Delhi High Court
64,254 judgments
M/S ITH HYDROLICS PVT LTD v. M/S PRABHDIT ASSOCIATES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 20,000 per month for a commercial tenant post eviction order, applying Supreme Court principles on market rent determination.
Paramvir Singh v. Presidium Breweries Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dissolved Presidium Breweries Pvt Ltd under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator due to absence of assets and funds to continue winding up.
Radheyshyam v. Mange Lal @ Mange Ram
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay of execution proceedings on condition of monthly payment of use and occupation charges pending appeal against dismissal of application to set aside ex-parte decree.
H.R. Sharma v. Delhi and District Cricket Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DDCA Ombudsman's order and AGM agenda, holding that the petitioner must seek redressal before the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013, as writ jurisdiction is not available when alternate efficacious remedies exist.
Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited and Ors. v. UEM India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pending arbitration proceedings do not bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petition to quash the complaint.
Amarjeet Kaur v. Usha Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging ex-parte orders due to inordinate delay and abuse of process, affirming that supervisory jurisdiction is not a remedy for negligence in civil suit proceedings.
Smt. Surinder Kaur & Ors. v. S Rajdev Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XVI Rule 1A CPC, a party may examine a witness not named in the original list of witnesses without prior permission, provided the witness is produced without Court assistance.
MS. SHOBHNA SARBHAI v. DR. SANJEEV SAXENA
The Delhi High Court condoned a 471-day delay in filing an appeal under the DV Act, emphasizing liberal construction of limitation rules in welfare legislation and restoring the appeal for hearing on merits.
M.K. Makkar v. Ghanshyam Dass Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 directing the Executing Court to permit E-Auction of immovable property in execution proceedings through a recognized government agency, applying physical auction rules mutatis mutandis.
Nidhi Jain v. Rani Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interim protection orders under the Domestic Violence Act do not bar a partition suit and dismissed the petition seeking dismissal of the suit on grounds of concealment and lack of possession.
Rajesh Chauhan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' claim for retrospective promotion to Assistant Commandant and benefits under the Old Pension Scheme as per the relevant Office Memorandum, directing timely grant of consequential benefits.
Pankaj Kapoor v. M/S Weston Electronics Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that fees payable to the Official Liquidator under Section 451(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, are liquidation expenses payable prior to distribution to workmen and creditors under Section 529A, dismissing the appeal challenging such payment priority.
Yashovardhan Birla v. Kamdhenu Enterprises Limited and Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed applications seeking dismissal of NI Act complaint quashing petitions and initiation of perjury proceedings, holding non-disclosure of earlier withdrawn petitions was not deliberate concealment.
Jayaveer Singh @ Jayavir Singh v. Jitender & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, increasing compensation by properly assessing income, functional disability at 85%, and future prospects, while upholding the award for prosthetic leg without enhancement.
Saurabh Bansal v. Nitin Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside an ex-parte order in a civil recovery suit, restoring the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness subject to strict terms and costs.
M/s Kaushalya Prem Bhatia Trust & Ors. v. Sh. Rajinder Mehto
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a civil suit challenging a Will to be tried along with a probate petition involving the same Will to avoid multiplicity of litigation and conflicting judgments.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Poonam Rana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, affirming entitlement to tuition fee reimbursement and rejecting contributory negligence and mitigating employment claims without evidence.
Union of India v. Dr. Suchita Ninawe
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful recovery of excess Transport Allowance paid to a Scientist 'G', holding that recovery within five years is permissible unless extreme hardship is proven, overruling the Tribunal's order setting aside recovery.
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd v. Rishi Pal Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that civil suits challenging simple mortgage enforcement under the SARFAESI Act are barred by Section 34, setting aside trial court injunctions and directing parties to pursue statutory remedies before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Sh. Uma Shankar Sharma v. M/S High Line Apparels Private Limited
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the summary suit decree as the appellant failed to comply with the conditional deposit required for leave to defend.