Delhi High Court
63,783 judgments
Chandra Mohan Khandelwal v. The State & Ors.
Anticipatory bail granted to accused in molestation case after charge sheet filing, subject to conditions ensuring investigation integrity.
Ravi Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition quashing the medical board’s declaration of unfitness for overweight, holding that the petitioner’s weight fell within permissible limits under the Recruitment Medical Examination Guidelines allowing +/- 5 kg relaxation in borderline cases.
Anoop Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' genuine settlement and mutual consent divorce, preserving the child's rights.
Monika Gupta v. Sanjay Bansal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 1969-day delay, holding that delay caused by lack of diligence in pursuing a review petition cannot be excused.
Yusuf Khan v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to conduct the mandatory survey of street vendors in the NDMC area and consider the petitioner’s case in accordance with the Street Vendors Act, 2014, dismissing the petition without granting interim relief.
Nitin Arora & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by strict limitation under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the limitation period and limited scope of judicial interference.
Faeem & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Satish Garg v. Shikha Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to restrain a financer from taking possession of a secured matrimonial property but granted interim humanitarian relief to the respondent pending final adjudication.
Aayub v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's charge framing order under Section 307 IPC for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Raj Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the multiplier for a government servant claimant to account for pension benefits, while upholding the interest rate awarded.
Surajinder Singh v. Pinki
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's order closing the petitioner's right to cross-examine the respondent, balancing diligence and inconvenience, and directed payment of costs.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Balvinder Kaur Nijjar
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving real estate development delays caused by ASI intervention, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Jaswinder Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the petitioner failed to establish grounds for setting aside the award.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving delay and termination of a real estate allotment agreement, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the award was not perverse or patently illegal.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, emphasizing strict adherence to the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including the limited scope for condonation of delay even considering COVID-19 extensions.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes under its inherent powers, holding that amicable settlement and bleak chances of conviction justify ending criminal proceedings even for serious offences.
Ms Manibala v. State Govt. of N.C.T & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a petty dispute between parties who amicably settled, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent unnecessary criminal prosecution.
CCTEB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 17 AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the income tax demand pending appeal and restrained coercive action until the appeal is decided on merits.