Delhi High Court
29,726 judgments
Yusuf Khan v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to conduct the mandatory survey of street vendors in the NDMC area and consider the petitioner’s case in accordance with the Street Vendors Act, 2014, dismissing the petition without granting interim relief.
Nitin Arora & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by strict limitation under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the limitation period and limited scope of judicial interference.
Faeem & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Satish Garg v. Shikha Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to restrain a financer from taking possession of a secured matrimonial property but granted interim humanitarian relief to the respondent pending final adjudication.
Aayub v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's charge framing order under Section 307 IPC for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Raj Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the multiplier for a government servant claimant to account for pension benefits, while upholding the interest rate awarded.
Surajinder Singh v. Pinki
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's order closing the petitioner's right to cross-examine the respondent, balancing diligence and inconvenience, and directed payment of costs.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Balvinder Kaur Nijjar
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving real estate development delays caused by ASI intervention, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving delay and termination of a real estate allotment agreement, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the award was not perverse or patently illegal.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, emphasizing strict adherence to the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including the limited scope for condonation of delay even considering COVID-19 extensions.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes under its inherent powers, holding that amicable settlement and bleak chances of conviction justify ending criminal proceedings even for serious offences.
Ms Manibala v. State Govt. of N.C.T & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a petty dispute between parties who amicably settled, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent unnecessary criminal prosecution.
CCTEB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 17 AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the income tax demand pending appeal and restrained coercive action until the appeal is decided on merits.
Anchit Mathur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual employee was given a reasonable opportunity to be heard through a notice and reply process, and a reasoned final order of termination complied with natural justice and Article 14, dismissing the petition challenging the termination notice.
Ashwa Ghosh v. Vizrt AG
An appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is not maintainable against decisions of the WIPO administrative panel as it is not an order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks.
Pradeep @ Prince v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's bail plea in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, holding that strong prima facie evidence and the gravity of the offence preclude bail despite parity with co-accused.
P Kanagasabhavathy v. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the DRAT order holding the petitioner liable to reimburse the auction purchaser after setting aside the auction sale due to petitioner’s belated and insubstantial objections, clarifying the applicability of Rule 61 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.