Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Avtar Singh @ Ram Avtar & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under various IPC sections on the basis of a voluntary compromise between the parties in a private dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Pran Nath & Ors. v. State (Through SHO PS Mandawali) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR related to a property dispute following an amicable settlement and refund of the amount, imposing a cost on the petitioners.
Vivek Kohli & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord based on an amicable settlement and voluntary compensation, subject to cost payment.
SH SAMEER SEHGAL & ORS. v. THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Tulsi Gautam & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under its inherent powers, holding that amicable settlement between parties justifies quashing non-compoundable offences to prevent abuse of court process.
Vijay Pal Negi v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and absence of grievance, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
MD MIRAZ AND ORS v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving both compoundable and non-compoundable offences on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS.
BLS-E Services Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a bidder cannot claim the experience of its subsidiaries to meet mandatory eligibility criteria in a tender, dismissing the petition challenging disqualification on this ground.
BLS-E Services Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a bidding company cannot rely on the experience of its subsidiaries to meet mandatory eligibility criteria in a government tender and dismissed the petition challenging disqualification on this ground.
Jaipal Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant was not a bona fide passenger with a valid ticket on the date of injury and thus not entitled to compensation for an untoward incident under the Railways Act, 1989.
Kent RO Systems Limited v. Kent Cables Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark 'KENT' for fans, recognizing the respondents' prior use and acquiescence by the appellants.
Gulab v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder and attempt to murder, holding that the gravity of the offence and risk to witnesses outweigh the delay in trial.
Vikas Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a fraud case due to the prosecution’s improbable case and prior acquittals in related matters.
MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED v. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing Man Industries' claims for wrongful withholding under Price Reduction Schedule, CST reimbursement, and interest, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Madhu Malti Saini v. Rajesh Saini and Ors
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's execution orders, ruling that the decree holder had locus standi to enforce the settlement decree and that the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to correcting patent illegality or perversity.
Yasir Ayaz v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus for return of minor children to the UK, holding that custody with the mother is lawful, foreign orders are not mechanically enforceable, and custody disputes must be decided by the competent civil court prioritizing the child's welfare.
Varun Malhotra v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking return of a minor child to Canada, holding that custody with the biological mother in India is not illegal detention and that custody disputes require detailed inquiry by the Family Court prioritizing the child's welfare.
GALAXY INFRA AND ENGINEERING PVT LTD v. PRAVIN ELECTRICALS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing the claim due to non-execution of the consultancy agreement and held that limited judicial interference under Section 34 does not permit re-appreciation of evidence.
Shambhu Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Bail was denied to the accused in a serious POCSO and IPC case due to violation of surrender undertaking and gravity of offence despite absence of DNA evidence.
Rakesh Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual offence case due to prosecutrix's non-cooperation, refusal of medical examination, and incomplete investigation records.