Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vansh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the injured persons' no objection, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
ITW GSE APS & Anr. v. Dabico Airport Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed deletion of defendant no. 3 from a patent infringement suit, holding that a holding company is not liable for its subsidiary's acts absent exceptional circumstances.
Union of India & Anr v. M/S Shriram Coconut Products (P) Limited & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that desiccation of coconuts amounts to preservation under Schedule I of the EPF Act, interpreting 'coconut' by its dictionary meaning as a fruit, thereby including the respondent's industry within the Act's ambit.
Commissioner of Customs Airport v. M/S Entire Logistics Pvt Ltd
The High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal, holding that revocation of a Customs Broker License based on an order beyond the scope of a vague show cause notice violates natural justice.
Bimal Kumar Jana v. Santa Dey & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging respondent's membership in a co-operative society, holding no disqualification under Rule 25(1)(c) of the 1973 Rules and emphasizing locus standi and limitation bar.
Mohd. Zia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary compromise between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Hanif Khan and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Neendar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.
Rajat Goel & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences arising from a family dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS.
Shanur Rehman v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following a full and final compromise between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Vikas Datika & Ors. v. The State GNCTD & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement through mediation, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
Renu v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that eviction under the Senior Citizens Act cannot override a woman's right to reside in a shared household under the Domestic Violence Act, setting aside an eviction order against the petitioner.
Gopal Krishan Puri v. UCO Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the eviction petition's dismissal due to the landlord's failure to prove bona fide requirement and non-availability of alternate suitable accommodation under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
SH Vipin Kaul v. Smt Kanta Deshwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's jurisdiction under Section 9(1) of the Guardians and Wards Act, holding that the minor child's ordinary residence was Delhi at the time of filing, and dismissed the petition challenging custody proceedings.
Corporation Bank v. Harvinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the mesne profits awarded against a public sector bank to reflect the actual wrongful gain based on the rent paid by the bank, reducing the rate from Rs.200 to Rs.138 per sq. ft., and adjusted the interest calculation accordingly.
Sh. P.K. Chawla v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld recovery of unauthorized retrospective transport allowance paid without requisite documentation but denied interest, emphasizing judicial discretion in excess payment recovery absent fraud.
Ram Ugrah Sharma v. Kanchan Mala
A civil suit for malicious prosecution is premature and not maintainable until the acquittal in the criminal case attains finality after disposal of all appeals.
Nikhil Nanda v. Neeraj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of warrants of attachment without prior notice in execution proceedings filed within two years of a decree passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Neeraj v. Deepak Gupta
The Delhi High Court set aside ex parte proceedings against the defendant, allowing him to contest the suit and cross-examine the plaintiff, subject to payment of costs.
M/S COSCO BLOSSOMS PVT LTD v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award relying solely on a defective surveyor's report, emphasizing that such reports are evidentiary and not binding, and held that judicial interference under Section 34 is warranted where an award ignores vital evidence and is perverse.