Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Surajinder Singh v. Pinki
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's order closing the petitioner's right to cross-examine the respondent, balancing diligence and inconvenience, and directed payment of costs.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Balvinder Kaur Nijjar
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving real estate development delays caused by ASI intervention, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Jaswinder Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the petitioner failed to establish grounds for setting aside the award.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration dispute involving delay and termination of a real estate allotment agreement, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award in an international commercial arbitration, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the award was not perverse or patently illegal.
Omaxe Ltd. v. Joginder Singh Nijjar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, emphasizing strict adherence to the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including the limited scope for condonation of delay even considering COVID-19 extensions.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes under its inherent powers, holding that amicable settlement and bleak chances of conviction justify ending criminal proceedings even for serious offences.
Ms Manibala v. State Govt. of N.C.T & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a petty dispute between parties who amicably settled, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent unnecessary criminal prosecution.
CCTEB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 17 AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the income tax demand pending appeal and restrained coercive action until the appeal is decided on merits.
Anchit Mathur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual employee was given a reasonable opportunity to be heard through a notice and reply process, and a reasoned final order of termination complied with natural justice and Article 14, dismissing the petition challenging the termination notice.
Ashwa Ghosh v. Vizrt AG
An appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is not maintainable against decisions of the WIPO administrative panel as it is not an order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks.
Pradeep @ Prince v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's bail plea in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, holding that strong prima facie evidence and the gravity of the offence preclude bail despite parity with co-accused.
P Kanagasabhavathy v. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the DRAT order holding the petitioner liable to reimburse the auction purchaser after setting aside the auction sale due to petitioner’s belated and insubstantial objections, clarifying the applicability of Rule 61 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Suman Chadha v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court held that the twin-conditions for bail under section 212(6) of the Companies Act apply only after arrest and incarceration, and granted regular bail to the accused who appeared on summons without prior arrest.
Union of India v. M/S Batra Brothers
The Delhi High Court held that Supreme Court orders passed under Article 142 are not binding precedents and set aside lower orders applying such an order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication under the Public Premises Act.
Union of India v. M/S J&S Construction
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 and upholding the arbitrator's jurisdiction and findings on excepted matters and claims.
Ashraf v. State
The Delhi High Court held that the charge under Section 412 IPC was unsustainable against the petitioner scrap dealer and directed framing of charge under Section 411 IPC instead, emphasizing the necessity of knowledge of dacoity for Section 412.
Sandeep Dahiya @ Baaja v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious abduction case after considering the nature of offences, non-support of prosecution witnesses, prolonged custody, and absence of prior convictions.
Amit Gupta v. Akil Ahmed & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to include 40% of income as compensation for loss of future prospects in a permanent disability motor accident claim, remanding the matter for re-determination.
Chegg India Pvt Limited v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi East & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the refund rejection and appellate orders for failure to issue mandatory notice under CGST Rules, directing fresh consideration of the petitioner's Input Tax Credit refund claims on Zero Rated Supplies.