Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Dolphin Mart Private Limited v. Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's interim injunction application in a trademark dispute, holding no prima facie infringement or passing off by Defendants' 'DMART' marks and emphasizing the anti-dissection rule and the necessity of separate registration for exclusive rights over word elements.
Om Prakash v. State
The Delhi High Court held that police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is not mandatory when the complainant possesses evidence and can summon witnesses, dismissing the petition seeking FIR registration and investigation.
Vikash Choudhary & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Mufazzul Sheikh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused involved in possession and circulation of counterfeit currency, emphasizing the offence's seriousness and its impact on the economy.
Nishkarsh Singh Patel v. National Medical Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the denial of MBBS admission, holding that continuous study of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology together for two years at 10+2 level is mandatory under the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997.
Ali Jaan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and modified sentence of the accused for rash and negligent driving causing death and grievous injuries in a motor accident, dismissing the revision petition.
Harjit Singh and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Manohar Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties in a private property dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Yogesh Kumar Verma & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against accused persons for assault and arms offences, affirming that prima facie case exists and supplementary statements can validly add accused at the charge framing stage.
Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation v. M/S Power Mech Projects Limited
The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with deposit conditions under Section 36 does not warrant dismissal of a Section 34 challenge and remanded the matter for merits hearing after compliance.
Suresh Chand v. Management of Ramjas College & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that subsistence allowance ceases upon retirement and that alleged unequal treatment cannot be claimed on the basis of irregular benefits granted to others, dismissing the petitioner’s writ seeking subsistence allowance post superannuation and parity with a co-employee.
Mangesh Dhillod v. Bal Vikas Samiti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-reinstatement and back wages after the respondent school’s derecognition, holding that writ jurisdiction cannot reappraise facts and the managing committee’s decision on back wages was valid.
Neelam Goel v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious execution of maintenance orders and effective enforcement of warrants to ensure timely payment to a wife and her children, emphasizing the social welfare purpose of Section 125 Cr.P.C.
EASYPHOTOVOLTECH PVT LTD v. BENARA BEARINGS AND PISTONS LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that an interim arbitral award containing final observations does not bar final adjudication and directed deposit of the awarded amount with liberty for document inspection upon application.
Pele Khezhie v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court held that conciliation under the contract is directory, not mandatory, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from contract termination notices and non-performance declarations.
Deepak & Ors. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging DSSSB's inaction in recruitment, holding that the petitioners must first exhaust the alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Yves Saint Laurent Parfums S.A v. Vinod Asrani
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition to remove the expired trademark “WHITE OPIUM” from the register due to non-renewal and non-use.
State v. Ravinder @ Bittoo
The High Court set aside the discharge under section 376 IPC for failure to consider the FIR and section 164 statement, remanding the case for framing of charge after proper judicial scrutiny.
Gripple Limited & Anr. v. Absolute Air Solutions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the 'GRIPPLE' trademark after they undertook not to use it, with plaintiffs foregoing damages and costs.
TPF Getinsa Euroestudios, SL in Association with Segmental Consulting & Infrastructure Advisory (P) Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator as per contract terms and treated the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act as an application under Section 17 for interim reliefs, without deciding the merits of the termination dispute.