Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

Ujjwala Tiwari v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6638

The Delhi High Court upheld the regular bail granted in a murder case, ruling that bail cannot be cancelled without cogent supervening circumstances and proper exercise of judicial discretion.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation Section 302 IPC supervening circumstances interference with justice

Devender Damle v. Chetna Verma & Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5988

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that admitted signatures on cheques raise a presumption of debt which can only be rebutted by a probable defence, which the petitioner failed to establish.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Presumption under Section 139 NI Act Blank signed cheque

Manpreet Singh v. Tripat Kaur Kohli and Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's denial of permanent custody to a convicted father, emphasizing the child's welfare, while granting limited visitation rights.

family appeal_dismissed Significant custody Guardians and Wards Act welfare of child natural father

Shri 1008 Neminath Digamber Jain Samiti v. Union of India

21 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:6607-DB

The Delhi High Court held that rejection of an Income Tax registration application solely for physical filing when electronic filing was unavailable at the time is unjustified and set aside the rejection order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 12AA Section 80G physical filing

State v. Neeraj

21 Aug 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:6154-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt rape prosecutrix testimony contradictions in evidence

Nidhi Kapoor v. Principal Commissioner and Additional Secretary to the Government of India & Ors.

21 Aug 2023 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that gold imported without declaration or in violation of statutory conditions amounts to prohibited goods liable to confiscation, and discretionary redemption under Section 125 of the Customs Act is not mandatory in smuggling cases.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act 1962 prohibited goods gold import smuggling

Sameer Bajpai v. Dr Puneet Kumar Goel & Ors.

21 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6008

The Delhi High Court accepted the MCD's unconditional apology and compliance with demolition directions, discharged the contempt notice, and disposed of the contempt petition as satisfied, leaving pending unauthorized construction issues to be decided in a separate writ petition.

administrative petition_allowed Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 unconditional apology compliance with court directions unauthorized construction

Ramesh Kumar Bawalia v. Uttar Pradesh Samaj Society and Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:5827-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

Termination of a probationer in accordance with contract terms does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act and does not require a disciplinary inquiry unless stigmatic.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant retrenchment probationer Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 termination of service

Col Ashish Khanna SM Retd v. Delhi Gymkhana Club and Ors.

21 Aug 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 974
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 120-day limit under its Original Side Rules for filing written statements in non-commercial suits cannot be extended, dismissing the defendant's appeal and condonation application.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant written statement condonation of delay Delhi High Court Original Side Rules Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Ramesh Chand Aggarwal v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6081

The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner’s conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone, granting release accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed conviction sentence modification Section 279 IPC Section 304A IPC

M/S. GRAFFITI (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. VMS BATWARE PVT. LTD.

21 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:5974
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the trademark dispute petition due to non-prosecution following settlement and continuous non-appearance by the petitioner.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed non-prosecution settlement Intellectual Property Appellate Board transfer of cases

Uma Gogia v. Kiran Kumar

21 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5980

The Delhi High Court remanded the maintenance quantum for fresh determination, holding that only mandatory salary deductions are permissible while computing income under Section 125 Cr.P.C., and voluntary deductions cannot reduce maintenance payable.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. mandatory deductions voluntary deductions

Dolphin Mart Private Limited v. Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:5944
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's interim injunction application in a trademark dispute, holding no prima facie infringement or passing off by Defendants' 'DMART' marks and emphasizing the anti-dissection rule and the necessity of separate registration for exclusive rights over word elements.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off composite trademark deceptive similarity

Om Prakash v. State

21 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5983

The Delhi High Court held that police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is not mandatory when the complainant possesses evidence and can summon witnesses, dismissing the petition seeking FIR registration and investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. police investigation FIR registration cognizable offence

Vikash Choudhary & Anr. v. State & Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 308 IPC amicable settlement

Mufazzul Sheikh v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6039

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused involved in possession and circulation of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the offence's seriousness and its impact on the economy.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail counterfeit currency Section 439 Cr.P.C. Sections 489B and 489C IPC

Nishkarsh Singh Patel v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

21 Aug 2023 · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANER... · 2023:DHC:5956-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the denial of MBBS admission, holding that continuous study of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology together for two years at 10+2 level is mandatory under the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 MBBS eligibility criteria National Medical Commission NEET UG

Ali Jaan v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5987

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and modified sentence of the accused for rash and negligent driving causing death and grievous injuries in a motor accident, dismissing the revision petition.

criminal appeal_dismissed rash and negligent driving motor accident identity of accused Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC

Harjit Singh and Ors. v. State and Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6205
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Manohar Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.

21 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6083
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties in a private property dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR private dispute settlement forgery