Delhi High Court

31,373 judgments

Year:

Rajveer Singh & Anr. v. PNB Housing Finance Limited & Anr.

18 Aug 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:5939-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the amount paid by an auction purchaser cannot be adjusted against the borrower's pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act unless the borrower accepts the auction sale unequivocally.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 18 pre-deposit auction sale borrower liability

Ajay Kumar Vashist v. Union of India

18 Aug 2023 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2023:DHC:6207

The Delhi High Court upheld retrospective cancellation of government accommodation allotment due to material misrepresentations by the petitioner in his application, dismissing the writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant government accommodation misrepresentation cancellation of allotment retrospective cancellation

DAV Public School and Anr. v. Komal Panwar

18 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:6208
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi School Tribunal's order reinstating a confirmed teacher terminated without due process under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 termination procedure confirmed employee

Neha Das v. State Through SHO, PS Dwarka Sec-9

18 Aug 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:6023-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition by enforcing a mutually agreed interim custody arrangement between estranged parents through a Memorandum of Understanding.

family petition_allowed habeas corpus custody minor child Memorandum of Understanding

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi (Central-3) v. Shyam Sunder Jindal

18 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the penalty notice does not specify the particular limb invoked, and dismissed the revenue's appeals accordingly.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act, 1961 penalty notice concealment of income

New Shershah ITC v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.

18 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3981

The Delhi High Court directed the State Directorate and DGT to verify and upload eligible ITI students' admission data despite procedural delays, enabling them to appear in examinations, while allowing physical inspections subsequently.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Training Institutes NIMI Portal NCVT-MIS Portal student admission verification

Sh. Jaipal Kohli & Ors. v. Harish Kumar Kohli & Ors.

17 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5976

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of a belated application for impleadment in a partition suit, holding that afterthought objections to relinquishment deeds and stamp duty cannot justify late impleadment and that cancellation of registered relinquishment deeds requires a separate civil suit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant impleadment partition suit relinquishment deed Order I Rule 10 CPC

Ajay Meena v. Airport Authority of India and Anr

17 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:6448
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a review medical examination for a sensitive post, holding that mandamus cannot be issued without a clear legal right or statutory duty and that medical fitness decisions by competent authorities are final barring mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ of mandamus Article 226 medical examination psychoactive substances

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited

17 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:6021-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned a 350-day delay in re-filing an income tax appeal but closed the appeal as the issue was already decided in a prior judgment.

tax appeal_dismissed condonation of delay income tax appeal Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Convent of Jesus and Mary v. Director of Education and Ors.

17 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:6255

The Delhi High Court held that minority unaided schools are statutorily bound under Section 10 of the DSEAR Act, 1973 to pay teachers salaries and benefits at par with government schools, dismissing the petition challenging payment of arrears under ACP/MACP schemes.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10 DSEAR Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Central Pay Commission

Yogender Gupta & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

17 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6437

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304-A IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation payment, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 304-A IPC compensation

Amar Jyoti Brahmachari v. Convent of Jesus & Mary School and Anr.

17 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2023:DHC:6450

The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to retiral benefits at par with government employees under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and denied the school's claim to recover alleged excess payments from the retired teacher.

labor petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits leave encashment gratuity Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Om Prakash v. Shamsher

17 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:6413

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary extension of time for filing written statement beyond 90 days under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC, dismissing the revision petition for lack of jurisdictional error.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC extension of time written statement Section 115 CPC

Pawan Kumar and Anr v. State and Anr

17 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6115

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent futile litigation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute 498A IPC

Deepak Khandelwal v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West & Anr.

17 Aug 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:5823-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 67 of the CGST Act, currency and silver bars cannot be seized as goods liable for confiscation unless they have direct evidentiary value, and ordered their release due to non-issuance of confiscation notice within six months.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 67 CGST Act seizure of goods definition of goods currency seizure

M/S UNILEC ENGINEERS LTD v. HPL ELECTRIC AND POWER LTD

17 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6001

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to cure procedural defects in a written statement filed within limitation, setting aside the Trial Court's order striking it off, emphasizing adjudication on merits over technical non-compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement curing defects Order VI Rule 15A CPC Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Babita Arya v. State of NCT of Delhi

17 Aug 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:5830
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Anticipatory bail was refused to accused persons charged with cheating multiple buyers by selling the same property, distinguishing the Supreme Court's Ramesh Kumar ruling on monetary conditions for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating forgery

Nipun Singhal v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Aug 2023 · Subramonium Prasad

The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a former company director, holding that mere possibility of future accusation and use of LOC for recovery of company dues cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21 Key Managerial Personnel

Sochipem Kashak v. State & Anr.

17 Aug 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6436

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354(A) IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 354(A) IPC Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement

State GNCT of Delhi v. Deepak Malhotra and Anr

17 Aug 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:6027
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discharge of one accused for lack of prima facie evidence under section 384 IPC, affirming the legal standard for framing charges requiring strong suspicion based on prosecution material.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge section 227 CrPC section 228 CrPC prima facie case