Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

CITICORP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. SHIV-VANI OIL & GAS EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD

25 Jul 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:5206

The Delhi High Court transferred the winding up petition of Shiv-Vani Oil & Gas Exploration Services Ltd. to the NCLT, directing release of verified third-party properties post disposal of company assets and reimbursement of security expenses by secured creditors.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant winding up transfer to NCLT Companies Act 1956 Section 434

Lhingneihat Lhouvum v. IO, Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr.

25 Jul 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:5135
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a commercial heroin trafficking case under the NDPS Act, holding that the prima facie material did not satisfy the stringent conditions of Section 37 for denial of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS controlled delivery

Piyush Gopal Bandhopadhyay v. State (EOW)

25 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5247

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to a senior IFS officer accused of cheating and forgery after prolonged custody and completion of investigation, subject to conditions.

criminal bail_granted interim bail Section 439 CrPC Section 482 CrPC cheating

Ashok Malhotra and Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

25 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5427

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a family property dispute following an amicable mediated settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR mediation settlement family dispute

M/S ADYA INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED v. PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD & ANR.

25 Jul 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:5218-DB

Delhi High Court held that the stay order of Bombay High Court did not affect the jurisdictional transfer of recovery proceedings and directed the Recovery Officer to decide the petitioner's application expeditiously.

civil other Significant Debts Recovery Tribunal Recovery Officer jurisdiction property attachment

Bhagat Singh & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.)

25 Jul 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5371
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 406, 420, 120B, and 34 IPC, holding that the investigation should proceed as the allegations disclose cognizable offences and quashing at this stage is premature.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Article 226 Constitution cognizable offence

Hari Ram Tiwari v. New Delhi Municipal Council

25 Jul 2023 · Manmohan; Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:5272-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of a government employee after holding that the domestic inquiry was conducted fairly and in accordance with natural justice principles.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant domestic inquiry principles of natural justice compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings

Darshan Singh v. Chairman Cum Managing Director, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5765
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that pay fixation benefits for notional promotion are payable only from the date of actual joining, not from the date of notional promotion, and refused to direct promotion or investigation without sufficient grounds.

labor petition_dismissed Significant notional promotion no work no pay pay fixation benefits retrospective promotion

Vanya Jain v. Ambit Finvest Pvt Ltd

24 Jul 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:5265

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act is premature and must await action under Section 13(4) before statutory remedies under Section 17 can be invoked.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Section 13(3A) Section 13(4)

PayPal Payments Private Limited v. Financial Intelligence Unit India & Anr.

24 Jul 2023 · Yashwant Varma · 2023:DHC:5059

The Delhi High Court held that PayPal qualifies as a payment system operator and reporting entity under the PMLA, mandating compliance with anti-money laundering obligations despite non-registration under the PSS Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Payment system operator Prevention of Money Laundering Act Reporting entity Financial Intelligence Unit India

TTK Prestige Ltd. v. Gupta Light House

24 Jul 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 3750
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the plaintiff's registered cooker design, found defendant's products infringing during registration term, denied injunction post-expiry, and granted rendition of accounts for damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Design infringement Designs Act, 2000 Design piracy Novelty and originality

Satyam Yadav v. Union of India and Anr

24 Jul 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:5205-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-examination in the CRPF Physical Efficiency Test due to the petitioner’s failure to notify medical incapacity on the test day and held that belated claims do not warrant relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Physical Efficiency Test Physical Standard Test CRPF recruitment menstruation

Dinesh Chand Tiwari v. State The Chief Secretary & Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5408

The High Court set aside an interim maintenance order for lack of reasoning and remanded the matter for fresh income assessment and maintenance determination.

family appeal_allowed interim maintenance income assessment family court revision petition

State v. Rahul

24 Jul 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:5208

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal, affirming that simple head injuries without intention or knowledge to cause death do not attract section 308 IPC but fall under section 323 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 308 IPC Culpable homicide not amounting to murder Intention or knowledge Simple injury

Prashant Sharma v. The State & Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5291

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC based on a bona fide compromise between parties and exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise in criminal case rash and negligent driving

Ajay Kumar Pandey v. New Delhi Municipal Council

24 Jul 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:5109-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of a wage claim for a period during which the petitioner was not on muster roll or performing duty, affirming the principle of 'no work no pay' despite retrospective regularization.

labor petition_dismissed no work no pay retrospective regularization wages claim Central Administrative Tribunal

Asha @ Pasho @ Bazi v. State of NCT Delhi

24 Jul 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:5243

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity heroin case, holding that the strict embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies and procedural lapses do not justify bail without reasonable grounds to believe innocence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity bail under NDPS Act Section 52-A NDPS Act

Satya Veer Singh v. Sahid & Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5298

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a second motor accident claim petition as not maintainable but granted liberty to revive the earlier dismissed claim petition, emphasizing the beneficial nature of the Motor Vehicles Act and relaxing procedural technicalities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal claim petition dismissal in default recall of dismissal

Sanjeev Chanana v. M/S. Telestra Trade Place Pvt. Ltd.

24 Jul 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:5210

The High Court held that the trial court must exercise its plenary power under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to summon or recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for justice, and set aside the dismissal of such an application filed after delay without justification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. summoning witnesses discretionary power discovery of truth

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Sh. Nanhakuoo and Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5121

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer’s appeal, holding that a valid driving license authorizing the driver to operate the offending vehicle precludes exemption of insurer’s liability under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

motor_accident_claims / civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 149 Driving license validity Insurance liability