Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

Anil Gupta @ Ram Kishore v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

26 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5404

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Shreejikrupa Project Limited v. Telecommunication Consultants India Limited & Ors.

26 Jul 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:5186-DB

Delhi High Court upheld the tendering authority's decision to declare Respondent No.2 techno-commercially qualified based on a valid green building certificate, dismissing the petition challenging the contract award for lack of mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender evaluation techno-commercial qualification GRIHA certificate judicial review

Jindal Exports and Imports Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi

26 Jul 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia

Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and orders issued beyond prescribed timelines and without mandatory officer details, emphasizing strict procedural compliance under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148A(b) Income Tax Act Section 148A(d) Income Tax Act CBDT Instruction No. 1/2022 reassessment notices

Syngenta Limited v. Controller of Patents and Designs

26 Jul 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:5225
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the requirement of plurality of inventions in the parent application applies only when a divisional application is filed to remedy an objection, not when filed suo moto, and that plurality may be disclosed in specifications beyond claims, referring key questions to a Division Bench.

intellectual_property other Significant Divisional Application Patents Act, 1970 Section 16 Plurality of Inventions

Sub Maj Narinder Kumar v. Union of India

26 Jul 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:182-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to cancel a transfer order of an army personnel nearing retirement to ensure timely completion of pension formalities and course attendance.

administrative petition_allowed transfer order service personnel retirement pension documentation

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Network Programme India Ltd.

25 Jul 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:5347-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated merely on audit objections or change of opinion without tangible material, quashing the reassessment in respect of capital work-in-progress write-off.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant reassessment Section 147 Section 148 Income Tax Act, 1961

Vijay Pal Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

25 Jul 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:5125
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of forgery charges against the respondent, affirming that forgery requires the accused to be the maker of a false document and that procedural safeguards were complied with during charge alteration.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant framing of charge forgery Section 467 IPC Section 468 IPC

Sunil Kumar Agarwal v. Air Force School and Anr

25 Jul 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2005 SCC OnLine Del 778
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Dismissal of a private school employee without prior approval of the Directorate of Education under Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 is illegal, warranting compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

labor petition_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 8(2) prior approval dismissal

Pure Diets India Limited v. Lokmangal Agro Industries Ltd.

25 Jul 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:5138

The Delhi High Court held that Clause 15.[7] of the Supply Agreement did not constitute a valid arbitration agreement, dismissing the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act exclusive jurisdiction clause consensus ad idem

Rihan @ Noor Mohammad v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr

25 Jul 2023 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:5271

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 376/506 IPC and POCSO Act in a rare case where the complainant and accused married, settled disputes, and have minor children, emphasizing the welfare of children and interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC consensual relationship compromise deed

Manish Jain v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

25 Jul 2023 · Manmohan; Mini Pushkarna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of the petitioner’s bank accounts as fraud for failure to provide an opportunity of hearing, affirming that natural justice must be observed before such classification under RBI Master Directions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant audi alteram partem Master Direction on Fraud Reserve Bank of India classification of fraud

Cairnhill CGPE Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2, New Delhi

25 Jul 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:5336-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging an order under Section 163 of the Income Tax Act after the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the impugned order, holding that such petitions are not maintainable post-tribunal order.

tax petition_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 163 Section 263 representative assessee

Sumiran Kumar v. Union of India and Others

25 Jul 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:5137-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order, directing the petitioner to join the posting and submit a representation to be considered as per official guidelines.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order interim relief Central Administrative Tribunal representation against transfer

Prince Nagar v. The State

25 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5154

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a young accused in a case involving casteist abuse and assault, emphasizing bail principles and imposing strict conditions to protect witnesses and ensure trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed bail casteist remarks POCSO Act SC/ST Act

Naveen Kumar Sharma v. Asst. Commissioner Food and Civil Supply and Ors.

25 Jul 2023 · Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:5199

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking CBI investigation and revocation of a fair price shop license, holding that criminal remedies under CrPC must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition registration of FIR Section 156(3) CrPC investigation

Jindal Steel and Power Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:5231-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the e-auction results for a coal mine, holding that no credible technical glitch was proven and refusing to reopen the concluded auction process.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant e-auction technical glitch coal mine auction public interest

Suresh Mehto v. Lakhvinder Singh & Ors.

25 Jul 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5232

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident appeal by setting aside contributory negligence attributed to the claimant and directed enhanced compensation including future prospects for permanent disability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence head-on collision compensation

Vikas Singh v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr.

25 Jul 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:5204-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the medical rejection of a candidate for ITBP service, holding that the Medical Board’s findings of congenital anomalies rendering him unfit were valid and binding.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness armed forces recruitment congenital anomaly Dextrocardia

Sheena v. Chirag Nath

25 Jul 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5278

The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court’s order allowing amendment of the respondent’s written statement after trial commencement for lack of due diligence, emphasizing strict compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC to prevent trial delays.

family petition_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence trial commencement

M/S SHIVBHOLA FILAMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST & ANR.

25 Jul 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:5217-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity to be heard and directed reconsideration after proper reconciliation and hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST refund input tax credit inverted tax structure Form GSTR 2A