Delhi High Court
31,024 judgments
Progressive Infotech Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to remit delayed refund amounts for AY 2020-21 and 2021-22 along with accrued interest to the petitioner within two weeks and called for inquiry into the delay.
Abhishek Manoj Warthi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that being on probation in a promoted rank does not disqualify a confirmed Indian Coast Guard member from applying for No Objection Certificate for outside employment, but resignation or discharge during engagement remains subject to statutory discretion.
Kundan Roy & Ors. v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi) Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power under section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Jayanta Kumar Mishra & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over loan repayment liability under builder-bank agreements must be adjudicated by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and declined to interfere with ongoing proceedings or direct RBI to frame new guidelines on subvention schemes.
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors v. Parmila Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing age relaxation based on valid Anganwadi Worker experience despite overlapping certificates, dismissing the DSSSB's challenge to the respondent's appointment.
GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ORS v. ARUN SINGH BHATTI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld that a BSc in Information Technology is not equivalent to the prescribed qualifications for the post of TGT (Computer Science) under recruitment rules.
Gaurav Aggarwal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S.S. Yadav v. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of adverse remarks in ACRs violates natural justice, entitling the petitioner to notional promotions with consequential benefits, while emphasizing adherence to promotion eligibility criteria.
Umang Dureja & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Food Corporation of India v. Sunita Kumari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed FCI's appeal, holding that employees are not entitled to additional increments under the SIA Scheme for periods before its effective date or without completing requisite service tenure.
Sanjay Kumar and Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Nitin Agarwal v. Amit Agarwal and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a petition challenging the NCDRC's order directing passport deposit since the petitioner filed a fresh application seeking the same relief.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Pawan Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award assessing 100% functional disability, affirmed insurer's liability despite invalid vehicle documents, and validated compensation for pain, suffering, amenities, and attendant charges with interest.
Ex-Constable S. Jagaoeesan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a 22-year delayed writ petition challenging dismissal from BSF service for unauthorized absence, affirming the primacy of discipline and procedural discretion under the BSF Act.
Arun Sood v. Hardit Kaur & Ors.
A tenant who was never in physical possession cannot challenge an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act; the proper remedy after eviction and sale is under Section 19 for recovery of possession.
Juglal Ram Chander v. Surinder Pal Jain
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant must pay use and occupation charges at market rates from the date of an Eviction Order pending final disposal, fixing interim charges and conditioning stay on timely payment.
Brijesh @Birju Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Laxman Singh v. The Director General Central Reserve Police Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging dismissal and rejection of a Mercy Petition, holding that prior withdrawal of a writ petition without liberty bars fresh petitions and that rejection of a non-statutory Mercy Petition does not create a fresh cause of action.
Amritraj & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties and exercised its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and promote social harmony.
Adithyan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment and disclosure of cut-off marks, holding that the petitioner did not qualify the prescribed cut-off and was duly informed thereof.