Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
N P M Distributors & Ors. v. Clide International Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order striking off the defence of defendants for failure to file written statement within 120 days from summons service under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, dismissing the petition challenging the order.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed banks and entities to cooperate diligently with Cyber Crime Cells by appointing nodal officers and responding to police queries, and called for coordinated efforts among state Cyber Crime Cells under the Ministry of Home Affairs to effectively combat cybercrime.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt Krishna and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the motor accident claim award based on credible eyewitness testimony and absence of contributory negligence evidence.
Deepak Thukral v. Delhi Transco Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant was not entitled to the Third Time Bound Promotional Scale as per the applicable policy and procedural requirements.
Jatin Khurana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging Customs circulars on compulsory disposal of seized gold jewellery for lack of locus standi, holding that only directly aggrieved or disadvantaged persons can maintain such litigation.
Majibullah Mohammad Haneef v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the extradition of the petitioner to Oman after finding the extradition inquiry complied with legal requirements and diplomatic assurances ensured a fair trial.
Resilient Innovations Private Limited v. Ashneer Grover
The Delhi High Court directed that a petition for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act be treated as an application under Section 17 and referred to the arbitral tribunal, maintaining interim injunction restraining disclosure of confidential information.
Citius Real Estate (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that refund claims for unused stamp duty beyond six months from purchase are maintainable if the purchaser was unaware within six months that the stamp paper would not be used, upholding constitutional validity of Section 54 but reading down Section 54(c) to avoid arbitrariness.
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Anr. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that GST is payable on composite services involving supply of goods exceeding 25% of invoice value and directed MCD to reimburse the GST paid by the petitioners with interest.
IB & W Communication P. Ltd. v. M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd.
The Delhi High Court ordered dissolution of M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the Official Liquidator could not proceed with winding up due to absence of assets and funds.
M/S ITH HYDROLICS PVT LTD v. M/S PRABHDIT ASSOCIATES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 20,000 per month for a commercial tenant post eviction order, applying Supreme Court principles on market rent determination.
Paramvir Singh v. Presidium Breweries Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dissolved Presidium Breweries Pvt Ltd under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator due to absence of assets and funds to continue winding up.
Radheyshyam v. Mange Lal @ Mange Ram
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay of execution proceedings on condition of monthly payment of use and occupation charges pending appeal against dismissal of application to set aside ex-parte decree.
H.R. Sharma v. Delhi and District Cricket Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DDCA Ombudsman's order and AGM agenda, holding that the petitioner must seek redressal before the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013, as writ jurisdiction is not available when alternate efficacious remedies exist.
Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited and Ors. v. UEM India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pending arbitration proceedings do not bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petition to quash the complaint.
Amarjeet Kaur v. Usha Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging ex-parte orders due to inordinate delay and abuse of process, affirming that supervisory jurisdiction is not a remedy for negligence in civil suit proceedings.
Smt. Surinder Kaur & Ors. v. S Rajdev Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XVI Rule 1A CPC, a party may examine a witness not named in the original list of witnesses without prior permission, provided the witness is produced without Court assistance.
MS. SHOBHNA SARBHAI v. DR. SANJEEV SAXENA
The Delhi High Court condoned a 471-day delay in filing an appeal under the DV Act, emphasizing liberal construction of limitation rules in welfare legislation and restoring the appeal for hearing on merits.
M.K. Makkar v. Ghanshyam Dass Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 directing the Executing Court to permit E-Auction of immovable property in execution proceedings through a recognized government agency, applying physical auction rules mutatis mutandis.
Nidhi Jain v. Rani Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interim protection orders under the Domestic Violence Act do not bar a partition suit and dismissed the petition seeking dismissal of the suit on grounds of concealment and lack of possession.