Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

K. S. Mehta v. M/S Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd.

28 Nov 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:8626
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an independent non-executive director can be held liable under section 141 of the NI Act if the complaint specifically averred his responsibility for the company's business conduct at the time of cheque dishonour.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Dishonour of cheque

World Class Automobiles P Ltd v. MCM Service Pvt Ltd

28 Nov 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2009 (111) DRJ 129 (DB)
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to condone a 605-day delay in filing the written statement in a civil suit, dismissing the petition challenging the order under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed condonation of delay written statement Article 227 Section 5 Limitation Act

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Hari Prasad Kamkar & Ors.

28 Nov 2023 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:8422
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation to the deceased cleaner's family under the Employee's Compensation Act, affirming that a cleaner engaged by a driver is deemed an employee of the vehicle owner.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship cleaner motor vehicle accident

Jagdish Singh Shary v. Central Adoption Resource Authority

28 Nov 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:8627

The Delhi High Court directed CARA to issue a No Objection Certificate for an inter-country adoption under HAMA, emphasizing CARA’s binding obligation and rejecting issuance of only a support letter.

family petition_allowed Significant Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 Central Adoption Resource Authority No Objection Certificate inter-country adoption

Shubham Chopra v. Union of India

28 Nov 2023 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:8612-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the JAG Entry Scheme's eligibility criteria, including mandatory CLAT PG 2023 scores and criminal record disqualifications, dismissing the PIL challenging retrospective application and arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant JAG Entry Scheme CLAT PG 2023 eligibility criteria retrospective application

Reshma & Ors. v. Union of India

28 Nov 2023 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:8462
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Railways are strictly liable to compensate the legal heirs of a passenger who died falling from a moving train despite alleged violation of MST travel rules, setting aside the Railway Claims Tribunal's dismissal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 Section 124-A untoward incident

American Epay Services Private Limited v. Orbit In-Te-Rio

28 Nov 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6743

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a sole arbitrator and referring the dispute arising from a Fit-out Lease Agreement to arbitration under DIAC rules.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Section 12(2)

Amarjeet Singh v. Gurpreet Singh & Anr.

24 Nov 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:8823

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of an application to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that triable issues cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage and the High Court’s revisional jurisdiction is limited to jurisdictional errors.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Rejection of plaint Section 115 CPC revisional jurisdiction Triable issues

Sandhya Gupta v. Bhanu Gupta & Anr.

24 Nov 2023 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:8517

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator upon parties' consent and directed maintenance of status quo over partnership properties pending arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 11 Section 17

Rajinder Singh Chadha v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs

24 Nov 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:8429
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that PMLA proceedings cannot continue without a valid predicate scheduled offence, quashing investigation related to compounded and quashed FIRs but allowing continuation based on a fresh FIR.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 predicate offence scheduled offence Enforcement Case Information Report

Vishesh Aggarwal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Nov 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:8438

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious offences of extortion and assault, holding that compromise between parties does not warrant quashing when investigation is pending.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC extortion physical assault

M/S Prasad Process Pvt Ltd v. Kasturi Rajan & Ors.

24 Nov 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:8456

The High Court allowed the petition to set aside the trial court's dismissal of an application without merit hearing, directing a fresh hearing subject to costs, emphasizing the right to be heard and addressing trial delays.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Order XVI Rule 1 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC

Ms. Suman and Ors. v. Praveen Kumar & Ors.

24 Nov 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:8464

The Delhi High Court transferred a partition suit to itself from the Trial Court after the petitioners sought to amend the plaint to enhance valuation, thereby ousting the Trial Court's pecuniary jurisdiction, to avoid restarting proceedings de novo.

civil appeal_allowed transfer of suit pecuniary jurisdiction valuation of suit Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Sunita Aggarwal v. Mahinder Singh & Anr.

24 Nov 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:8465

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to transfer a civil suit to the court of proper territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing that suits should not proceed in courts lacking jurisdiction even if the objection is raised belatedly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant transfer of suit territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order XXII Rule 10 CPC

Gayanwati & Ors. v. Mukesh & Ors.

24 Nov 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:8466

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation by determining the deceased's income based on commission evidence rather than minimum wages in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency income determination commission income

Irfan Saifi @ Bona v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

24 Nov 2023 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:8585

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that Section 50 notice is mandatory only for personal searches and the embargo under Section 37 applies, barring bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail in NDPS cases commercial quantity

Anil Kumar Jha v. Shankar Lal (SD) Through LRs

24 Nov 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:8458

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a late-stage amendment application in an eviction petition, holding that subsequent facts can be argued at final arguments without formal amendment, and emphasizing expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act amendment of pleadings

N P M Distributors & Ors. v. Clide International Pvt Ltd & Anr.

24 Nov 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:8460

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order striking off the defence of defendants for failure to file written statement within 120 days from summons service under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, dismissing the petition challenging the order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Written statement Striking off defence

Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.

24 Nov 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:8449

The Delhi High Court directed banks and entities to cooperate diligently with Cyber Crime Cells by appointing nodal officers and responding to police queries, and called for coordinated efforts among state Cyber Crime Cells under the Ministry of Home Affairs to effectively combat cybercrime.

administrative other Procedural Cyber Crime Cell Banks Nodal Officer Google LLC

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt Krishna and Others

24 Nov 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:8467

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the motor accident claim award based on credible eyewitness testimony and absence of contributory negligence evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(4) rash and negligent driving contributory negligence