Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Yamini Mourya & Ors. v. Indian Olympic Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the revised selection criteria for Judo athletes for the Asian Games, dismissing the writ petition challenging non-selection of athletes despite their trial performance, emphasizing limited judicial interference in sports selection decisions.
Payel Chowdhury v. Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Indian women's Kabaddi team selection for the 2023 Asian Games, holding that courts should not interfere with expert sports selections absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
Manish Jain v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the procedural validity of the RBI’s Master Circular on Frauds by requiring banks to follow the principle of audi alteram partem before classifying accounts as fraud, relying on the Supreme Court’s interpretation.
Mukesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of economic offences and forgery, emphasizing the presumption of innocence, completion of investigation, and the need for stringent bail conditions to mitigate flight risk.
Tek Raj Saud v. The State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner charged with murder under Section 302 IPC, holding that the case prima facie attracts Section 304 Part II IPC and prolonged pre-trial detention without trial completion is unjust.
M/S Aggarwal Store v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of a Fair Price Shop licence, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory appeal remedies under the Delhi Specified Articles Order, 1981 before seeking judicial intervention.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. M/s Indian Trade Promotion Org.
The Delhi High Court held that entry fees to trade fairs primarily for trade promotion do not attract entertainment tax, but separate fees for entertainment events within the fair do, setting aside the Financial Commissioner's order exempting such entry fees.
Dakshinii Delhi Dharmik Ramlila Samiti v. Sports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Sports Authority of India must prevent abuse of its venue booking procedure and cannot grant arbitrary discounts violating Article 14, directing recovery of full fees from the party abusing the booking process.
Lal Bihari Singh Yadav & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that similarly situated employees are entitled to arrears of revised pay scales from 1996, rejecting delay and laches as a bar where the relief is declaratory in rem and mandating equal treatment under Article 14.
M.T.N.L. v. Mahindra Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that promotion eligibility requires qualifying the departmental examination and condonation of service interruption alone does not entitle retrospective promotion, setting aside CAT orders granting promotion from 1986 and upholding promotion from 2000.
Wonder Bricks v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order passed prematurely before the expiry of the time granted to the assessee to file a reply to the show cause notice.
Karuna Abhushan Private Limited v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for non-consideration of the assessee’s reply and denial of requested video-conferencing hearing, directing a fresh order in compliance with natural justice.
Kawatra Tent and Caterers Private Limited v. The Director (R.P. Cell) Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee has no right to occupy land beyond the license term and dismissed the petition seeking extension of occupation pending fresh tender completion.
Deepak Thukral v. Delhi Transco Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking Third Time Bound Promotional Scale, holding the petitioner was not entitled to it under the service rules and the denial was lawful.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, Delhi v. M/S Bio-Rad Laboratories (Singapore) Pte Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that services provided by a Singapore company to its Indian affiliate did not constitute Fees for Technical Services under the India-Singapore DTAA as the 'make available' test was not satisfied.
Kamlesh Kumar Jha v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -15, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside non-speaking transfer orders under Section 127 of the Income-tax Act lacking recorded reasons and DIN, emphasizing mandatory compliance with procedural and substantive requirements.
Incredible Unique Buildcon Private Limited v. Office of the Income Tax Officer Ward (12) (1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, an assessee is entitled to credit for tax deducted at source even if the deductor fails to deposit the tax or issue Form 16A, and the revenue cannot indirectly recover such tax by adjusting refunds.
Jamal Ranjha v. Chandra Prakash Pandey
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to complete the long-pending murder trial within six months, affirming the accused’s fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21 despite prior abscondence.
M/S CREATING IMAGINATIONS v. M/S ALPHA RADIOS
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that only the plaint's averments are relevant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that no jurisdictional error warranted revision under Section 115 CPC.
Anshul Jain v. Nitin Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion where the wife denied conjugal rights and left the matrimonial home without cause.