Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Superior Packagings Private Limited v. Pioneer Securities Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.
RRJ Infrastructure Company Private Limited; Fountain Beverages Private Limited v. Pearl Drinks Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to dispense with convening meetings of the transferee company's shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation involving wholly owned subsidiaries under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Capital Electrotech Limited v. Capital Urjatech Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given their written consent.
Stratford Academy Limited v. FIITJEE Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where the transferor is a wholly owned subsidiary and all consents were obtained.
Avanti Bristlers Private Limited v. W.H. Targett India Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing two transferor companies to merge into a transferee company and stand dissolved without winding up.
Naveen Import Private Limited v. Ekta Infratech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of seven transferor companies into one transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after no objections were raised by statutory authorities.
Bright Lifecare Private Limited v. 1MG Technologies Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for demerger between Bright Lifecare Private Limited and 1MG Technologies Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, finding all procedural and substantive requirements satisfied.
Vikas Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the executive cannot grant parole during the pendency of a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court, following the binding ratio in K.M. Nanavati.
CONCLAVE PHARMA PVT LTD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that an inadvertent clerical error in a bank guarantee does not render a tender bid non-responsive if the bank's liability remains clear, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's bid.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lava International Ltd
The Delhi High Court emphasized strict adherence to trial schedules under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, rejecting the defendant's attempts to delay a patent infringement suit and directing expeditious completion of trial.
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Assistant Director of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a subsidiary assessed independently on arm's length basis cannot be deemed a Permanent Establishment of its foreign parent for reassessment without tangible material indicating income escaping assessment.
Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Mohan Exports India P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that unregistered property over which the Assessee has possession and control belongs to the Assessee for wealth tax purposes, allowing Revenue's appeals for certain assessment years while dismissing others based on factual findings and statutory interpretation.
Union of India v. Laxmi Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing regularization of casual laborers despite their failure to meet medical standards applicable to new recruits, emphasizing their long-term efficient service.
Varsha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 18 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and dismissed the petition challenging an eviction order passed under this provision.
Deepak Vohra v. Union of India & Ors
Delhi High Court directed respondents to sympathetically consider petitioner's request for accommodation allotment due to personal and educational hardships and decide within two weeks.
Reliance Capital Limited v. C& C Construction Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed execution petitions as withdrawn after the decree holder informed the court of an amicable settlement between the parties.
Kamlesh Kumari v. The Managing Committee DCM Girls Sr Sec School & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to seek early hearing before the Single Judge and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Hemlata v. State
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection from arrest to Hemlata on humanitarian grounds subject to cooperation with investigation, while dismissing Rakesh's bail application as withdrawn.
Rohit Kaushik & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, finding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a factional clash at FCI premises.