Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Varun Arya v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused father in a POCSO case after framing of charges, applying the higher threshold under Section 29 POCSO while considering delay in FIR and familial disputes.
Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Delhi High Court held that Delhi is the seat of arbitration conferring jurisdiction to extend time for arbitral award under Section 29A, allowing the petition for extension despite respondent's objections.
M/S NORTH INDIA TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. M/S HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and application for condonation of delay due to the petitioner's failure to provide sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in seeking restoration of a dismissed arbitration petition.
Sri Satya Sai University of Technology and Medical Sciences Sehore v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a medical college establishment application for non-submission through the prescribed online portal within the stipulated timeline, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines and procedures under the NMC Act, 2019.
Bipin Gujral v. CE Projects Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a minor typographical error in the legal notice amount does not invalidate the notice under Section 138 of the NI Act and restored the dismissed complaint for trial.
M/S MELLENIUM REALTECH PVT LTD v. M/S OPAQUE INFRASTUCTURE PVT LTD
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award that rejected specific performance of a collaboration agreement and upheld damages for illegal termination, affirming limited scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed continued enforcement of animal welfare laws in equine antibody production establishments, encouraged adoption of non-animal technologies, and mandated routine inspections to prevent cruelty under the PCA Act.
R D Gupta v. Permanand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a late-stage application to include a disputed property in a partition suit, holding that prior admissions preclude such claims and that delay tactics will not be permitted.
M/S. HANUMAN ENTERPRISES (OPC) PVT. LTD v. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that multiple GST investigations for the same period are barred only if an investigation has already been conducted, and dismissed the petition restraining DGGI Jaipur from investigating the petitioner company.
Steelman Telecom Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator after holding that the arbitration clause's appointment procedure lacked necessary impartiality and counterbalancing between parties.
Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on a minor, holding that minor contradictions in the child victim's testimony do not undermine its credibility and absence of injuries does not negate the offence.
MOTUL v. CHAWLA PACKAGING PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction, costs, and punitive damages to MOTUL against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving counterfeit product packaging.
Satyanand v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that disputed title over immovable property cannot be adjudicated in writ proceedings and must be resolved through civil suits.
Sh. Chitresh Vats v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside non-reasoned licence cancellation orders for violating natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh reasoned decision.
Som Nath Kalra v. Deepa Kalra & Ors.
The High Court rejected the plaintiff’s suit for partition as barred by Section 10 CPC due to a pending suit between the same parties for the same property, holding that pecuniary jurisdiction concerns do not justify concurrent suits.
M S Talwar Auto Garages Private Limited v. M S VE Commercial Vehicles Limited
The Delhi High Court held that designation of Delhi as the seat of arbitration confers exclusive jurisdiction on Delhi courts to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, notwithstanding a conflicting jurisdiction clause.
Swatika Jain v. Asian Hotels North Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application to set aside a consent order and restore an appeal, holding that an Arbitrator can decide Section 17 applications despite pending Section 13 proceedings and that counsel's concessions are binding on parties.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MOORTI DEVI
The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent's entitlement to an alternate plot despite delayed application and dismissed the government's delayed appeal for lack of justification.
Servotech Electricals Pvt Ltd v. Bennett University
The Delhi High Court held that a party may choose arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite an ambiguous arbitration clause referencing institutional rules, and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed Microsoft's appeal, holding that the divisional patent claims constitute a distinct invention under Section 16 of the Patents Act and remanded the matter for fresh examination on Section 3(k) grounds.