Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Delhi Development Authority v. Kunal Food Products Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is absolute and unextendible, dismissing the petition challenging the arbitral award filed beyond the prescribed period.
Manoj Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a property dispute case involving forged documents and conspiracy, given serious allegations and non-cooperation with investigation.
K Vinod Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that personnel promoted through LDCE are entitled to Grade Pay 4200 under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, setting aside the denial of such benefit to the petitioner.
Oma Kant Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied in a serious cyber fraud case involving 'digital arrest' due to the necessity of custodial interrogation and insufficient evidence supporting the petitioner’s claim of being a victim.
Ajit Kumar Jena; Gopal Chaturvedi; Ramakant Shankarmal Pilani v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications in a ₹20 crore loan fraud case involving allegations of cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy, holding that no ground for bail exists pending investigation and trial.
Union of India v. Kapil Gurjar
The Delhi High Court allowed a review petition to record the respondent's disputed stand on the nonconstitution of an appellate Medical Board but dismissed the petition without altering the original judgment's outcome.
Sushil Kumar Soni & Ors. v. Ravinder
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants to admit additional documents as evidence in a civil appeal after demonstrating due diligence and the necessity of such evidence for proper adjudication.
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. M/S MANJU TRADERS & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that pendency of a Section 8 application does not bar appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 and appointed the arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement despite parallel civil proceedings.
Sanjay Kumar Sain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that judicial scrutiny of lower court orders does not impugn judicial officers' integrity absent specific adverse findings and dismissed the recall application seeking expunging of remarks against a judicial officer.
Minor Child K & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside bailable warrants against a minor victim and directed strict adherence to POCSO Act safeguards and judicial guidelines to protect child victims during trial, endorsing video-conferencing and limiting victim presence during bail hearings to prevent re-traumatization.
M. THANIGIVELU AND ORS. v. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD
The Supreme Court held that the seniority of directly recruited Assistant Engineers must be reckoned from their initial appointment date including training period, rejecting retrospective reduction of training period for seniority purposes.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma v. State of Bihar & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a parricide case due to unreliable dying declarations and flawed investigation, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards and fair trial standards.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. M/s R.V. Anderson Associates Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award, ruling that the arbitration clause was enabling, the tribunal was properly constituted, and MCGM waived its right to object by participating without timely challenge.
MONIVEDA CONSULTANTS LLP AND ANOTHER v. SHAJAS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS
The Supreme Court directed maintenance of status quo and granted interim protection in a corporate oppression and mismanagement dispute, modifying the NCLAT order and expediting adjudication by the NCLT.
Union of India v. Rohith Nathan
The Supreme Court upheld the 1993 Office Memorandum excluding parental salary income from creamy layer determination, invalidated the 2004 letter's contrary application, and ruled that inclusion of salary income for PSU employees without equivalence constitutes unconstitutional discrimination.
Prabhu Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that imposing an arbitrary upper disability limit in reservation violates the RPwD Act and constitutional equality, directing appointment of a 90% disabled advocate who qualified the selection.
Dablu v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of appellants as members of an unlawful assembly responsible for the murder of Balkishan, affirming vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC despite procedural lapses and some discrepancies in evidence.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
The Supreme Court disposed of the longstanding environmental writ petition filed by M.C. Mehta, restructuring it into focused suo moto cases and transferring certain matters to the Delhi High Court to enhance judicial efficiency and effective environmental governance.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
The Supreme Court formally closed the four-decade-old writ petition on Taj Mahal's environmental protection, transitioning ongoing issues into structured Suo Moto cases to ensure focused and sustainable judicial oversight.
MS VELOCIS SYSTEMS PVT LTD v. NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE SERVICES INCORPORATED NICSI
The Court directed the tender rejection challenge to be treated as a representation to be decided within two weeks, staying financial bid opening until then, ensuring procedural fairness in tender evaluation amidst a stay on blacklisting.