Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Yasin & Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 308 and 323 IPC but modified the sentence to grant probation to the appellants, emphasizing rehabilitation over further incarceration.
Pardip Kumar and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Sections 354/354B IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Bhavy @ Somi & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under the BNSS on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power to prevent abuse of court process where the possibility of conviction is remote.
Ashwani Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court suspended the sentences of six appellants convicted for forgery and criminal conspiracy involving falsified cooperative society records, holding that serious evidentiary issues warrant detailed appellate scrutiny and granting bail pending appeal.
Neeraj Yadav v. Ashwani Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing petitioners to display advertisements inside a mall without mandatory registration pending final adjudication, directing joint inspection and compliance with prior orders.
Arjun Sharma v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a serious stabbing and murder case, holding that prima facie evidence and risk of tampering outweigh the petitioner’s liberty interests at this stage.
Sgt Manish Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay v. 671430 EX WO Pravin Kumar Pawar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension despite the Release Medical Board's contrary finding.
Manjit Singh Dhaliwal v. Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation 01 New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax return, affirming that ignorance of law and general hardship do not justify extension beyond statutory deadlines under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Subhash Kantilal Pawar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition to quash a corruption FIR against a police hawaldar, holding that prima facie material at the investigation stage warrants continuation of proceedings and alternative remedies must be pursued.
Hardik Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed a petition directing a further thorough investigation into a murder case due to lapses and incompleteness in the original police investigation, emphasizing the court's power under Article 226 to ensure justice through proper inquiry.
Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd
The Bombay High Court upheld CIDCO's cancellation of a tender despite the petitioner being the highest bidder, holding that no vested right arises without issuance of allotment letter and judicial interference in bona fide commercial decisions is limited.
Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL seeking CBI investigation into the Lavasa Project, holding that delay, availability of statutory remedies, and prior dismissal of related PILs preclude judicial interference.
Bhutani Automobiles LLP v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST demand order, deferring the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court’s pending decision.
Sanju & Ors. v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 308 and 323/34 IPC but modified sentences by releasing appellants on probation considering their conduct and social circumstances.
Mahendra Kumar Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 304A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, holding that inherent powers can be exercised when gross negligence is not established and continuation of trial would be an abuse of process.
CLEARMEDI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 4(2), DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must exercise judicial discretion under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act and cannot mandate a 20% pre-deposit as a condition for stay of demand, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration.
Union of India v. Ved Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order restoring pay and pensionary benefits of an employee promoted despite medical unfitness, ruling that pay cannot be retrospectively corrected after long service in the promotional post.
IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO LTD v. LACHHMAN SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the insurer's liability for a fatal motor accident, modified compensation by adjusting tax deductions and non-pecuniary damages, rejected contributory negligence, and reduced interest rate from 10% to 9% per annum.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Mahesh Chand Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award including medical expenses without original bills and loss of income for a retired 75-year-old victim, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
J.P. Industries v. Directorate General of Health Services, Central Procurement Agency, GNCTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a bidder’s technical bid due to blacklisting for supplying substandard drugs, affirming that blacklisting in respect of even one drug justifies disqualification in public health tenders.