 CPC.
The Commissioner of Income Tax – International Taxation -1 v. Amadeus IT Group SA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals on income tax issues relating to profit attribution, booking fees, and interest liability, holding the questions were covered by binding Supreme Court precedents.
Pratap Singh and Others v. The State and Others & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a private dispute between neighbors following their voluntary settlement under Section 482 CrPC.