Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

State v. Amit Kumar & Anr.

09 Aug 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:5922-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal challenging the acquittal of two accused in a gang rape case, holding that Section 34 IPC cannot be invoked without challenging their acquittal under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed gang rape Section 376 IPC Section 34 IPC acquittal

State v. Dheeraj Sharma & Ors.

09 Aug 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:5887-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death and murder case due to lack of conclusive evidence proving dowry harassment or homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 302 IPC

CCS Computers Pvt. Ltd. v. Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd.

09 Aug 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5631

The Delhi High Court set aside a two-year ban imposed on a contractor for invoking MSMED Act remedies, holding such punitive action without reasoned justification is arbitrary and unsustainable.

civil petition_allowed Significant blacklisting ban MSMED Act back-to-back payment

Cherry Bahl v. The Cooperative Store Ltd.

09 Aug 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:5580-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking re-initiation of a closed auction process for cooperative society shops, affirming the finality of the Supreme Court's eviction order and rejecting claims without legal title.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bidding process auction possession Official Liquidator

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Subhash & Ors.

09 Aug 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5731

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, setting aside the compensation awarded for rash and negligent driving due to lack of proof, and directed claimants to seek compensation under hit-and-run provisions.

motor_accidents_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 rash and negligent driving hit-and-run accident

Akebia Therapeutics Inc. v. Controller General of Patents, Design, Trademark and Geographical Indications

09 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:5672

The Delhi High Court held that documents filed without affidavits do not constitute evidence in post-grant patent opposition proceedings, quashed the Opposition Board’s recommendations due to procedural irregularities, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with directions for strict compliance with the Patents Rules.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant post-grant opposition Patents Act 1970 Patents Rules 2003 Rule 57 evidence

Darpan Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

09 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:5770-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a penalty notice under Section 271F of the Income Tax Act as it was based on an assessment order that had already been quashed by the court.

tax petition_allowed Section 271F Income Tax Act penalty notice assessment order set aside Income Tax penalty

Parvin Juneja v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

09 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5664

The Delhi High Court allowed an accused's petition to travel abroad for his son's university admission, balancing personal liberty with trial attendance and imposing conditions to ensure compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC permission to travel abroad personal liberty parental rights

Ram Niwas Dhanda v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Aug 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:5684-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the same BSF disciplinary order for the second time, holding that principles of res judicata and issue estoppel bar a fresh petition merely due to change of counsel.

administrative petition_dismissed res judicata constructive res judicata issue estoppel writ petition

Resilient Innovations Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr

09 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Trade Marks to decide the petitioner's request for abandonment of opposition under Rule 45(2) of the Trade Mark Rules, 2017 within four weeks, ensuring a personal hearing and adherence to natural justice.

intellectual_property other Trade Mark Rules, 2017 Rule 45(2) Opposition abandonment Registrar of Trade Marks

Anurag Goel v. Chhavi Agarwal

09 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5597

The Delhi High Court held that a party who wilfully breaches a court-bound settlement agreement and affidavit of undertaking in matrimonial proceedings is liable for contempt of court, affirming the binding nature of such undertakings despite refusal to consent to divorce.

family conviction_upheld Significant settlement agreement affidavit of undertaking contempt of court Hindu Marriage Act 1955

Kusum Lata Singhal v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.

09 Aug 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:5595
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld SEBI circulars and BSE's order debarring a former director of a non-compliant exclusively listed company, affirming the validity of regulatory exit mechanisms and procedural fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant SEBI circulars Exclusively Listed Companies Delisting Guidelines Natural Justice

Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. Border Security Force

09 Aug 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:5680-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Competent Authority under the Border Security Force Act to decide the petitioner’s pending statutory appeal within six weeks, ensuring timely adjudication.

administrative petition_allowed Border Security Force Act Section 117(2) statutory appeal General Security Force Court

Nabal Thakur v. The State

09 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5596

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in a serious sexual assault case involving a minor, underscored medical negligence in pregnancy termination, and issued directions to safeguard evidence and improve medical procedures.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail sexual assault minor victim medical termination of pregnancy

Jagdish Singh Sudan v. Indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited

09 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5863
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant retiring just before the increment date is entitled to the notional increment earned for the preceding year for pensionary benefits, and directed its grant with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant notional increment annual increment superannuation pensionary benefits

Anubhav Mittal & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5662
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR alleging cheating through a digital marketing Ponzi scheme, emphasizing that investigation must proceed in multi-victim cases involving cognizable offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC

SOPL Private Limited v. Naveen Patel

09 Aug 2023 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2023:DHC:5734

The Delhi High Court held that a dispute involving a residential property leased partly for bed and breakfast services does not qualify as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and thus the suit must proceed as a civil suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 commercial dispute immovable property residential property

Rahul Kumar Meena v. Union of India

09 Aug 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:5587-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the CAT order on Delhi Police constable recruitment, noting the ongoing process to fill vacancies from the reserve panel through a committee without interfering.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment panel reserve list constable executive Delhi Police

Babita Bansal v. M/S Hari Om Chemicals

09 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5868

The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject a suit filed against her as the legal representative of her deceased husband, holding that the legal representatives of a sole proprietor are liable for the firm's debts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC sole proprietorship liability legal representative

Rabinder Jit Kaur v. Preet Public S. Sec. School and Ors.

09 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5789

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided school teachers are entitled to salary and arrears as per the 6th and 7th CPC under Section 10(1) of the DSEAR, invalidated waivers signed under coercion, and rejected financial hardship as a defense for non-payment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10(1) 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission