Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Priya Desh Gupta v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessments based on a mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material is impermissible, quashing reassessment notices issued to promoter shareholders on non-compete fee taxability.
Bharat Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court condoned a 694-day delay in filing a land acquisition appeal, emphasizing a liberal, justice-oriented approach to 'sufficient cause' under the Limitation Act to avoid injustice to rural landowners.
Sarvjit Singh Slaria v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to accept and shift to allotted government accommodations by a specified date, emphasizing timely compliance with procedural requirements including issuance of No Accommodation Certificates.
Deepak Vohra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's personal hardships sympathetically in allotting official accommodation and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Lt. Col Ar Harish v. Union of India
The court allowed petitioner No.1 to retain government accommodation till 12.06.2016 without market rent, subject to bearing rent already paid for May 2016, balancing changed circumstances with administrative interests.
Lt Col Amit Chatterjee v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is not liable to pay market rent for existing accommodation until he occupies the offered premises or the offer is reallocated, with future rent demands subject to due process.
Delhi Metro Corporation Ltd. v. Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed additional documentary evidence on land user classification under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC to ensure comprehensive adjudication of compensation in a land acquisition dispute.
Santosh Malik & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that a basement used as a bank cellar is excluded from FAR calculation under applicable bye-laws, directing DDA to regularize the building and quashing demolition orders based on basement area counting.
Dilbagh Singh & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 451, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rohit Srivastava v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sunny Sehgal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Mohd. Anis & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a minor Muslim girl who has attained puberty has the right to reside with her husband and that such marriage is voidable, not void, under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
Green Box Sales Private Limited v. StyleGenie Digital Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Green Box Sales Private Limited and StyleGenie Digital Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
BGK Commodities Private Limited v. BGK Infratech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of four transferor companies into a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after due compliance and no objections.
Bankey Bihari Marketing Private Limited v. Suridhi Commercial Infra Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between closely held companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding no objections and compliance with procedural requirements.
Payal Polyplast Private Limited v. Payal Petrochem Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Payal Polyplast Private Limited and Payal Petrochem Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after requisite approvals and compliance with statutory requirements.
DCM Engineering Limited v. DCM Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between DCM Engineering Limited and DCM Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Sandeep Nehra & Ors. v. State Through Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/323/34 IPC based on a compromise between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ajay Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate v. STATE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting under Section 149 IPC, holding that the appellants formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit violence during a factional clash at the Food Corporation of India premises.