Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Dhruv Suri v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(5), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to allow the petitioner to submit documents and consider acquisition cost before passing reassessment order under Section 148 for AY 2016-17, granting 30 days to file Income Tax Return.
Shri Radha Enterprises v. M/S Tandoori Vibes
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit belated additional documents in a commercial suit, holding that negligence does not constitute reasonable cause under amended CPC provisions.
Harsh Prabhakar v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that Children’s Courts must pass reasoned orders under Section 19 of the Juvenile Justice Act before trying juveniles as adults, and that delays in preliminary assessments beyond three months are directory and do not vitiate proceedings.
Girijesh Kumar v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court quashed a blacklisting order passed without issuing a show cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing, holding that such procedural safeguards are mandatory before imposing the severe penalty of blacklisting.
Russell Corp Australia Pty Ltd. v. Ashok Mahajan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent's 'SHERRIN' trademark registration on grounds of non-use and bad faith, directing its removal from the register.
Lakshmi Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that pension under the SSS Pension Scheme accrues from the date of application if undisputed, directing payment of arrears with interest to the petitioner.
Arvind Kumar v. Manoj Kumari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaintiff's valuation for court fee and jurisdiction must ordinarily be accepted at the preliminary stage.
Akash Yadav v. The Director General, CRPF, CGO Complex & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of candidature for CRPF recruitment due to incorrect domicile details and failure to meet cut-off marks.
M/S CUTHBERT OCEANS LLP v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST RANGE 109 DIVISION ROHINI
The Delhi High Court set aside a vague show-cause notice and a cryptic retrospective GST registration cancellation order for violating natural justice and lacking sufficient particulars.
Gandharva Infrastructure and Projects Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld forfeiture of 100% earnest money deposit where the petitioner sought to modify a tender bid after acceptance of the work order, holding that such modification is impermissible and the omission of GST was not an inadvertent error.
Religare Advisors Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid income tax return filed under the old name cannot be treated as defective due to a subsequent name change, directing the department to process the original return for AY 2018-19.
Kishan Lal v. Sant Sunder Das Ji CGHS Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic arbitral award and Tribunal order in a cooperative society membership dispute, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with proper consideration of evidence and procedural fairness.
Jagmal Singh v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that enforcement of a private lease and challenge to a tender process cannot be pursued by writ petition and dismissed the petitioner’s claims as barred by laches and abuse of process.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. Cognyte Technologies Israel Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that consideration for sale of 'off the shelf' software by a foreign company does not constitute taxable royalty under the India-Israel DTAA and Income Tax Act.
Kamlesh Sharma v. Yogender Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court set aside a divorce decree granted on the ground of mental cruelty based on unproven allegations in pleadings, holding that such allegations do not constitute cruelty unless proved false or motivated and that the petitioner must plead and prove mental cruelty.
DISH TV INDIA LIMITED v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to treat the writ petition as a representation, hear the petitioner, and decide the matter with a reasoned order within ten weeks without expressing any opinion on merits.
Ashu Chaudhary v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a serious dowry harassment and gang rape case, holding that the gravity of allegations and prima facie evidence warranted denial of bail at this stage.
Braj Mohan Garg v. Krishna Maruti Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order granting leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that leave to defend is the rule and revisional interference is limited to jurisdictional errors.
Braj Mohan Garg v. Krishna Maruti Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order granting leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that leave to defend is the rule and revisional interference is limited to jurisdictional errors.
Ridgeview Construction (P) Ltd. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of the petitioner's property basement upon offer to deposit 20% of the municipal demand with interest, emphasizing conditional interim relief lapses on non-compliance.