Delhi High Court
63,783 judgments
Sunil Kumar Saxena v. Export Inspection Council
The High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the disciplinary removal and compulsory retirement orders against the appellant due to findings based on no evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review in departmental inquiries.
Dhiraj Kumar v. R H Agro Overseas Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order admitting belated replication and documents without prior leave, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural rules under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC in commercial suits.
Punjab National Bank & Anr. v. Harmeet Kaur Dhingra & Ors.
The High Court upheld that a mortgage created in violation of a court injunction restraining alienation is unenforceable, dismissing Punjab National Bank's claim to enforce security interest over the disputed property.
Rajveer Singh & Anr. v. PNB Housing Finance Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the amount paid by an auction purchaser cannot be adjusted against the borrower's pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act unless the borrower accepts the auction sale unequivocally.
Ajay Kumar Vashist v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld retrospective cancellation of government accommodation allotment due to material misrepresentations by the petitioner in his application, dismissing the writ petition.
DAV Public School and Anr. v. Komal Panwar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi School Tribunal's order reinstating a confirmed teacher terminated without due process under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.
Neha Das v. State Through SHO, PS Dwarka Sec-9
The Delhi High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition by enforcing a mutually agreed interim custody arrangement between estranged parents through a Memorandum of Understanding.
Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi (Central-3) v. Shyam Sunder Jindal
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the penalty notice does not specify the particular limb invoked, and dismissed the revenue's appeals accordingly.
New Shershah ITC v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the State Directorate and DGT to verify and upload eligible ITI students' admission data despite procedural delays, enabling them to appear in examinations, while allowing physical inspections subsequently.
Sh. Jaipal Kohli & Ors. v. Harish Kumar Kohli & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of a belated application for impleadment in a partition suit, holding that afterthought objections to relinquishment deeds and stamp duty cannot justify late impleadment and that cancellation of registered relinquishment deeds requires a separate civil suit.
Ajay Meena v. Airport Authority of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a review medical examination for a sensitive post, holding that mandamus cannot be issued without a clear legal right or statutory duty and that medical fitness decisions by competent authorities are final barring mala fide or arbitrariness.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court condoned a 350-day delay in re-filing an income tax appeal but closed the appeal as the issue was already decided in a prior judgment.
Convent of Jesus and Mary v. Director of Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that minority unaided schools are statutorily bound under Section 10 of the DSEAR Act, 1973 to pay teachers salaries and benefits at par with government schools, dismissing the petition challenging payment of arrears under ACP/MACP schemes.
Yogender Gupta & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304-A IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation payment, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Amar Jyoti Brahmachari v. Convent of Jesus & Mary School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to retiral benefits at par with government employees under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and denied the school's claim to recover alleged excess payments from the retired teacher.
Om Prakash v. Shamsher
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary extension of time for filing written statement beyond 90 days under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC, dismissing the revision petition for lack of jurisdictional error.
Pawan Kumar and Anr v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent futile litigation.
Deepak Khandelwal v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 67 of the CGST Act, currency and silver bars cannot be seized as goods liable for confiscation unless they have direct evidentiary value, and ordered their release due to non-issuance of confiscation notice within six months.
M/S UNILEC ENGINEERS LTD v. HPL ELECTRIC AND POWER LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to cure procedural defects in a written statement filed within limitation, setting aside the Trial Court's order striking it off, emphasizing adjudication on merits over technical non-compliance.
Babita Arya v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was refused to accused persons charged with cheating multiple buyers by selling the same property, distinguishing the Supreme Court's Ramesh Kumar ruling on monetary conditions for bail.