Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a factional dispute at the Food Corporation of India.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, ruling that formation of an unlawful assembly with a common object entails collective liability despite variations in eyewitness testimony.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, affirming that premeditated unlawful assembly with common object attracts collective liability, while allowing release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a factional fight at FCI premises.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, affirming that a premeditated unlawful assembly with common object can be held liable despite variations in eyewitness identification.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, ruling that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence, and dismissed their appeals except those abated due to death.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence, and dismissed their appeals while confirming release on probation.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with common object to commit the offence.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, finding that appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit offence during a violent clash between union factions.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit offences during a violent clash at FCI premises.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit offences during a violent clash between rival union factions.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a union rivalry at FCI premises.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of appellants for rioting as members of an unlawful assembly with a common object, dismissing their appeals and confirming liability under Section 149 IPC.
Haridwar Parsad Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a union rivalry at FCI premises.
Bhola Rishi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Bhola Rishi for gang rape under Section 376(2)(g) IPC based on credible victim testimony and conclusive DNA evidence, dismissing his appeal and awarding victim compensation.
Bhagwan Dass v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Bhagwan Dass for kidnapping and raping an 8-year-old girl, emphasizing the sufficiency of credible victim testimony supported by medical evidence despite inconclusive DNA results, and directed victim compensation.
Baani Facilities Management Private Limited v. Baani Technology Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transferor company's dissolution without winding up and clarifying compliance on company name retention.
SLN Piedmont Development Company Private Limited v. Piedmont Development Company Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Basera Realtech Private Limited & Ors. v. SRK Tradelinks Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between eleven transferor companies and a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.
Trans American Travels (India) Private Limited v. Trans American Information Systems Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, approving the merger and dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.